But we can't see links to the full TA???

I guess we can only see links to the good parts, not the whole thing.

 

Actually I think you are PD and Jerry's love child.


You give us incessant one line whines with the flavor of Purple Drank.

 

Insult, deflect, still won't answer question.

 

hmmmmm deflect? mmmmmm deflecting from what?

Insult? mmmmmmm no again, just calling it like I see it.

Won't answer the question?

Well OK. We have a process in place to provide the complete TA. That process failed us last July. You were pizzed then. Now you want a repeat of that.


What's your agenda? (Rhetorical in case you can't read between the lines)

You must be orgasmic now that the process and confidentiality has been breached. Still doesn't lend any credibility to your alternate organization whatsoever.

 

Time to start a new thread yet?

 

The logical reason would be because the pay rates are already public and available.

 

No, the logical reason would be they think the pay rates are pretty good, so release those now and try to hide the real sh!t in the TA.

 

.
I wish there was a link to make incessantly whiny posters just vanish.
.
You going to hold your breath and stomp your feet if Scoop doesn't let you post the link?
.

 

1. The MEC was made aware that the Section 3 numbers would be released.
2. The pay rate table was not designated as "confidential".
3. It is the first item all pilots look at when they evaluate a contract.
4. A pay rate (and the calculator) is simple math. The impact of Section 1 changes requires a full understanding by the reps before they're released and reps start answering questions about them.
5. Because posting the link was harmful to the pilot group, according to the guy who did it.

 

From Wiki...

In 2013, a study showed that primacy effect is also prominent in decision making based on experience in a repeated choice paradigm, a learning process also known as operant conditioning. The authors showed that there is a large importance to the value of the first reward on subsequent behaviour, a phenomenon they denoted as outcome primacy.

In another study, the subjects received one of two sentences. For example, one may be given "Steve is smart, diligent, critical, impulsive, and jealous." and the other "Steve is jealous, impulsive, critical, diligent, and smart." These two sentences contain the same information. The first one suggests positive trait at the beginning while the second one has negative traits. Researchers found that the subjects evaluated Steve more positive when given the first sentence, compared to the second one.