![]() |
Originally Posted by taylorswiftfan
(Post 2228863)
Marginally above UAL, right? Like within a standard deviation?
I missed the FedEx rates. Thank you for pointing those out. I saw the planes they don't fly. Makes sense. So, we are doing the concessions for industry-standard rates, right? |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2228925)
So prove your point. Average out the rates in our industry and post them. See if our rates are just average. It will take you about 10 minutes to compile a average from UAL, AMR, SWA, AK. Those will actually be above industry average but it will do. Then show that are rates are average with those. We await your numbers!
I remember you screaming about how SWA is not in our "category" for any comparing. Now it's ok? AK? really? Alaska? Let's not forget SkyWest, that would suit your purpose wouldn't it? Cargo? They don't exist for you, do they? :) |
Originally Posted by Lifeisgood
(Post 2228985)
sailing,
I remember you screaming about how SWA is not in our "category" for any comparing. Now it's ok? AK? really? Alaska? Let's not forget SkyWest, that would suit your purpose wouldn't it? Cargo? They don't exist for you, do they? :) Alaska is a key competitor in the hubs that controls the future for most of the international growth in our future.(LAX SEA) Competing with them is critical for younger pilots. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2228925)
So prove your point. Average out the rates in our industry and post them. See if our rates are just average. It will take you about 10 minutes to compile a average from UAL, AMR, SWA, AK. Those will actually be above industry average but it will do. Then show that are rates are average with those. We await your numbers!
I don't need to make a spreadsheet to know these rates are no better than industry standard. Surely you are not saying they are well above the standard? |
Originally Posted by Lifeisgood
(Post 2228985)
sailing,
I remember you screaming about how SWA is not in our "category" for any comparing. Now it's ok? AK? really? Alaska? Let's not forget SkyWest, that would suit your purpose wouldn't it? Cargo? They don't exist for you, do they? :) |
I gots to know, are you really a fan of TayTay?
|
"Pay Rate Comparison" presentations are only a small portion of an entire contract. Compare the ENTIRE new and improved Delta TA to the new UPS contract in relation to the Defined Benefit Plan (A Fund) paying $126K per year in retirement, 12% B Fund, no PBS scheduling BS, the new OCV vacation rules where a 2 week vacation now results in a guaranteed month off, optional annual 72 hour sick bank cash out, etc etc.
I'd like to see the profitable people movers make a strong push for reinstatement of a well-deserved A Plan vs. eyeing a profit sharing check. Spoke with a Schwab rep the other day to get the facts.... to guarantee our A Plan number of $126K per year for life after retiring at age 65 I'd have to write them a $2.53M check on the day I retired. That's a lot of profit sharing checks. Food for thought. |
Originally Posted by ShutUpNFly
(Post 2229373)
I'd like to see the profitable people movers make a strong push for reinstatement of a well-deserved A Plan vs. eyeing a profit sharing check. Spoke with a Schwab rep the other day to get the facts.... to guarantee our A Plan number of $126K per year for life after retiring at age 65 I'd have to write them a $2.53M check on the day I retired. That's a lot of profit sharing checks. Food for thought.
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 2229389)
I don't have to eat Madagascar Hissing Cockroaches to know that some 'food' is awful. As to a DB plan - hell to the no.
|
Originally Posted by ShutUpNFly
(Post 2229373)
"Pay Rate Comparison" presentations are only a small portion of an entire contract. Compare the ENTIRE new and improved Delta TA to the new UPS contract in relation to the Defined Benefit Plan (A Fund) paying $126K per year in retirement, 12% B Fund, no PBS scheduling BS, the new OCV vacation rules where a 2 week vacation now results in a guaranteed month off, optional annual 72 hour sick bank cash out, etc etc.
I'd like to see the profitable people movers make a strong push for reinstatement of a well-deserved A Plan vs. eyeing a profit sharing check. Spoke with a Schwab rep the other day to get the facts.... to guarantee our A Plan number of $126K per year for life after retiring at age 65 I'd have to write them a $2.53M check on the day I retired. That's a lot of profit sharing checks. Food for thought. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:28 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands