Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
DALPA Propoganda Wrong Again.... >

DALPA Propoganda Wrong Again....

Search

Notices

DALPA Propoganda Wrong Again....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-2015 | 07:57 AM
  #41  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Yup. Stockholm Syndrome is a powerful phenomenon.

Carl
I think both ALPA national, and Delta management are content with C2012 for the next decade. Both will make it happen, just my 2 cents....

I can't imagine this TA being voted in. This is what I see looking at it objectively from the outside.
Reply
Old 06-30-2015 | 08:10 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Incorrect. EASK's provide the better protection for pilots. That's why we fought for EASK's in C2012. It's why the company wants out of it now in favor of block hours.

Carl
mmmmmmmmaybe. Actually I agree with the logic that block hours are better in a downturn, but.... you have to ass/u/me that AK/KLM will downsize (which amazingly enough, they did not do at all in the last downturn which caused the company to be out of compliance). The elephant in the room is that we now have X% of all that flying, are instantly brought into compliance, and then allow a further reduction of block hours. Hmmmmmm I wonder what will happen?

The question I have to keep asking myself is what is going to happen during the term of this agreement. Do you see a downturn? Do you see AAL or UAL suddenly overtaking DAL in terms of profitability and operations? They are both good airlines, but I think we are way ahead in terms of the merger synergies. And with what just happened to USAPA, how will that affect things? It surely won't be resolved in enough time to make a difference during the term of this agreement.
Reply
Old 06-30-2015 | 08:19 AM
  #43  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
The question I have to keep asking myself is what is going to happen during the term of this agreement. Do you see a downturn? Do you see AAL or UAL suddenly overtaking DAL in terms of profitability and operations? They are both good airlines, but I think we are way ahead in terms of the merger synergies. And with what just happened to USAPA, how will that affect things? It surely won't be resolved in enough time to make a difference during the term of this agreement.
Flying will shift from China/Europe to South America, and other TPP countries. We may even get kicked out of China completely due to a looming currency war.

I expect over the next 5 years, American will be making more profit than all the other airlines combined. Delta will still be making $5-6 billion a year though. I see UAL possibly losing money depending on how they respond to the market shift.
Reply
Old 06-30-2015 | 08:24 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Flying will shift from China/Europe to South America, and other TPP countries. We may even get kicked out of China completely due to a looming currency war.

I expect over the next 5 years, American will be making more profit than all the other airlines combined. Delta will still be making $5-6 billion a year though. I see UAL possibly losing money depending on how they respond to the market shift.
Probably a fair assessment. American is certainly ramping up the debt though. That could get interesting in a downturn.
Reply
Old 06-30-2015 | 08:29 AM
  #45  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
mmmmmmmmaybe. Actually I agree with the logic that block hours are better in a downturn, but.... you have to ass/u/me that AK/KLM will downsize (which amazingly enough, they did not do at all in the last downturn which caused the company to be out of compliance). The elephant in the room is that we now have X% of all that flying, are instantly brought into compliance, and then allow a further reduction of block hours. Hmmmmmm I wonder what will happen?

The question I have to keep asking myself is what is going to happen during the term of this agreement. Do you see a downturn? Do you see AAL or UAL suddenly overtaking DAL in terms of profitability and operations? They are both good airlines, but I think we are way ahead in terms of the merger synergies. And with what just happened to USAPA, how will that affect things? It surely won't be resolved in enough time to make a difference during the term of this agreement.
The truth is nobody knows what will happen during this term. We can only look at what this TA language allows. It allows management unlimited growth in the JV flying. It also allows management to down gauge across the board to lower paying equipment and greatly shrink the number of Delta passengers being flown by Delta pilots. In my mind the question is, why would we ALLOW that shrinking option in our section 1?

Carl
Reply
Old 06-30-2015 | 08:29 AM
  #46  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
Probably a fair assessment. American is certainly ramping up the debt though. That could get interesting in a downturn.
What kind of downturn? Our customers(people who fly) are pretty insulated against downturns. The people who get hosed don't really fly anyway. We saw the airlines get creamed during the housing bubble, it wasn't till after that bubble popped, that the airlines really took off. Stagflation is the killer of airlines, deflation is the savior.

Airline debt prevents corporate raiders from coming in, as Delta is becoming a juicy target for a hedge fund to gut the place. Wilson and Checci did this to NWA. I would rather Delta spend billions on product investment, than share buybacks. I think it's hilarious when management says that the JV airlines are a better product, apparently $6 billion wasn't enough to bring Delta up to par.
Reply
Old 06-30-2015 | 08:43 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
What kind of downturn? Our customers(people who fly) are pretty insulated against downturns. The people who get hosed don't really fly anyway. We saw the airlines get creamed during the housing bubble, it wasn't till after that bubble popped, that the airlines really took off. Stagflation is the killer of airlines, deflation is the savior.

Airline debt prevents corporate raiders from coming in, as Delta is becoming a juicy target for a hedge fund to gut the place. Wilson and Checci did this to NWA. I would rather Delta spend billions on product investment, than share buybacks. I think it's hilarious when management says that the JV airlines are a better product, apparently $6 billion wasn't enough to bring Delta up to par.
With 850 million shares outstanding, I am not the least bit worried about a Carl Ichan coming in. That is so 80s.
Reply
Old 06-30-2015 | 08:44 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
The truth is nobody knows what will happen during this term. We can only look at what this TA language allows. It allows management unlimited growth in the JV flying. It also allows management to down gauge across the board to lower paying equipment and greatly shrink the number of Delta passengers being flown by Delta pilots. In my mind the question is, why would we ALLOW that shrinking option in our section 1?

Carl
Yup. I agree with this.
Reply
Old 06-30-2015 | 08:48 AM
  #49  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
With 850 million shares outstanding, I am not the least bit worried about a Carl Ichan coming in. That is so 80s.
You can buy a company that has $60 billion in assets for $35 billion. Name another company like that. Delta's stock is ridiculously undervalued.
Reply
Old 06-30-2015 | 09:10 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
You can buy a company that has $60 billion in assets for $35 billion. Name another company like that. Delta's stock is ridiculously undervalued.
Yeah, you think if someone walked in and threw down a blank check it would get filled in with $35 billion? That's LOL funny. I do agree that our stock is undervalued though. I'm counting on it
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Safety
22
10-08-2014 08:07 PM
Flyjets1
Your Photos and Videos
2
07-23-2012 01:59 PM
steamgauge
Cargo
159
04-11-2012 12:42 PM
ShyGuy
Regional
272
01-03-2012 04:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices