Suppressing Free Speech on APC?
#31
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Lets discuss it now. I read it and I think rubes number was 19%. Probably a trial balloon floated. I'd take 19% in a pay only LOA while we stay in sect. 6 to negotiate the rest. American seems to think that good will has value.
#32
Seems reasonable enough.
I guess the piece that I was interested in was the rationale as to not getting a deal, compared to what was allegedly on the table. I'd like to re-read it to see what else was in it beyond payrates. Because it's certainly pretty tough to consider a TA without the major pieces of Sections 1 and 3. Is vacation sellback still on the table? Retro? Changes to PS?
I guess the piece that I was interested in was the rationale as to not getting a deal, compared to what was allegedly on the table. I'd like to re-read it to see what else was in it beyond payrates. Because it's certainly pretty tough to consider a TA without the major pieces of Sections 1 and 3. Is vacation sellback still on the table? Retro? Changes to PS?
#33
#36
All of rube's posts have been getting increasingly inflammatory (al la purple drank).
All that happened was he got a reminder to tone down the inflammatory nature of his posting and contribute in a more positive manner. I'm sure he'll be able to play in the sandbox nicely from here on out.
Banned? Do you see banned under his user name? If not, then nope... not banned.
All that happened was he got a reminder to tone down the inflammatory nature of his posting and contribute in a more positive manner. I'm sure he'll be able to play in the sandbox nicely from here on out.
Banned? Do you see banned under his user name? If not, then nope... not banned.
#37
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
All of rube's posts have been getting increasingly inflammatory (al la purple drank).
All that happened was he got a reminder to tone down the inflammatory nature of his posting and contribute in a more positive manner. I'm sure he'll be able to play in the sandbox nicely from here on out.
All that happened was he got a reminder to tone down the inflammatory nature of his posting and contribute in a more positive manner. I'm sure he'll be able to play in the sandbox nicely from here on out.
I'm happy to discuss the post via PM, if you'll work with me to edit out the offensive part. I don't think the post was mostly rube anyway. I think he was quoting a member explaining why we're not getting a TA soon, and a rep going medieval on that member. Pretty vanilla internet stuff.
#39
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 95
From: DAL 330
#40
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 95
From: DAL 330
Cool. You go ahead and work with rube and purple. Purple has an interest in identities once again, and ad hominem attacks as always.
I'm happy to discuss the post via PM, if you'll work with me to edit out the offensive part. I don't think the post was mostly rube anyway. I think he was quoting a member explaining why we're not getting a TA soon, and a rep going medieval on that member. Pretty vanilla internet stuff.
I'm happy to discuss the post via PM, if you'll work with me to edit out the offensive part. I don't think the post was mostly rube anyway. I think he was quoting a member explaining why we're not getting a TA soon, and a rep going medieval on that member. Pretty vanilla internet stuff.
Rube is free to clean up his previous post and re-post at any time. We are trying to avoid the type of environment you can see at Chit Chat: Guys cursing at each other and plenty of flame-baiting posts.
With that said we are unable to read/monitor every post on every thread so if you see something objectionable please let a moderator know.
Thanks Scoop
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



