Search

Notices

"Good faith"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2015 | 05:54 AM
  #11  
TenYearsGone's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 0
From: 7ERB
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Can you post his comments or provide a link?
Are you serious or being a smart donkey?

Even your Outgoing NC, Outgoing MEC-Chair and soon to be ousted YES Voting Reps, said the same thing.

TEN
Reply
Old 08-05-2015 | 06:02 AM
  #12  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
Are you serious or being a smart donkey?

Even your Outgoing NC, Outgoing MEC-Chair and soon to be ousted YES Voting Reps, said the same thing.

TEN
Ten,

I think the words coming from sleepy Ed's mouth are significantly different than coming from the union guys.

Given the history with him in BKrptcy, now that we are making Billions, he's still giving the finger.

This is not the time to play hardball.
Reply
Old 08-05-2015 | 06:10 AM
  #13  
TenYearsGone's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 0
From: 7ERB
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Ten,

I think the words coming from sleepy Ed's mouth are significantly different than coming from the union guys.

Given the history with him in BKrptcy, now that we are making Billions, he's still giving the finger.

This is not the time to play hardball.
I think our NC and MEC gave us the "finger" when they:

1) Tried to sell us on Management's phrase "Last, Best and Final Offer"

2) Tried to sell us on a concessionary, self funding TA1

Both are saying the same thing, in different ways. Both are getting paid handsomely too.

Sleepy ED=Steenland

Cheers Brother,

TEN
Reply
Old 08-05-2015 | 08:27 AM
  #14  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by ImTumbleweed
I've heard the same.

The quote I heard was:

"We'll get a new TA"...then almost under his breath said "but the economics will not change".

He won't settle for anything other than a "cost neutral contract".

"Constructive Engagement" was an interesting approach to negotiations. Obviously, we've learned that this approach is not working.

It's time for a new approach to negotiations.

The company needs to learn that it's in their financial best interests to pay us an honest wage, for honest work, while we are forced to spend almost half our lives away from home.
Again, I think the biggest problem we have is our own union deceiving us as to the contract's net gain/loss to the pilot group. By his statement, Ed said (exactly like C2012) that this TA was cost neutral to Delta. Whatever gains received by the pilots MUST be equally offset by concessions in order to make the net cost to Delta neutral. What does our union say? Our union says it's a gain of 1.1 billion over the life of the contract. Somebody's lying. But since RA and ED said this exact same thing during investor calls and as such could be in legal jeopardy if they lied about it, I think it's clear our union is the one lying.

It's probably true that the failed TA had costed gains of 1.1 billion for the term of the TA. It's also true however that company believes the value of the failed TA's CONCESSIONS were also worth 1.1 billion... making it cost neutral. We'll never get anywhere when our own union communicates a constant stream of deception.

Carl
Reply
Old 08-05-2015 | 09:15 AM
  #15  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Sleepy Ed has been quoted as saying there is "no more money" in any deal. Frankly, I'm surprised RA is letting him anywhere near this deal after his incompetence with NA15.

Anyway, the RLA requires both parties to continue to negotiate in good faith.

I'm trying to figure out how a Ed's statement reflects a "good faith" position.

And if his statement is legal, then we need to deliver an equally inflammatory (and highly public) response. Why haven't we?
I'm wondering what our "Official Negotiation Status" is right now, since we turned down the TA, and both the MEC Chairman and the Negotiating Committee have resigned, have 'Negotiations' ceased for now?

The reason I ask is, once we are -in negotiations- we are bound to behave in a 'status quo' manner, when it comes to flying overtime, sick leave usage, and other parts of our contract.

If we are no longer in negotiations (and how could we be, with no NC?) then we are NOT bound by Status Quo, so, party on Garth!
Reply
Old 08-05-2015 | 10:39 AM
  #16  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
I'm wondering what our "Official Negotiation Status" is right now, since we turned down the TA, and both the MEC Chairman and the Negotiating Committee have resigned, have 'Negotiations' ceased for now?

The reason I ask is, once we are -in negotiations- we are bound to behave in a 'status quo' manner, when it comes to flying overtime, sick leave usage, and other parts of our contract.

If we are no longer in negotiations (and how could we be, with no NC?) then we are NOT bound by Status Quo, so, party on Garth!
Once Section 6 negotiations begin, they don't technically stop until an impasse is declared or an agreement is reached. Regardless of the makeup (or lack thereof) of your committee.

Carl
Reply
Old 08-05-2015 | 01:47 PM
  #17  
Snake
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Default

It's status quo since openers have already been exchanged.
Reply
Old 08-08-2015 | 09:41 AM
  #18  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,254
Likes: 709
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Good-Faith Bargaining Law & Legal Definition

Good-faith bargaining generally refers to the duty of the parties to meet and negotiate at reasonable times with willingness to reach agreement on matters within the scope of representation; however, neither party is required to make a concession or agree to any proposal.
Good faith bargaining requires employers and unions involved in collective bargaining to:
  • use their best endeavours to agree to an effective bargaining process
  • meet and consider and respond to proposals made by each other
  • respect the role of the other's representative by not seeking to bargain directly with those for whom the representative acts
  • not do anything to undermine the bargaining process or the authority of the other's representative.
As with most legal principles the assumption is you are within compliance of the law until accused and judged otherwise. Innocent until proven guilty. This is the concept that requires evidence of harm before compensation is granted. If either side makes an accusation of bad faith then the NMB and a judge my get involved, until then its all just a part of positioning.
Reply
Old 08-08-2015 | 10:11 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
From: A330 First Officer
Default

I've heard a lot of talk from both the union and the company about us getting pay out of line with our peers (AA, UAL) Well that doesn't seem to cut both ways. Here is the total CEO compensations for 2014 from Airline Biz Blog
Delta CEO $17.59 million
United CEO $12.76 million
American CEO $12.3 million
So it only seems to be a problem if it has to do with pilot pay. Additionally we are the only employee group that has not reached their pre give back payrates. I know that old Lee M didn't do us any favors by saying that we have reached our pre-BK payrates, however that does not count the 32% paycut that we took to try and stay out of BK. The FA's are now 6% above their pre give back payrates while we trail ours by about 15-18%. I would think that we could make a case that the company is being punitive as we have been singled out.
Reply
Old 08-08-2015 | 10:34 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 0
From: Power top
Default

Originally Posted by DALMD88FO
I've heard a lot of talk from both the union and the company about us getting pay out of line with our peers (AA, UAL) Well that doesn't seem to cut both ways. Here is the total CEO compensations for 2014 from Airline Biz Blog
Delta CEO $17.59 million
United CEO $12.76 million
American CEO $12.3 million
So it only seems to be a problem if it has to do with pilot pay. Additionally we are the only employee group that has not reached their pre give back payrates. I know that old Lee M didn't do us any favors by saying that we have reached our pre-BK payrates, however that does not count the 32% paycut that we took to try and stay out of BK. The FA's are now 6% above their pre give back payrates while we trail ours by about 15-18%. I would think that we could make a case that the company is being punitive as we have been singled out.
Our CEO was way ahead of his peers until recently, they've been catching up. IOW, he's been making quite a bit more than his peers for several years, 2 to 3 times as much.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetPiedmont
Major
1
05-22-2008 11:23 AM
joel payne
Hangar Talk
2
01-09-2008 07:15 PM
mcartier713
Hangar Talk
15
12-10-2007 06:59 PM
otter
Major
9
08-24-2005 04:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices