![]() |
Originally Posted by Hank Kingsley
(Post 2095858)
Some would have you fenced for 20 years, be careful what you wish for.
|
What if they were "bought" by a regional (that Delta happened to be a large shareowner of)?
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 2096762)
What if they were "bought" by a regional (that Delta happened to be a large shareowner of)?
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 2096762)
What if they were "bought" by a regional (that Delta happened to be a large shareowner of)?
That didn't work out so well...... Companies would have to be kept separate to satisfy any legacy scope clause, but employees aren't content with that solution. And Legacy would have to divest of the shares of said regional. |
Isn't virgin based out of SFO? Why would we make a frontal assault on a UAL hub?
Or do it just to buy Airbuses we could probably get cheaper elsewhere? JB makes the most sense for them and would be a pretty decent airline. |
Originally Posted by WhatNow
(Post 2096145)
I don't think he has been involved in contract negotiations. He has on the other hand produced strong results in SLI's.
|
Originally Posted by CRJGOAT
(Post 2095590)
Delta looks for leaders in the real world. Not someone who only shows those qualities behind a computer screen.
:D |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 2096732)
With age 65, I'd expect to see a 25 year fence.
This process, with these guidelines has recently been followed with regards to the CAL-UAL merger. The success or failure of a pilot group in an SLI is likely directly proportional to their merger committee's understanding of the guidelines established by policy, the fidelity of their proposal consistent with that policy, and their credibility with the arbitrators who would likely be the final authority on the list construction. |
Originally Posted by Reroute
(Post 2097302)
No way would there be a 25 year fence, more like 5 years. The list construction would be based on the credibility of your proposal, consistent with the the merger policy in effect at the time of the merger. In this case it would be an ALPA-ALPA merger, the factors to be considered in constructing a fair list in no particular order, or weight are:
This process, with these guidelines has recently been followed with regards to the CAL-UAL merger. The success or failure of a pilot group in an SLI is likely directly proportional to their merger committee's understanding of the guidelines established by policy, the fidelity of their proposal consistent with that policy, and their credibility with the arbitrators who would likely be the final authority on the list construction. Here is the reality my friend. The gaining carrier always gets their way. The arbitrators want to be chosen again so they can soak up the insane compensation. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 2097145)
Until I done got here.
:D |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:22 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands