JV settlement email
#51
Scam of, as you know the change to top end scope would have been so small it would have been hard to even see its effect. It's likely the company will be in compliance with the current scope in the next measurement period. The change at the bottom was however huge. We were looking at 500 captains jobs with a fleet in the 70 to 90 jet range the company planned.
And right now there is an incentive to doing just that- we are cheaper. So what's the excuse?
In order to afford the 70 to 90 E190 fleet plus 40 737-900s we need dci to drop from 450 to 425 while adding 55 jumbo rjs to the dci fleet? wait. That math doesn't work. Unless 25 CRJ200s cost as much as 130 mainline jets?
How about call it was it was. They wanted to add sjs to the ta to get us to vote in concessions. Nothing more. Like a light pole in nashville we say no to this crap moving forward.
#53
Other APC synonyms: moo, mute; all useable interchangeably with spelling unimportant.
#56
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 636
Likes: 13
From: Stretch DC-9 Gear Slinger
#57
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
this unfortunate incident would seem to illustrate some interesting axioms.
haste makes waste? or a stitch in time? There is never time to do it right...but always to do it twice? (aka do it once...) THE 7 'p'S,
sounds like an impatient individual, easily frustrated and angered with disruptions to his agenda and schedule.
couldn't we examine this ta process metaphorically, and assign the expedited and emotional mec process the identity of a frustrated and angry captain....in a hurry to 'get around' ramp traffic?
and the 65% who voted no.....the FO who saved the captains butt by saying STOP! in the nick of time?
haste makes waste? or a stitch in time? There is never time to do it right...but always to do it twice? (aka do it once...) THE 7 'p'S,
sounds like an impatient individual, easily frustrated and angered with disruptions to his agenda and schedule.
couldn't we examine this ta process metaphorically, and assign the expedited and emotional mec process the identity of a frustrated and angry captain....in a hurry to 'get around' ramp traffic?
and the 65% who voted no.....the FO who saved the captains butt by saying STOP! in the nick of time?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




