The Law Requires Negotiating In Good Faith
#22
Our contract does not expire. It becomes amendable on the date agreed, in this case 1/1/2016. The good faith bargaining is not an issue because if we do not want to amend the contract we do not have to bargain. Normally one side or both choose to because they see advantages to amending.
The company can file for NMB mediation and then both sides would be guided and pressured to come to a deal, this takes years in some cases. If it can't be done then the NMB declares an impasse and starts a 30 day cooling off period. After the 30 days self help is allowed, strikes or lockouts. There is never a forced settlement or time limit unless both parties agree to it. The PEB is only by presidential order that may or may not come. The PEB can not force a settlement either but can ratchet up the pressure on both sides. We are under no obligation to change the PWA ever. If we like what we have better than any other offers that is perfectly fine.
My opinion is we will reach a deal with more money, like a real raise on 1/1/2016 or less QOL impact, like leave sick alone or scope or FO schedules. This will end and until then I am comfortable with our current agreement and it's ability to keep our pay rates industry average and our profit sharing the best by far of the industry and better than most companies period. Why change that for concessions?
The company can file for NMB mediation and then both sides would be guided and pressured to come to a deal, this takes years in some cases. If it can't be done then the NMB declares an impasse and starts a 30 day cooling off period. After the 30 days self help is allowed, strikes or lockouts. There is never a forced settlement or time limit unless both parties agree to it. The PEB is only by presidential order that may or may not come. The PEB can not force a settlement either but can ratchet up the pressure on both sides. We are under no obligation to change the PWA ever. If we like what we have better than any other offers that is perfectly fine.
My opinion is we will reach a deal with more money, like a real raise on 1/1/2016 or less QOL impact, like leave sick alone or scope or FO schedules. This will end and until then I am comfortable with our current agreement and it's ability to keep our pay rates industry average and our profit sharing the best by far of the industry and better than most companies period. Why change that for concessions?
Last edited by notEnuf; 07-03-2015 at 07:19 PM.
#23
Snake
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 242
After the TA is rejected, both parties are required by law to return to the table and negotiate in good faith.
I guess the law doesn't apply to our CEO.
How many times a day does the TA machine threaten us with the NMB??
Perhaps Richard should consult an attorney before he makes such statements. Oh wait.............
I guess the law doesn't apply to our CEO.
How many times a day does the TA machine threaten us with the NMB??
Perhaps Richard should consult an attorney before he makes such statements. Oh wait.............
Um, and FedEx, and UPS, and about twenty other airline labor groups at the NMB, all of which are negotiating in good faith.
#24
#25
There are no plans nor does the TA allow the company to use Sedgewick. I pushed this issue hard with multiple sources. The language requires the records be kept on property under the care of a Delta AME.
Delta has advertised for a AME to head that department and contrary to the forum hysteria Dr Faulkner is not resigning in refusal to do this. Dr Faulkner is not a Delta employee. He is a part time contractor with his own private practice. Delta is hiring a full time AME who will be a Delta employee. Dr Faulkner declined shutting down his private practice to go full time at Delta. He may stay on as a consultant.
Delta has advertised for a AME to head that department and contrary to the forum hysteria Dr Faulkner is not resigning in refusal to do this. Dr Faulkner is not a Delta employee. He is a part time contractor with his own private practice. Delta is hiring a full time AME who will be a Delta employee. Dr Faulkner declined shutting down his private practice to go full time at Delta. He may stay on as a consultant.
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 7ER Capt
Posts: 461
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 7ER Capt
Posts: 461
Also, not if we had lines of time and touching trips, like SWA CURRENTLY has. That alone would create probably 3000 jobs minimum.
As well as MUCH more time off, since under that system, one could easily turn one week into a minimum of 19dys off (a lot more if you have longer trips!)... which is exactly what I did as a new hire, probationary pilot!
Not to mention, SWA has ZERO SL verification and ZERO CPO involvement... ZERO!
Please DALPA, stop "improving" our contracts!
Voted NO, Now 44 Must Go!
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 273
What else was RA going to say vote this down and Yes we will give you a better deal. The financial gains of this contract are not worth the QOL of life sacrifices. Never should a union negotiate seniority away I don't care how few it effects.
I will step up to the plate and volunteer my time to rebuild DALPA but refuse to volunteer one minute under a leader who stands in front of its members and tries to sell a contract all while having the police present for his security. Once that didn't work he switched plans and has his goon squad in black polo shirts stand guard at the NY road show. He is a pathetic leader, maybe a nice guy but as the leader of our pilot group he is a failure.
I will step up to the plate and volunteer my time to rebuild DALPA but refuse to volunteer one minute under a leader who stands in front of its members and tries to sell a contract all while having the police present for his security. Once that didn't work he switched plans and has his goon squad in black polo shirts stand guard at the NY road show. He is a pathetic leader, maybe a nice guy but as the leader of our pilot group he is a failure.
#30
You are just wrong.
ALPA may be saying that the company would never do that but there is language in the TA that specifically allows them to do it.
The TA allows Sedgwick or anyone else Delta "designates" to handle the verification process.
It will be a nightmare for any pilot with medical issues.
Sedgwick makes their money by denying claims. Its what they do.
Big corporations don't hire them to manage this stuff because they have a reputation for being generous to employees.
"We're sorry but your evidence of illness is not sufficient." Sick Pay: DENIED.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Cargo
13
12-23-2005 04:12 AM