Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   VS pilot dispute - DL extra sections (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/98949-vs-pilot-dispute-dl-extra-sections.html)

DALFA 12-19-2016 05:37 PM

VS pilot dispute - DL extra sections
 
http://m.atwonline.com/labor/virgin-atlantic-faces-work-rule-over-pilot-representation

What's the rumor going around about ALPA agreeing to fly extra sections if Virgin pilots "flying the contract" causes disruptions?

I'd hope Delta pilots would not be willing to fly these extra sections if that's the case. In the name of "unity" of course.

GogglesPisano 12-19-2016 05:50 PM


Originally Posted by DALFA (Post 2265959)
http://m.atwonline.com/labor/virgin-atlantic-faces-work-rule-over-pilot-representation

What's the rumor going around about ALPA agreeing to fly extra sections if Virgin pilots "flying the contract" causes disruptions?

I'd hope Delta pilots would not be willing to fly these extra sections if that's the case. In the name of "unity" of course.


We just received a fairly detailed Chairman's Letter about this.

I'm confident that this is definitely not "struck work." It's an upstart union trying to takeover from BALPA (hmm, sounds familiar...) BALPA is their CBA and has not condoned any job action.

DALFA 12-19-2016 06:36 PM

Are they trying to takeover? Seems like 70% of their pilots are members of the new union but the company is refusing to recognize them.

trustbutverify 12-19-2016 06:39 PM


Originally Posted by GogglesPisano (Post 2265964)
We just received a fairly detailed Chairman's Letter about this.

I'm confident that this is definitely not "struck work." It's an upstart union trying to takeover from BALPA (hmm, sounds familiar...) BALPA is their CBA and has not condoned any job action.

So what? If the pilots coordinate a job action and it's deemed legal, then shouldn't we support it regardless of the name of the organization acting as the union mouthpiece? A union exists to serve the members, not the other way around.

DALFA 12-19-2016 06:43 PM


Originally Posted by GogglesPisano (Post 2265964)
We just received a fairly detailed Chairman's Letter about this.

I'm confident that this is definitely not "struck work." It's an upstart union trying to takeover from BALPA (hmm, sounds familiar...) BALPA is their CBA and has not condoned any job action.

Think of it this way. If DPA won an election to represent Delta pilots by a 70/30 margin but Delta management refuses to recognize DPA and instead keeps recognizing ALPA instead. That's what's happening with the VS pilots.

Labor law is different in the U.K. and unions are formed & recognized based on card check instead of elections and of course it's much easier to call for a work action.

To me it seems like this is a little payback to Delta management by ALPA for the contract recently negotiated.

DALFA 12-19-2016 06:45 PM


Originally Posted by trustbutverify (Post 2265990)
So what? If the pilots coordinate a job action and it's deemed legal, then shouldn't we support it regardless of the name of the organization acting as the union mouthpiece? A union exists to serve the members, not the other way around.

That's true. Also, BALPA only represents 30% of pilots. In Europe labor law allows for multiple unions to represent a work group. It's Virgin Atlantic that has chosen not to recognize PPU, not the pilots or government.

Jodi 12-19-2016 07:29 PM


Originally Posted by DALFA (Post 2265991)
Think of it this way. If DPA won an election to represent Delta pilots by a 70/30 margin but Delta management refuses to recognize DPA and instead keeps recognizing ALPA instead. That's what's happening with the VS pilots.

Labor law is different in the U.K. and unions are formed & recognized based on card check instead of elections and of course it's much easier to call for a work action.

To me it seems like this is a little payback to Delta management by ALPA for the contract recently negotiated.

That's NOT what is happening to the Virgin pilots; you are either misinformed or purposely lying. Oh yeh, you're a flight attendant who wanted to vote down the contract. Now I remember, You have NO standing.

DALFA 12-19-2016 08:30 PM


Originally Posted by Jodi (Post 2266024)
That's NOT what is happening to the Virgin pilots; you are either misinformed or purposely lying. Oh yeh, you're a flight attendant who wanted to vote down the contract. Now I remember, You have NO standing.

I wanted to vote down what contract? Your TA1 that 2/3 pilots also voted down? Yeah...of course. Those changes to your JV scope would have also impacted my career. Duh!

As far as the rest of the post...

What am I misinformed about? Virgin Atlantic (the company) is refusing to recognize the union that has the support of 70% of their pilots so they're engaging in some type of action (flying the contract).

You don't think that the pilots and their union is right about having gripes against Virgin Atlantic? If 70% of you voted in DPA and Delta said they're still recognizing ALPA would that be ok?

Jodi 12-19-2016 08:47 PM


Originally Posted by DALFA (Post 2266053)
I wanted to vote down what contract? Your TA1 that 2/3 pilots also voted down? Yeah...of course. Those changes to your JV scope would have also impacted my career. Duh!

As far as the rest of the post...

What am I misinformed about? Virgin Atlantic (the company) is refusing to recognize the union that has the support of 70% of their pilots so they're engaging in some type of action (flying the contract).

You don't think that the pilots and their union is right about having gripes against Virgin Atlantic? If 70% of you voted in DPA and Delta said they're still recognizing ALPA would that be ok?

I was referencing your straw vote against the TA we just voted for (82 % I believe). You argued against it, you voted in the APC forum poll against it, and I stand by the remainder of my post. This is not a strike action or an union sanctioned action by VA.

DALFA 12-19-2016 09:26 PM


Originally Posted by Jodi (Post 2266062)
I was referencing your straw vote against the TA we just voted for (82 % I believe). You argued against it, you voted in the APC forum poll against it, and I stand by the remainder of my post. This is not a strike action or an union sanctioned action by VA.

You must be thinking about someone else because I didn't post a single comment for or against TA2.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:39 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands