![]() |
Originally Posted by JetDoc
(Post 2749056)
You guys seem eager to put the Compass guys out of work for your own personal gain. That's pretty sad.
But like I said earlier. Highly doubt we see lax as a base anytime soon. |
Originally Posted by pinkvisual
(Post 2749185)
Because of those guys and Skywest I’ve been commuting since 2012. Don’t really care about them to be honest.
But like I said earlier. Highly doubt we see lax as a base anytime soon. I think your displeasure is misplaced. Look at Envoy and AA management. You really think Compass or Skywest had anything to do with that? All they did was bid for the flying. To be mad at the pilots is just lunacy. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
No one knew MIA or LGA were opening until a day prior.
|
Originally Posted by pinkvisual
(Post 2749185)
Because of those guys and Skywest I’ve been commuting since 2012. Don’t really care about them to be honest.
But like I said earlier. Highly doubt we see lax as a base anytime soon. |
RW was open and to the point in one of his meetings a few months ago that he believes that LAX is coming back and that it will be announced this summer. When you couple the CRJ departure announcement with Isom stating that AAG wants the WO’s and three regionals of size, it makes sense. He was directly quoted as saying regional fleets of twenty aircraft are not efficient, and that AAG loses hundreds of thousands of dollars of profit per airplane that is flown by another carrier. Do I want LAX as a base? Absolutely. Do I want another twenty airplanes to staff? Nope. More airplanes means more excuses by the company as to why they can’t improve our QOL.
|
Originally Posted by MD-11Loader
(Post 2749302)
RW was open and to the point in one of his meetings a few months ago that he believes that LAX is coming back and that it will be announced this summer. When you couple the CRJ departure announcement with Isom stating that AAG wants the WO’s and three regionals of size, it makes sense. He was directly quoted as saying regional fleets of twenty aircraft are not efficient, and that AAG loses hundreds of thousands of dollars of profit per airplane that is flown by another carrier. Do I want LAX as a base? Absolutely. Do I want another twenty airplanes to staff? Nope. More airplanes means more excuses by the company as to why they can’t improve our QOL.
|
Originally Posted by JetDoc
(Post 2749275)
You choose to commute.
|
I’d be willing to bet compass renews the contract, or if they don’t we repo the planes to Dfw and we have Mesa or Skywest continue the flying in lax. But it’s a very fluid industry and know one actually knows what’s going to happen besides isom and miss Chloe
|
Originally Posted by Timbird
(Post 2748796)
Well she got a jump on seniority haha
|
I don’t know if I’d put 20 airplanes in the hard to staff category. Between transferring the CRJs, it wouldn’t take but a few of the more tired 145s to go back to the desert to solve that.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:46 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands