Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Madsen
No it's not. Richard kept it OFF the table when he offered industry leading rates.
Then why are they worried that it won't get past memrat?
Quote:
If this gets to the NMB, his position will be "I offered them industry leading rates, six months early,
That would have been easily acceptable to the majority.
Quote:
with an industry leading profit sharing plan
Ditto.
Quote:
and an industry leading contract
With deep cutting concessions that the majority didn't want at any price. That is the only part that is unreasonable and will be the only reason its voted down.
Quote:
And our response will be, "we want more because we deserve it.
No, our response will be we shouldn't be taking concessions this deep to get smaller raises than we got when we were 1/5th as profitable with 3 times the debt.
They claim the cost is 1.1B, so give back 100M and take 1.0B in gains without concessions (still 100M cheaper by the company's own admission, under any and all circumstances, assuming they properly costed everything out, which of course they did) and that is extremely reasonable.
Quote:
No chance we'll ever be released with a package any where near what he's offered still on the table.
That's why we'll offer a 100M cheaper alternative, sit back and watch them try and explain to the gods of reason how that isn't "reasonable".