![]() |
Originally Posted by The Unsub
(Post 2595607)
I call BS on this. airlines will always pick the lowest bidder to save money. Isom is trying to sugar coat the wholly owned airlines to keep people in seats chasing an 8+ year flow while better opportunities are out there in this hiring market.
|
Originally Posted by flyguy727
(Post 2599372)
It's not going to be a matter of lowest bidder. The pipeline of pilots is starting to grow thin. Which means there is a shortage of pilots going to the regional. It's already begun with great lakes. Over the up coming years you'll start regional cutting back on flying, some even filling for bankruptcy. Wholly own will be the last to survive, but eventually they fall pray to the shortage as well.
|
Originally Posted by NoValueAviator
(Post 2599640)
I don't think so man. A major bankruptcy or two will happen and then we'll see the 1500 hour rule "revised" by congress and hundreds of thousands of 300 hour FO's willing to fly for free and with an automatic diversity flow through to the majors pouring in. We need to enjoy the demand > supply situation when it comes to our labor while we can. It's one legislative sea change away from being over in a big way, and rolling back to $10/hr starting pay, no QOL, brutal onesided contract negotiations, and only a lottery shot of getting a call from the majors for FWM.
|
Originally Posted by flyguy727
(Post 2600032)
The one thing we know, and perhaps you haven't notice, i's that Congress works very slow. There has been talk about moving the retirementage to 67 for a couple of years, and still hasn't happen. Congress is too busy with their heads up there behind. But, let's see, hopefully your right, but I'm not holding my breath on it.
Several reps did manage to sneak in a provision for testing and research of single pilot cargo operations, which is bad news. Hopefully ALPA can again challenge this attempt to undermine our labor force. |
Originally Posted by flyguy727
(Post 2600032)
The one thing we know, and perhaps you haven't notice, i's that Congress works very slow. There has been talk about moving the retirementage to 67 for a couple of years, and still hasn't happen. Congress is too busy with their heads up there behind. But, let's see, hopefully your right, but I'm not holding my breath on it.
|
Originally Posted by bigtime209
(Post 2596025)
It goes through the end of next year. My understanding is that their performance has been good.
It has actually been the top performing Eagle carrier. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Av8rPHX
(Post 2604813)
It has actually been the top performing Eagle carrier.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
My belief that isn’t founded in anything believes that as long as any “partner” eagle can do most of their commitment then aag will not cut their legs out from under them. Unless that partner gets bought out by delta. Then all bets are off
|
Originally Posted by Bigpimppilot
(Post 2604845)
My belief that isn’t founded in anything believes that as long as any “partner” eagle can do most of their commitment then aag will not cut their legs out from under them. Unless that partner gets bought out by delta. Then all bets are off
|
Performance isn't apples to apples anyway. Of course a carrier with newer, better maintained equipment and operating out of less dysfunctional hubs is going to have better performance.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:30 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands