![]() |
Originally Posted by SoaringSW
(Post 3172086)
Does the flow (hiring at AA) only start after all 1600+ furloughed pilots are recalled?
American Airlines captain explains why it may take 12 months to bring back furloughed pilotsPUBLISHED THU, OCT 1 20209:15 AM EDTUPDATED THU, OCT 1 202012:00 PM EDT And at that, it’s simpler and cheaper to do recalls than new type ratings. And with fleets with multiple type ratings - like American - the training requirements as people change types are more extensive than simple recurrency training. There are only so many sims and trainers and whatever equipment is doing the most flying - which right now is the junior equipment - is the limiting factor in recalling people. Nothing happens quickly. |
Originally Posted by ERAUAV8TR
(Post 3171513)
For many years I wondered whats the point of the flow? Some pilots say “Plan B”, some say only hope to majors (skeletons?), some say only gateway to AA.
However, prior to covid, envoy flow was about to be severely throttled to 15, thus increasing dramatically off the street new hires, making outside regional hiring greater...moreover looking at skywest pilot averages, he or she only spent 3-4 years on property. Much shorter than the made up 5.5 years that will never occur. Last flowed was eagle hire at 8 years. Since no one at envoy has flowed, whats the point? Additionally, some have concluded that other airlines like dal or ual are reluctant to hire envoyers do to thinking of their AA fandom. Thus, little outside attrition exists compared to other regionals. Wouldn’t the regional prison sentence be shorter without the flow? Just look at other regionals averages! |
Originally Posted by THKooj
(Post 3171544)
Being an American pilot on day one of indoc at Envoy is not an easy path to navigate. Those that get through were thoroughly vetted and as I've mentioned many times here before, the criteria was put out and the Envoy recruitment team had to go to work.
|
Originally Posted by Finessed
(Post 3172066)
what’s the point of spending six figures to earn a bachelor’s?
|
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 3172230)
Anyone who spends over $100k to earn a degree is an idiot (medical doctors excluded)
It comes down to the degree you hold, and from where do you hold it. I’d say the best degree for the price I’ve ever seen is in state tuition, University of Texas, Finance program. They have a substantial amount of grads who work for the likes of Goldman Sacks and other Wall Street banks. Not to mention wall street is starting to move down to Texas if you’ve read the recent news. |
Originally Posted by Sperrysan
(Post 3172118)
I doubt many people will actually leave given the climate right now. Pilots and jets are very similar. Both filled with hot air.
As for Captains pretty much everyone I've talked to has shifted to jump ship asap mentality especially if they have their 1,000 pic (for whatever that's worth now). Personally I've always had my eyes on the LCC's for the QOL but I know in the past I was in the minority. |
Originally Posted by Finessed
(Post 3172241)
Then we have a ton of idiots in this country.
Originally Posted by Finessed
(Post 3172241)
No way you don’t break $100,000 if you attend out of state. In state a tuition, cheapest I’ve seen is $9,000 a semester which would ring you up around $70,000 after it’s all said and done (state schools normally). Obviously scholarships can mitigate some costs.
|
If you look at it dispassionately, AA doesn’t WANT to flow people, because it is more costly to them than a military or OTS hire.
No major has a serious problem getting applicants. But in order to flow someone AA not only must train the person they pick up but backfill that person’s slot at the WO, which means recruiting and training costs for the replacement. If AA can instead pick up some competing regional guy, not only do they get the guy for nothing but the other guys regional will have to recruit and train the replacement. It’s a two-fer, they save money by not having to replace the WO regional guy and cost the competition by making them find and train a replacement. And retiring/separating military pilots? Millions of dollars of taxpayer funded training? People who have mostly NEVER been in a union? Many with a pension and healthcare benefits already? They can’t snap those up quick enough. so yeah, it’s not - and never will be - about staffing the major. It’s about keeping the WO guys there long enough that they get senior enough that it’s easier to just not make the jump to the major where they’ll go back to being on reserve in the junior base and be furlough-bait for the next downturn. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:35 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands