MEC vote
12-08-2016 | 04:11 AM
#41
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 435
Likes: 16
You better hope that nothing important like a merger or significant change in alliances happens in the next 3 years.
Our new MEC chairman is like a sleazy divorce attorney. He never produces a good outcome but sows lots of hate and dicontent along the way! That keeps the billable hours up until the savings accounts are empty.
Our new MEC chairman is like a sleazy divorce attorney. He never produces a good outcome but sows lots of hate and dicontent along the way! That keeps the billable hours up until the savings accounts are empty.
Or maybe you can answer a question: Where would we be if the 12 had not put their feet down? Haven't really seen anybody address that despite numerous mentions.
12-08-2016 | 04:46 AM
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 189
We would have had the contract that we now have 6 months sooner. In the spring the negotiating committee outlined what they felt was achievable to the MEC if they were given the latitude to negotiate it. It's a mirror of the TA. Only when the 12 finally gave that approval did we get a TA.
12-08-2016 | 05:00 AM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,148
Likes: 208
We will find out soon at the C44 Meeting how ATL pilots feel about their MEC Election votes.
Personally I am in favor of recall and will vote accordingly
12-08-2016 | 05:01 AM
#44
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 636
Likes: 13
From: Stretch DC-9 Gear Slinger
We would have had the contract that we now have 6 months sooner. In the spring the negotiating committee outlined what they felt was achievable to the MEC if they were given the latitude to negotiate it. It's a mirror of the TA. Only when the 12 finally gave that approval did we get a TA.
12-08-2016 | 05:22 AM
#46
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 53
we would have had the contract that we now have 6 months sooner. In the spring the negotiating committee outlined what they felt was achievable to the mec if they were given the latitude to negotiate it. It's a mirror of the ta. Only when the 12 finally gave that approval did we get a ta.
1. Profit sharing concessions
2. Additional scope relief beyond what was given
12-08-2016 | 05:24 AM
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: A350
So what typically happens? Is there a wholesale housecleaning of committee chairmen and fpl staff personnel? What happened when Moak ousted JM the first time? Isn't this just a continuation of the process that saw TA1 shot down? Or is this more of an overrun of the White Walkers coming over the Wall? (GOT/NWA reference). I'm so far removed from union politics that I really don't know. I'd appreciate insight from those closer.
12-08-2016 | 05:30 AM
#48
Da Hudge
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
We would have had the contract that we now have 6 months sooner. In the spring the negotiating committee outlined what they felt was achievable to the MEC if they were given the latitude to negotiate it. It's a mirror of the TA. Only when the 12 finally gave that approval did we get a TA.
12-08-2016 | 05:38 AM
#49
Bus driver
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 894
Likes: 9
You're logic is flawed. You are talking about representing the desires of your constituents. Kern voted yes on the TA; 82 percent voted yes on the TA. He is up for recall. And you're in favor of it. That makes great sense Trip7!
12-08-2016 | 05:42 AM
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 189
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
