Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

No More Quicktrade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2020 | 08:05 PM
  #51  
BigZ's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Tyrion
I'm just pointing out that the turnback list is only necessary because we act like this is Thunderdome.
CRJ reserve FOs had a GroupMe thing set up for reserve day swaps, trades and such. The etiquette called for contacting the FO whose flying you are interested in appropriating, and then proceed with the other party's blessing. Or not. Guys would also advise of the assigned trips they were willing to part with in the same group. Worked pretty well, but the overall pilot group was small enough to where it was fairly personal, and constant over the months due to the lack of movement.
Reply
Old 04-02-2020 | 08:06 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Flying is tight all around. Why hose a commuter on reserve just because “the contract says it’s ok”. When I hired on in 2016 I was flying with the 9-12 yr group of pre flow pilots. Honestly it was considered a douche move unless absolutely having to appropriate because you couldn’t drop, P2P, or trade a trip. And it was explained usually try to contact the other pilot first. Never saw it in ORD. Seen it way too much in dfw, especially by LCA’s living in base hosing reserve commuters just because they could. With so little flying now, why be the blue falcon? Smh To each their own.
Reply
Old 04-02-2020 | 08:13 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Gooch
Flying is tight all around. Why hose a commuter on reserve just because “the contract says it’s ok”. When I hired on in 2016 I was flying with the 9-12 yr group of pre flow pilots. Honestly it was considered a douche move unless absolutely having to appropriate because you couldn’t drop, P2P, or trade a trip. And it was explained usually try to contact the other pilot first. Never saw it in ORD. Seen it way too much in dfw, especially by LCA’s living in base hosing reserve commuters just because they could. With so little flying now, why be the blue falcon? Smh To each their own.
pffft the 9-12 year flows in 2016 were the guys mostly appropriating trips.
Reply
Old 04-02-2020 | 08:22 PM
  #54  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Gooch
Flying is tight all around. Why hose a commuter on reserve just because “the contract says it’s ok”. When I hired on in 2016 I was flying with the 9-12 yr group of pre flow pilots. Honestly it was considered a douche move unless absolutely having to appropriate because you couldn’t drop, P2P, or trade a trip. And it was explained usually try to contact the other pilot first. Never saw it in ORD. Seen it way too much in dfw, especially by LCA’s living in base hosing reserve commuters just because they could. With so little flying now, why be the blue falcon? Smh To each their own.
Honestly, if you see appropriation as 'hosing' anyone, you fall under the 'I don't understand LOA 13-13' crowd. No offense.
Reply
Old 04-02-2020 | 08:23 PM
  #55  
Tyrion's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Flying with my right hand again
Default

Originally Posted by BigZ
CRJ reserve FOs had a GroupMe thing set up for reserve day swaps, trades and such. The etiquette called for contacting the FO whose flying you are interested in appropriating, and then proceed with the other party's blessing. Or not. Guys would also advise of the assigned trips they were willing to part with in the same group. Worked pretty well, but the overall pilot group was small enough to where it was fairly personal, and constant over the months due to the lack of movement.
Exactly... thanks for sharing that... That's the kind of thinking we need around here.

We are heading for some dark times. We need things like that to pull together and help each other out. If we all just act like starving dogs and do douchebag things screwing each other over because it says we can in the contract and I have a PhD in DECS programming, this place is going to be absolutely miserable for most of us. Nobody knows how high up the furloughs will go and who will end up on perpetual airport standby when September ends.

Hopefully the douchebag with the all the extra OT and 25 days of reservecation will chip in a few bucks to our furlough GoFundMe page... probably not.
Reply
Old 04-02-2020 | 08:37 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by buddies8
I'm not sure but I dont think psa and pdt use decs.
PSA and PDT do not use DECS. Those guys are just as wide eyed as the street hires at AA when trying to learn the antiquated system. DECS is a Legacy AA/Legacy Eagle deal.
Reply
Old 04-02-2020 | 10:02 PM
  #57  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 102
From: Whale FO
Default

Originally Posted by Cyio
Of course. I pleaded with the MEC to not fall into managment trap again thinking if we help them they will help us. Once again I’m proven right about them.

Also the extension was given so that proves the April 3rd date was a squeeze tactic as well.
What the heck are you talking about?
The extension was known and was mentioned in the union call, no squeeze tactics. A majority of pilots wanted it, we gave away nothing for it (FYI: This QT issue is separate), so the fact that you do not like it does not change the outcome.
There are no handshake deals with this management. The pilot group wanted the LOA (by a pretty considerable margin), so they got it.
Reply
Old 04-03-2020 | 05:54 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dera
What the heck are you talking about?
The extension was known and was mentioned in the union call, no squeeze tactics. A majority of pilots wanted it, we gave away nothing for it (FYI: This QT issue is separate), so the fact that you do not like it does not change the outcome.
There are no handshake deals with this management. The pilot group wanted the LOA (by a pretty considerable margin), so they got it.
Really, the pilot group wanted it??

How was this determined? ​​​​​​​What were the numbers?

NO one I have talked to thought the hours were reasonable. Sure, “if it works for you take it, other wise don’t”. They would get a lot more takers if the hours were more realistic. Everyone I have discussed this with said, not for that when I can get paid 75 to sit reserve and not fly.
Reply
Old 04-03-2020 | 06:08 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,174
Likes: 157
Default

Originally Posted by dera
What the heck are you talking about?
The extension was known and was mentioned in the union call, no squeeze tactics. A majority of pilots wanted it, we gave away nothing for it (FYI: This QT issue is separate), so the fact that you do not like it does not change the outcome.
There are no handshake deals with this management. The pilot group wanted the LOA (by a pretty considerable margin), so they got it.
I heard a handful of people that wanted it on the call. Can you provide some sort of voting number to prove most wanted it? Did you get 2500 emails with the majority wanting this? The answer is no, the MEC heard what they wanted to hear and once again the company played us.

It is not a coincidence that they closed qt after you all signed it. They know if they closed it first you never would have agreed to the loa.

Stop thinking they have any of our best interest in mind. I know you have a lot of pressure right now but we can’t be short sighted on these deals. Every deal offered by managment had a motive and I haven’t found one that is in our favor. You can say this didn’t have any concessions but it did in that if enough take it we won’t be able to get a deal for the majority of the pilot group. The company hopes to have enough sign up for this crappy 19 hour deal they don’t have to come back to the table.

Whatever though, it’s too late now and we will just have to wait and see. Hopefully enough realize this deal was stupid and they have to come back.
Reply
Old 04-03-2020 | 06:09 AM
  #60  
Tyrion's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Flying with my right hand again
Default

Originally Posted by dera
. The pilot group wanted the LOA (by a pretty considerable margin), so they got it.
I think there is a big disconnect in communication and understanding here. It is a huge overstatement to say that the pilot group "wanted" the LOA. I haven't talked with anyone who "wanted" this LOA. They just don't oppose it. It is an overwhelming "meh".

The generally feeling is that there is no reason to object to it. There is no reason to block it if a few guys desperately need to take an LOA. However, most people generally seem to agree that it is not something worth accepting. It is better just to bid reserve and get paid 75 hours to also not fly. Maybe pick up a couple hours of overtime, if you can figure out how on DECS.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Smutter
Envoy Airlines
10993
01-06-2023 04:20 PM
ParkingatMIA
Envoy Airlines
1
10-06-2019 12:36 PM
highfarfast
Envoy Airlines
30
11-02-2018 01:33 PM
Naviator
Envoy Airlines
10
06-29-2018 06:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices