Link to TA....
10-08-2016 | 05:16 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 53
Link to TA....
Why was it deleted? Gotta vote for it so you know what's in it?
Fortunately, got my hands on a copy. If people truly care about scope more than industry standard pay, this will go down. Section 1 is setup to further reduce our wide body flying. Good thing our friends in Australia, China, Mexico, Korea, Brazil, Italy, India, France, United Kingdom and Amsterdam are willing to do that flying for us
Apologies to any of our JV friends I may have missed.
Fortunately, got my hands on a copy. If people truly care about scope more than industry standard pay, this will go down. Section 1 is setup to further reduce our wide body flying. Good thing our friends in Australia, China, Mexico, Korea, Brazil, Italy, India, France, United Kingdom and Amsterdam are willing to do that flying for us
Apologies to any of our JV friends I may have missed.
10-08-2016 | 06:57 AM
#5
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
It was deleted shortly after it was posted. I'm guessing it was an unauthorized leak? The document wasn't finalized? I downloaded the copy, but after about 20 of 505 pages my eyes started glazing over and I decided that I'll wait for the summaries from smarter brains than mine.
10-08-2016 | 07:32 AM
#6
Snake
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Looks like the Council 1 chairman leaked it. This is ridiculous. He didn't even bother to clean up the trail of crumbs that lead right back to his desk.
"No, I haven't seen your cookies. I hate cookies. Nom nom."
Who benefits from violating the policy manual in this manner? The objective should be for every pilot to make a rational decision, but Jon Lewis is opposed to that. Shameful and dishonorable behavior.
"No, I haven't seen your cookies. I hate cookies. Nom nom."
Who benefits from violating the policy manual in this manner? The objective should be for every pilot to make a rational decision, but Jon Lewis is opposed to that. Shameful and dishonorable behavior.
10-08-2016 | 07:44 AM
#7
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 95
From: DAL 330
It was deleted shortly after it was posted. I'm guessing it was an unauthorized leak? The document wasn't finalized? I downloaded the copy, but after about 20 of 505 pages my eyes started glazing over and I decided that I'll wait for the summaries from smarter brains than mine.
Yes - We deleted it. It appears that the anonymity feature of APC was used to leak a document get it out. Someone created an APC account and posted a link to the leaked TA with their first post. User since banned.
It appeared on Chit Chat a few minutes later. If someone wants to get the info out on Chit Chat - let them post it there under there own name.
Please do not post it until it is officially released, which should be about a week.
Scoop
10-08-2016 | 08:00 AM
#8
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 53
Looks like the Council 1 chairman leaked it. This is ridiculous. He didn't even bother to clean up the trail of crumbs that lead right back to his desk.
"No, I haven't seen your cookies. I hate cookies. Nom nom."
Who benefits from violating the policy manual in this manner? The objective should be for every pilot to make a rational decision, but Jon Lewis is opposed to that. Shameful and dishonorable behavior.
"No, I haven't seen your cookies. I hate cookies. Nom nom."
Who benefits from violating the policy manual in this manner? The objective should be for every pilot to make a rational decision, but Jon Lewis is opposed to that. Shameful and dishonorable behavior.
10-08-2016 | 08:12 AM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,556
Likes: 11
10-08-2016 | 08:17 AM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 188
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
