![]() |
C2012 scope provisions turned out positively for us because of a confluence of events. The Cogan 1500 hr rule and the availability of 717s for almost free. One of those factors is being lobbied hard in Congress to be removed. How long do you think that 1500 hr rule will remain? Never underestimate the power of big money influencing government.
So when the Regionals start hiring 900, 750, even 250 hr guys again, those 76 seaters become more viable. Why would we allow more? Furthermore, why is it not the stated goal of our UNION that every Delta passenger be flown by Delta pilots? Isn't that the purpose of a UNION? |
Originally Posted by Sunvox
(Post 2197373)
So Trip, how many pilots has UAL hired since 2014 and how many has Delta hired?
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 2197302)
APA gave up significant scope concessions in their negotiations. They are parking 190s and buying more RJs.
By all means, continue with your awful analysis.... 80 what are your cost estimates for the upcoming scope concessions I listed? |
Originally Posted by satchip
(Post 2197411)
C2012 scope provisions turned out positively for us because of a confluence of events. The Cogan 1500 hr rule and the availability of 717s for almost free. One of those factors is being lobbied hard in Congress to be removed. How long do you think that 1500 hr rule will remain? Never underestimate the power of big money influencing government.
So when the Regionals start hiring 900, 750, even 250 hr guys again, those 76 seaters become more viable. Why would we allow more? Furthermore, why is it not the stated goal of our UNION that every Delta passenger be flown by Delta pilots? Isn't that the purpose of a UNION? |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 2197071)
Meanwhile Gerry threw out the number 8000. He just throws stuff out there hoping something is correct trying to promote his DPA agenda.
WN pilots fly wayyyy more block hours per pilot by the way. Those guys work freaking hard, even with trips touching.
Originally Posted by Elliot
(Post 2197072)
Jerry's numbers are exaggerated, maybe for effect, but they're still wrong. He will never prove his numbers or show his math when called out on it, and loses the message with constant unsubstantiated rumors. Frankly, it has gotten old. I have NEVER been a fan of Doesn't Provide Anything for its membership, but Jerry just helps solidify the decision.
|
Originally Posted by 404yxl
(Post 2197475)
Please explain to us mathematically how his numbers are way off. Southwest doesn't allow any 50-76 seat flying to be outsourced and has trip touching. Those alone would push the numbers to 5000-6000 more pilots. Remember, the 4000+ pilots at Delta Connection are operating under more efficient staffing requirements at Delta.
How exactly are is numbers wrong? Over 4000 pilots are outsourced on 50-76 seat jets. Southwest doesn't allow this. Explain how he is wrong, please. Making up names for DPA only furthers the idea you are wrong. You and Gerry's fuzzy math aside, let's do some real math since this is what you two are cheering for: The DPA has a bit over 3100 ACTIVE cards. By their count, they need 6700 ACTIVE (not members like their strangely similar to RH and CC's biased graphs like to emphasize) cards to get a vote. The real number is rapidly approaching and will exceed 7000 ACTIVE cards needed as hiring continues. 6 years in and the active card count dwindles further away from a vote... |
Originally Posted by gzsg
(Post 2197443)
In their last negotiation the American pilots did not allow the negotiating commuter to discuss scope. Same at United.
80 what are your cost estimates for the upcoming scope concessions I listed? |
Originally Posted by 404yxl
(Post 2197475)
Please explain to us mathematically how his numbers are way off. Southwest doesn't allow any 50-76 seat flying to be outsourced and has trip touching. Those alone would push the numbers to 5000-6000 more pilots. Remember, the 4000+ pilots at Delta Connection are operating under more efficient staffing requirements at Delta.
How exactly are is numbers wrong? Over 4000 pilots are outsourced on 50-76 seat jets. Southwest doesn't allow this. Explain how he is wrong, please. Making up names for DPA only furthers the idea you are wrong. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 2197506)
Your "upcoming" scope concessions are just throwing crap against the wall and hoping something sticks. It's not even worth addressing since you don't deal in reality.
Hoping I'm wrong. :( BTW I sleep so much better at night now that I am once again "furlough protected." :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 2197501)
You and Gerry's fuzzy math aside...
It's very telling that you continually ignore to answer that and then just bash DPA. I didn't even care to bring up DPA until you repeatedly turn it into a DPA bashfest instead of answering a legitimate claim. Explain to us mathematically how his numbers are way off. Southwest doesn't allow any 50-76 seat flying to be outsourced and has trip touching. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:19 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands