Profit Sharing Must Read
#11
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
I disagree that the TA produces no changes to PS. See Section 4.I.
Why did the company amend the Delta Pilots Annual Profit Sharing Plan on 1/1/2016? During Section 6 but outside of Section 6 negotiations? Or, was it part of the negotiations and the NC is withholding that information?
The amended language includes the non-contracts' pay in the formula for determining the pilots' profit sharing. However, the non-contracts get only 10% of PTIX up to the previous year's PTIX; they don't get 20% of PTIX until the current year exceeds the previous year's PTIX. The non-contracts 20% portion in 2016 won't kick in until about $5.9B PTIX (or whatever 2015 PTIX was). Therefore, the pilots should be the sole owners of the 10-20% PTIX pool from $2.5-5.9B. That's $340 million the pilots should be splitting 13,000 ways...not 80,000 ways.
So Derry has listed over a BILLION dollars of PTIX the company wants to remove from PS.
I'm concluding that every year going forward will see our PS stripped by about 40% if we allow this TA to go through.
Why did the company amend the Delta Pilots Annual Profit Sharing Plan on 1/1/2016? During Section 6 but outside of Section 6 negotiations? Or, was it part of the negotiations and the NC is withholding that information?
The amended language includes the non-contracts' pay in the formula for determining the pilots' profit sharing. However, the non-contracts get only 10% of PTIX up to the previous year's PTIX; they don't get 20% of PTIX until the current year exceeds the previous year's PTIX. The non-contracts 20% portion in 2016 won't kick in until about $5.9B PTIX (or whatever 2015 PTIX was). Therefore, the pilots should be the sole owners of the 10-20% PTIX pool from $2.5-5.9B. That's $340 million the pilots should be splitting 13,000 ways...not 80,000 ways.
So Derry has listed over a BILLION dollars of PTIX the company wants to remove from PS.
I'm concluding that every year going forward will see our PS stripped by about 40% if we allow this TA to go through.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 316
The company will make a profit. It will just offset it with writedowns and one-time losses. I agree. We are setting a bad precedent by dropping the currency grievance. I also think the unfiled grievance about other employees might have had merit. Otherwise, why is the language changing?
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,867
Likes: 183
The company will make a profit. It will just offset it with writedowns and one-time losses. I agree. We are setting a bad precedent by dropping the currency grievance. I also think the unfiled grievance about other employees might have had merit. Otherwise, why is the language changing?
#16
Management's number one priority is to move Delta out of being classified as a volatile transportation company and into an investment grade company. That requires consistent profitability on a large scale. Their own net worth depends on it.
#17
Are you OK with Delta classifying what historically were one time losses as regular charges? This is being done intentionally to reduce our PS. This goes directly against the intent of the one-time charge item in our PWA and you just want to give them a pass?
Shouldn't we address how these charges are handled going forward?
#18
What you're ignoring is how they classify one time charges. Historically Delta and every other airline handled certain charges as one time charges. Our PWA discounted these one time charges to determine PTIX. Now Delta (the only airline) changed they way they classify these to lower our Profit Sharing. This goes directly against the intent of the PWA. You OK with that?
#19
The company will make a profit. It will just offset it with writedowns and one-time losses. I agree. We are setting a bad precedent by dropping the currency grievance. I also think the unfiled grievance about other employees might have had merit. Otherwise, why is the language changing?
#20
Can't abide NAI
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Not bad for a line guy volunteering as an administrator to serve the pilots and enforce the contract he also works under. In fact, I'm going to have to disagree with your characterization.
Is there any contract administrator who recovered more for their pilots, last year, or any year?
Why is it considered socially acceptable to make allegations that so unfairly represent a volunteer's work product? Why is it acceptable to make up statements about their personal motivations? Did he ever say such a thing? His actions certainly suggest otherwise.
Good administrators stay out of the politics. Perhaps that puts him at odds with where you want to go. Perhaps you just want your friend in the position. You could advocate for the path you want better by stating the improvement you seek rather than making a rather baseless personal attack.
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 10-12-2016 at 08:21 AM. Reason: I underestimated the results of the CA by $14,000,000
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



