![]() |
Originally Posted by E175 Driver
(Post 2352055)
envoy's top pay is $108.00 hr. at 18 year plus. Second year AA pay is $119.00hr plus the 8% they just got. Better benefits as well.
Beyond me why we have this old timers working like mules for peanuts. |
Originally Posted by E175 Driver
(Post 2352055)
envoy's top pay is $108.00 hr. at 18 year plus. Second year AA pay is $119.00hr plus the 8% they just got. Better benefits as well.
Beyond me why we have this old timers working like mules for peanuts. |
Agreed. However, it would increase bidding power for said junior captains. But I would take flow versus first or second choice lines at Envoy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Originally Posted by highflyer1980
(Post 2352762)
Agreed. However, it would increase bidding power for said junior captains. But I would take flow versus first or second choice lines at Envoy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Originally Posted by Eject
(Post 2351384)
There are many of us that have turned down job interviews and actual job offers with Legacy carriers in anticipation of a continuous flow of pilots to AA based on contractual numbers.
|
Originally Posted by Iowa Farm Boy
(Post 2358244)
I seriously doubt it. If anyone has turned down an interview or God help them a job offer from DAL, SWA, or UAL based on potentially flowing they don't have the mental capacity to fly airliners.
|
Originally Posted by Eject
(Post 2358274)
So, you think it would be foolish to stay with AA if that meant living in base and not having to commute to a UAL base for the next 25 years? Seems like a rather rational decision, considering an anticipated flow date within 4 months, not to mention the higher percentage of mandatory retirements at AA Vs. UAL/DL over the next 15 years.
But nothing could go wrong, right? |
Originally Posted by chignutsak
(Post 2358412)
So, it's more rational to give up hundreds of seniority numbers, because base?
But nothing could go wrong, right? And of course something could go wrong, this is life in a deteriorating society. But if you cannot control it you just have to save a little cash and enjoy the ride as best you can. |
Originally Posted by chignutsak
(Post 2358412)
So, it's more rational to give up hundreds of seniority numbers, because base? How about something happening that would stop everything in its tracks, and furloughs begin. Someone gets to still remain employed, and someone else one number below him gets to be homebased for many years.
But nothing could go wrong, right? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:02 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands