VEBA
#11
Denny
#12
Bye Bye Maddog!
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: Movin' On UP........
nobody asked me but my heartburn is this....
ALL your excess 401k money (over $37,500 company $$$$) goes into your VEBA so Delta gets a HUGE tax windfall not paying matching FICA taxes ......and you don't get the payraise.....
You die, and there may not be an opportunity to pass those $$$ to your heirs...if they are over 26 y/o, if your wife pre deceases you....It's absorbed by the borg...
A HUGE pot o' money controlled by someone OTHER than you looks pretty cool to a company or govt. in dire straights, and JUST WHO determines if your medical expenses are covered etc......?
There is not enough information out there yet.....
Oh, and what about the TriCare guys/gals? They probably don't want to contribute.....
We need to see the details BEFORE we make the decision IMHO.
ALL your excess 401k money (over $37,500 company $$$$) goes into your VEBA so Delta gets a HUGE tax windfall not paying matching FICA taxes ......and you don't get the payraise.....
You die, and there may not be an opportunity to pass those $$$ to your heirs...if they are over 26 y/o, if your wife pre deceases you....It's absorbed by the borg...
A HUGE pot o' money controlled by someone OTHER than you looks pretty cool to a company or govt. in dire straights, and JUST WHO determines if your medical expenses are covered etc......?
There is not enough information out there yet.....
Oh, and what about the TriCare guys/gals? They probably don't want to contribute.....
We need to see the details BEFORE we make the decision IMHO.
#14
So the last sentence really is the crux of what I'm after. The only parts I'm not a fan of so far are:
1. Potentially accruing WAY more than $50k...more than I'll ever be able to spend? Doubtful considering where things are heading with health costs, but I guess the math needs to be run just the same.
2. More importantly, as we all progress and start surpassing 401c limits, will the 401c excesses be mandatorily directed to the VEBA, which is how #1 would occur. At $1k/year, I'm not really that worried about ending up with too much in the VEBA. At $5k/year does the math change? I assume the principal would be invested and compound over the next 3 decades? How would each individual's basis be accounted for?
It's a good problem to have - contemplating a situation where we have too much money to spend on retiree healthcare. Of course, if that money could be better spent somewhere else...
For me, from what I've read and watched so far, the crux of this comes down to how #2 will be handled by the IRS.
1. Potentially accruing WAY more than $50k...more than I'll ever be able to spend? Doubtful considering where things are heading with health costs, but I guess the math needs to be run just the same.
2. More importantly, as we all progress and start surpassing 401c limits, will the 401c excesses be mandatorily directed to the VEBA, which is how #1 would occur. At $1k/year, I'm not really that worried about ending up with too much in the VEBA. At $5k/year does the math change? I assume the principal would be invested and compound over the next 3 decades? How would each individual's basis be accounted for?
It's a good problem to have - contemplating a situation where we have too much money to spend on retiree healthcare. Of course, if that money could be better spent somewhere else...
For me, from what I've read and watched so far, the crux of this comes down to how #2 will be handled by the IRS.
#15
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
From: DAL FO
nobody asked me but my heartburn is this....
ALL your excess 401k money (over $37,500 company $$$$) goes into your VEBA so Delta gets a HUGE tax windfall not paying matching FICA taxes ......and you don't get the payraise.....
You die, and there may not be an opportunity to pass those $$$ to your heirs...if they are over 26 y/o, if your wife pre deceases you....It's absorbed by the borg...
A HUGE pot o' money controlled by someone OTHER than you looks pretty cool to a company or govt. in dire straights, and JUST WHO determines if your medical expenses are covered etc......?
There is not enough information out there yet.....
Oh, and what about the TriCare guys/gals? They probably don't want to contribute.....
We need to see the details BEFORE we make the decision IMHO.
ALL your excess 401k money (over $37,500 company $$$$) goes into your VEBA so Delta gets a HUGE tax windfall not paying matching FICA taxes ......and you don't get the payraise.....
You die, and there may not be an opportunity to pass those $$$ to your heirs...if they are over 26 y/o, if your wife pre deceases you....It's absorbed by the borg...
A HUGE pot o' money controlled by someone OTHER than you looks pretty cool to a company or govt. in dire straights, and JUST WHO determines if your medical expenses are covered etc......?
There is not enough information out there yet.....
Oh, and what about the TriCare guys/gals? They probably don't want to contribute.....
We need to see the details BEFORE we make the decision IMHO.

Your first point is the biggest one. The video seemed to indicate there was a possibility of it being up to an individual as to how much, if any, of the 401c excess would be allocated to the VEBA. Of course that won't be known until the IRS issues a ruling.
So using current limits - I'm looking at 2:45 in the video - of $265k x 16% (latest company DPSP table position), we come out with $42,400 before the excess would become a consideration. Sooner if you mis-manage your individual contributions.
Can't really answer the rest of it, until/if the IRS rules. I'd be a lot happier if it was totally pilot option of where any excess goes, so we could manage it to keep the balance under control or take the distribution as cash. All that said under the auspice of "it's a good problem to have"
#16
But I did ask 
Your first point is the biggest one. The video seemed to indicate there was a possibility of it being up to an individual as to how much, if any, of the 401c excess would be allocated to the VEBA. Of course that won't be known until the IRS issues a ruling.
So using current limits - I'm looking at 2:45 in the video - of $265k x 16% (latest company DPSP table position), we come out with $42,400 before the excess would become a consideration. Sooner if you mis-manage your individual contributions.
This is how you can mitigate some of the money from going into the VEBA. Max 415c limit is $53,000 including your contributions. If you want the whole of the company contribution ($42,400) to go into your 401k, you cannot contribute up to your max of $18,000. You should only contribute $10,600. This way $7,300 is diverted away from the VEBA and into your paycheck.
Can't really answer the rest of it, until/if the IRS rules. I'd be a lot happier if it was totally pilot option of where any excess goes, so we could manage it to keep the balance under control or take the distribution as cash. All that said under the auspice of "it's a good problem to have"

Your first point is the biggest one. The video seemed to indicate there was a possibility of it being up to an individual as to how much, if any, of the 401c excess would be allocated to the VEBA. Of course that won't be known until the IRS issues a ruling.
So using current limits - I'm looking at 2:45 in the video - of $265k x 16% (latest company DPSP table position), we come out with $42,400 before the excess would become a consideration. Sooner if you mis-manage your individual contributions.
This is how you can mitigate some of the money from going into the VEBA. Max 415c limit is $53,000 including your contributions. If you want the whole of the company contribution ($42,400) to go into your 401k, you cannot contribute up to your max of $18,000. You should only contribute $10,600. This way $7,300 is diverted away from the VEBA and into your paycheck.
Can't really answer the rest of it, until/if the IRS rules. I'd be a lot happier if it was totally pilot option of where any excess goes, so we could manage it to keep the balance under control or take the distribution as cash. All that said under the auspice of "it's a good problem to have"
Denny
#18
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
From: DAL FO
As I understand it, only $50k could be passed on to heirs? Otherwise, for personal/spouse healthcare spending, the entire amount would be available. Correct?
DAL73n posted ~$250k in retiree health expenses which jives pretty much with what the Fidelity numbers were in the slide show. I can only assume that number is going to be way higher in 3 decades.
Unless I die, and my wife dies before we can spend the $ (in which case do I care?
) then we will be able to shelter more than $50k. Denny's point about basically using the HSA as an IRA is well taken, and could allow flexibility on the back end. I think the biggest issue is the use it or lose it aspect, especially in a large community pot. I'd like the ability to manage how much is being diverted into this account, but we've already pretty well covered that we won't know for sure until there is a ruling.
Complexity is hyperbole. Just because it's complicated means we shouldn't consider it?
As far as not trusting DALPA to manage it, I'd point to DPMA. It has a lot of parallels to this program (potentially), and AFAIK it runs very well and is beneficial to us all. Once you get out of the political side of the ALPA office, we have some really good volunteers that keep their heads down and provide a lot of value for the pilot group (if you're who I think you are, we worked together doing some of that very work several years back.) Should I be ****ed that I'm paying into DPMA every month and may never use that money?
#19
Snark and agenda aside, can you explain the $50k shelter?
As I understand it, only $50k could be passed on to heirs? Otherwise, for personal/spouse healthcare spending, the entire amount would be available. Correct?
DAL73n posted ~$250k in retiree health expenses which jives pretty much with what the Fidelity numbers were in the slide show. I can only assume that number is going to be way higher in 3 decades.
Unless I die, and my wife dies before we can spend the $ (in which case do I care?
) then we will be able to shelter more than $50k. Denny's point about basically using the HSA as an IRA is well taken, and could allow flexibility on the back end.
I think the biggest issue is the use it or lose it aspect, especially in a large community pot. I'd like the ability to manage how much is being diverted into this account, but we've already pretty well covered that we won't know for sure until there is a ruling.
Complexity is hyperbole. Just because it's complicated means we shouldn't consider it?
As far as not trusting DALPA to manage it, I'd point to DPMA. It has a lot of parallels to this program (potentially), and AFAIK it runs very well and is beneficial to us all. Once you get out of the political side of the ALPA office, we have some really good volunteers that keep their heads down and provide a lot of value for the pilot group (if you're who I think you are, we worked together doing some of that very work several years back.) Should I be ****ed that I'm paying into DPMA every month and may never use that money?
As I understand it, only $50k could be passed on to heirs? Otherwise, for personal/spouse healthcare spending, the entire amount would be available. Correct?
DAL73n posted ~$250k in retiree health expenses which jives pretty much with what the Fidelity numbers were in the slide show. I can only assume that number is going to be way higher in 3 decades.
Unless I die, and my wife dies before we can spend the $ (in which case do I care?
) then we will be able to shelter more than $50k. Denny's point about basically using the HSA as an IRA is well taken, and could allow flexibility on the back end. I think the biggest issue is the use it or lose it aspect, especially in a large community pot. I'd like the ability to manage how much is being diverted into this account, but we've already pretty well covered that we won't know for sure until there is a ruling.
Complexity is hyperbole. Just because it's complicated means we shouldn't consider it?
As far as not trusting DALPA to manage it, I'd point to DPMA. It has a lot of parallels to this program (potentially), and AFAIK it runs very well and is beneficial to us all. Once you get out of the political side of the ALPA office, we have some really good volunteers that keep their heads down and provide a lot of value for the pilot group (if you're who I think you are, we worked together doing some of that very work several years back.) Should I be ****ed that I'm paying into DPMA every month and may never use that money?
#20
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
From: DAL FO
If this were an option only, fine. I choose no to allow other manage my money when I can. The point is that this is going to be valued as a gain on the pilots side of the ledger. It's neutral at best. If this is sold as the retiree medical solution its a huge fail. This is a no cost, limited value item. We are talking about a tax shelter, not a medical benefit.
If it's neutral, fine. We can move on to arguing other things - like where's the $$$?
I'm still waiting for someone to point out all the egregious/nefarious things in a VEBA. So far, all I'm coming up with is I may inadvertently end up with a bunch of cash to pay for healthcare expenses. What am I missing other than it's a "tax shelter?"
All that said, I certainly didn't ask for it in my survey. I'd be curious to see where it came from. However, I'm not seeing the dark side of it, and certainly wouldn't hold my pay raise hostage over it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post


Yeah, right!

