DL/ALPA Warning: Regional Commuting
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 880
Which is why they had to offer a 10k signing bonus and recently agreed to a new TA that raises first year FO pay while also providing hotel rooms for commuters?? Every regional has had some trouble staffing, compass is not immune.
Shuttle America and GoJet both fly Delta Connection (among others) for those who are not privy.
I agree with Zip - outsourcing of RJ flying will likely resolve itself (IF) we do not agree to allowing management to up-gauge current RJ flying. Their current objective is to get more large RJs in exchange for fewer small RJs, this only perpetuates the outsourcing of Delta pilot jobs. If management wants to up-guage that flying, a 717 or equivalent sounds just fine.
Shuttle America and GoJet both fly Delta Connection (among others) for those who are not privy.
I agree with Zip - outsourcing of RJ flying will likely resolve itself (IF) we do not agree to allowing management to up-gauge current RJ flying. Their current objective is to get more large RJs in exchange for fewer small RJs, this only perpetuates the outsourcing of Delta pilot jobs. If management wants to up-guage that flying, a 717 or equivalent sounds just fine.
#12
Apparently Compass has plans to hire 40/ month through spring. IMO, the recent improvements are an attempt to increase the chances of being able to hire that amount in the upcoming months. The reason for hiring that many people remains a mystery as far as I know...
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,679
Possibly. But the way that 117 has affected regional airlines in the amount of flying done. Granted, NOT ALL, but some.
Meaning, "timing out" at the end of the year is more difficult nowadays.
It's more related to staffing issues, especially at RAH. It's been happening for a while with RAH/DelCon flying.
Agreed. The 50 seat RJ is the scourge. In efficient, a terrible airframe, etc etc etc. Yet the current scope wants to get rid of them, GOOD. But what's a BIGGER threat to the mainline narrow body job? The crappy 50 seater (today's turbo prop) going from hub to easy jesus crap-hole small town nowhere? Or the 70+ plus seat jet serving larger cities?
DAL is light year ahead with the 717 taking over much of what used to be done with RJ's. But that train needs to keep on rolling, MORE elimination of the 70+ seat scope.
True. And sadly, mainline wants the regional feed to be cheaper and cheaper. Even though they are getting regional feed at rock bottom prices that were leveraged during the bankruptcies and reaping record profits.
Yet it's funny, some of the regional managements are telling their pilots they can't afford to pay them more because mainline doesn't want to pay the regional feeder more money for their lift. Yet there's regional airlines upping pay for first year FO's. The things that make you scratch your head....
Not just your opinion, pretty much fact, IMO
But sadly, as they say, "and the world keeps turning.........".
We're all waiting for this whole "Regional/RJ experiment" to fall completely on it's face. It's happening, albeit in small increments. But it's also being mitigated and slowed down some what.
Meaning, "timing out" at the end of the year is more difficult nowadays.
It's more related to staffing issues, especially at RAH. It's been happening for a while with RAH/DelCon flying.
I agree with Zip - outsourcing of RJ flying will likely resolve itself (IF) we do not agree to allowing management to up-gauge current RJ flying. Their current objective is to get more large RJs in exchange for fewer small RJs, this only perpetuates the outsourcing of Delta pilot jobs. If management wants to up-guage that flying, a 717 or equivalent sounds just fine.
DAL is light year ahead with the 717 taking over much of what used to be done with RJ's. But that train needs to keep on rolling, MORE elimination of the 70+ seat scope.
They have been able to maintain quality and reliability at mainline because they have made the investments in the operation/people/infrastructure to do so.... It's hard to have reliable service when you squeeze your "partners" into money losing contracts and rebid flying/station/ground handling every 2 years while also creating your own alter-ego companies to bid against them.
Yet it's funny, some of the regional managements are telling their pilots they can't afford to pay them more because mainline doesn't want to pay the regional feeder more money for their lift. Yet there's regional airlines upping pay for first year FO's. The things that make you scratch your head....
I agree that more mainline flying is beneficial to us all in the long run... The Delta, United, and Americans of the world can't just throw their hands up claiming ignorance of how this all happened. Pilot shortage is part of it, but the airlines themselves have played a huge part in this mess. The Wall St focus on quarterly results has led to a loss of long-term vision in my opinion.
But sadly, as they say, "and the world keeps turning.........".
We're all waiting for this whole "Regional/RJ experiment" to fall completely on it's face. It's happening, albeit in small increments. But it's also being mitigated and slowed down some what.
#14
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Possibly. But the way that 117 has affected regional airlines in the amount of flying done. Granted, NOT ALL, but some.
Meaning, "timing out" at the end of the year is more difficult nowadays.
It's more related to staffing issues, especially at RAH. It's been happening for a while with RAH/DelCon flying.
Meaning, "timing out" at the end of the year is more difficult nowadays.
It's more related to staffing issues, especially at RAH. It's been happening for a while with RAH/DelCon flying.
If you think about it, that is only 83hour/month to hit 1000. As the regionals struggle to staff, they raise their minimum line values up to 95 hours/month. Since we are almost into 2 years since 117 started, you can expect to see 1000/365 issues popping up every day and getting progressively worse as the regionals force their pilots to fly more and more months at the maximum.
With the 100 hour lookback done in 28 days instead of a calendar month, you could see pilots timing out within 9 months. A regional may think it is solving its issues by raising their minimum line value, but it may actually be coming back to bite them as they get a rolling situation where some of their pilots get block hour limited to 50 hours/month or less on a increasing basis.
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,679
There was a reason I SAID "some, not all" or something along those lines.
It depends and can vary ********.
Many regional 4 trips would routinely have a pilot fly 23-24-25 and hours pre 117, with a pilot bumping up to 100 in a month if they chose or were awarded.
Talk to many (some, NOT ALL) and those trips can frequently have less. Way less than 20 hours of flying on them now due to shorter duty periods and not being able to wedge as many segments and flying into the 117 FDP compared to before.
SOME, NOT ALL....
Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 12-06-2015 at 02:47 PM. Reason: TOU
#16
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Really! Seriously? Thanks......
There was a reason I SAID "some, not all" or something along those lines.
It depends and can vary *****
Many regional 4 trips would routinely have a pilot fly 23-24-25 and hours pre 117, with a pilot bumping up to 100 in a month if they chose or were awarded.
Talk to many (some, NOT ALL) and those trips can frequently have less. Way less than 20 hours of flying on them now due to shorter duty periods and not being able to wedge as many segments and flying into the 117 FDP compared to before.
SOME, NOT ALL....
There was a reason I SAID "some, not all" or something along those lines.
It depends and can vary *****
Many regional 4 trips would routinely have a pilot fly 23-24-25 and hours pre 117, with a pilot bumping up to 100 in a month if they chose or were awarded.
Talk to many (some, NOT ALL) and those trips can frequently have less. Way less than 20 hours of flying on them now due to shorter duty periods and not being able to wedge as many segments and flying into the 117 FDP compared to before.
SOME, NOT ALL....
Compass has had 35 hour 5 days and 28 hour 4 days. With the removal of 30/7 they can cram more into 7 days.
As for shorter duty days, I have seen them become more efficient with removing sits and 30 hour layovers by incorporating DH's when needed. The regionals are struggling right now and it is only getting worse.
Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 12-06-2015 at 02:48 PM. Reason: TOU
#19
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: CRJ7
Posts: 54
For all you current Delta employees whom might be affected by the unreliability of Gojet:
I want to apologize and I hope your commutes go by smoothly. There is nothing I hate more than being embarrassed by my company.
We actually do take pride in our work and the service we provide to our partners, things are not looking any better for all the crews. We have been on the road for 3+ days and not operated a single flight, we are also loosing all of our credit hours since we don't have trip rigs, duty rigs or pay protection.
I can assure you the general consensus on the pilot group is nothing but apologetic about this situation.
I want to apologize and I hope your commutes go by smoothly. There is nothing I hate more than being embarrassed by my company.
We actually do take pride in our work and the service we provide to our partners, things are not looking any better for all the crews. We have been on the road for 3+ days and not operated a single flight, we are also loosing all of our credit hours since we don't have trip rigs, duty rigs or pay protection.
I can assure you the general consensus on the pilot group is nothing but apologetic about this situation.
#20
For all you current Delta employees whom might be affected by the unreliability of Gojet:
I want to apologize and I hope your commutes go by smoothly. There is nothing I hate more than being embarrassed by my company.
We actually do take pride in our work and the service we provide to our partners, things are not looking any better for all the crews. We have been on the road for 3+ days and not operated a single flight, we are also loosing all of our credit hours since we don't have trip rigs, duty rigs or pay protection.
I can assure you the general consensus on the pilot group is nothing but apologetic about this situation.
I want to apologize and I hope your commutes go by smoothly. There is nothing I hate more than being embarrassed by my company.
We actually do take pride in our work and the service we provide to our partners, things are not looking any better for all the crews. We have been on the road for 3+ days and not operated a single flight, we are also loosing all of our credit hours since we don't have trip rigs, duty rigs or pay protection.
I can assure you the general consensus on the pilot group is nothing but apologetic about this situation.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post