Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Tier 3 & 4 Candidates... >

Tier 3 & 4 Candidates...

Search
Notices

Tier 3 & 4 Candidates...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-24-2016, 02:11 PM
  #71  
whatever
 
Vital Signs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 421
Default

Can we go back to discussing Delta scraping the bottom of the barrel for pilots cause my hand is up and it helps me to feel better about myself.
Vital Signs is offline  
Old 07-24-2016, 02:14 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 360
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
I went back to Delta net to post the numbers for probably the 10th time on here however I can't find them on the new Delta Net.
You forget that there were changes in the contract adding jobs offsetting job loss changes. Even a quick look as I posted earlier on the fleet size changes makes it obvious there was little to no job loss. The last time I posted the numbers here block hours were up around 12% total. International was flat and domestic up over 20% for a net gain of 12. Total pilots onboard were up the same.
We'll have to agree to disagree on your jobs gains/losses offset assertion.

WRT your point about fleet size, that increase is primarily driven by the current and future market for pilots. With the much anticipated age 65 bow wave hitting coupled with the hiring sprees at other airlines, the commuters can't staff to meet legacies' needs so more flying is coming back in house. Add to that our fallout with Alaskan and there's your growth.

I think you were on the DAL Poolie thread right after the NA15 vote lamenting that DAL was slowing hiring due to the E190 order cancellation. And now you're giddy in praising the increased hiring numbers. So it seems you now agree the fleet/hiring increase has nothing to do with the TA.
trustbutverify is offline  
Old 07-24-2016, 02:22 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,278
Default

Originally Posted by trustbutverify View Post
We'll have to agree to disagree on your jobs gains/losses offset assertion.

WRT your point about fleet size, that increase is primarily driven by the current and future market for pilots. With the much anticipated age 65 bow wave hitting coupled with the hiring sprees at other airlines, the commuters can't staff to meet legacies' needs so more flying is coming back in house. Add to that our fallout with Alaskan and there's your growth.

I think you were on the DAL Poolie thread right after the NA15 vote lamenting that DAL was slowing hiring due to the E190 order cancellation. And now you're giddy in praising the increased hiring numbers. So it seems you now agree the fleet/hiring increase has nothing to do with the TA.
When you are trying to determine if a contract has reduced or increased manning where the flying comes from is of no consequence. All that matters is how many pilots it takes to fly X amount of block hours. If the block hours go up 12% and the number of pilots goes up 12% then there has been no change in manning.

Last edited by sailingfun; 07-24-2016 at 02:37 PM.
sailingfun is online now  
Old 07-24-2016, 02:32 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,278
Default

Originally Posted by trustbutverify View Post
We'll have to agree to disagree on your jobs gains/losses offset assertion.

WRT your point about fleet size, that increase is primarily driven by the current and future market for pilots. With the much anticipated age 65 bow wave hitting coupled with the hiring sprees at other airlines, the commuters can't staff to meet legacies' needs so more flying is coming back in house. Add to that our fallout with Alaskan and there's your growth.

I think you were on the DAL Poolie thread right after the NA15 vote lamenting that DAL was slowing hiring due to the E190 order cancellation. And now you're giddy in praising the increased hiring numbers. So it seems you now agree the fleet/hiring increase has nothing to do with the TA.
I have not praised the increased hiring numbers. I pointed out we hired more pilots under contract 2012 then promised by the union or company.
I would however say increased hiring is a good thing would you not? The increase in hiring does baffle me a bit since we have reduced the A350 orders and the C100 shows up later then the E190's were coming. I understand the MEC got a interesting fleet plan brief from the company and a hiring update. I have no details. I thought perhaps the dangling orders comment related to that.
This summer on international has been the worst loads I have seen in a long time. I have been easily able to take family with me on S3B's. I fear for what marketing plans to Europe next year which again leaves me baffled on the hiring.
sailingfun is online now  
Old 07-24-2016, 02:48 PM
  #75  
Straight QOL, homie
Thread Starter
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Unless there are offsets in other areas yes.
Have you seen any such offsets in the aips?
Purple Drank is offline  
Old 07-24-2016, 03:16 PM
  #76  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
There was and is no company with a plan to reengine 50 seaters. It would take years to get such a program certified and the engines are pretty good on them now. Not once did I see anyone say they would reengine them. They did say the engines were coming due for overhauls and mro capacity was limited do it had to be locked in soon. No idea if that was true or not.
As far as orders are they dangling any now?
Here is a nice summary that seems somewhat unbiased about our contracts. His numbers look correct.

ANALYSIS: Delta Pilots Ask for 40% Raise
Quit parsing words. It was engine overhauls (sometimes worded as reengining) that they were threatening to do if we didn't say yes.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 07-24-2016, 03:56 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Gramercy Riffs
Posts: 496
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
Quit parsing words. It was engine overhauls (sometimes worded as reengining) that they were threatening to do if we didn't say yes.

That's the way I remember it.
beernutt is offline  
Old 07-24-2016, 04:30 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,278
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
Quit parsing words. It was engine overhauls (sometimes worded as reengining) that they were threatening to do if we didn't say yes.
Isn't that exactly what I have been saying??
sailingfun is online now  
Old 07-24-2016, 04:42 PM
  #79  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Isn't that exactly what I have been saying??
You've been saying a lot of things today... keeping with your standard of being all over the place and disjointed.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 07-24-2016, 06:14 PM
  #80  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,870
Default

Speaking of who said what - help me out here. Late last summer/last fall when the announced hiring numbers were adjusted down someone was posting that it was due to the TA being voted down and no 190s coming.

Well how has that worked out?

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
114
12-11-2015 07:54 PM
cactiboss
American
41
06-29-2015 06:37 PM
HSLD
Hangar Talk
1
10-29-2006 01:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices