JV settlement email
07-28-2015 | 11:54 AM
#12
Back on TDY
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
The worst part is that the administration lied to us. Numerous emails prior to this release stated emphatically that the settlement language had NO CHANGES to the existing contract language.
A flat out lie. They gave away a significant portion of leverage we had to achieve a great new contract. Stunned.
Carl
A flat out lie. They gave away a significant portion of leverage we had to achieve a great new contract. Stunned.
Carl
07-28-2015 | 12:28 PM
#13
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 636
Likes: 13
From: Stretch DC-9 Gear Slinger
The worst part is that the administration lied to us. Numerous emails prior to this release stated emphatically that the settlement language had NO CHANGES to the existing contract language.
A flat out lie. They gave away a significant portion of leverage we had to achieve a great new contract. Stunned.
Carl
A flat out lie. They gave away a significant portion of leverage we had to achieve a great new contract. Stunned.
Carl
07-28-2015 | 12:56 PM
#14
Back on TDY
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
They all had to know. They all lied to us. Forget the reps selling the yes vote even the reps that voted no knew about this. They all need to go. We need to recall them all and start over. I feel like if someone has ever had any position at ALPA they need to fly the line for the rest of their careers. I was mad at the TA but we were betrayed with the JV settlement.
Carl
07-28-2015 | 01:18 PM
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 0
From: Power top
Yeah, it's real nice they sat on that one for a while. These guys just keep throwing gas on the fire.
What do you think the vote would have turned out like if we knew what we know now? JV settlement/China Air purchase/etc.
I'd go with 80/20. Would have been nice to have that extra leverage.
What do you think the vote would have turned out like if we knew what we know now? JV settlement/China Air purchase/etc.
I'd go with 80/20. Would have been nice to have that extra leverage.
07-28-2015 | 01:23 PM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
From: A320 Left
07-28-2015 | 01:26 PM
#17
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
When does it stop? Is there a DFR lawsuit in there? I think the AF/KLM settlement has got to be close.
What exactly is the argument for keeping ALPA on the property?
07-29-2015 | 08:16 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
07-29-2015 | 08:50 AM
#20
Banned
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Agreed!
What would happen if 12,000 DAL pilots suddenly said "We're not going to honor our contract....we'll just not fly our last leg on our rotation".
The company would go ape-****** and would try to sue everyone involved.
The MEC, and the "shadow MEC" (the entrenched DALPA administration) just bent over and took pennies on the dollar for a CONTRACT VIOLATION.
What would happen if 12,000 DAL pilots suddenly said "We're not going to honor our contract....we'll just not fly our last leg on our rotation".
The company would go ape-****** and would try to sue everyone involved.
The MEC, and the "shadow MEC" (the entrenched DALPA administration) just bent over and took pennies on the dollar for a CONTRACT VIOLATION.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
