CNN
#101
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
I see someone has mentioned RTP pilots, does anyone have any input on direct entry captains or forcibly upgraded captains? I'd imagine CNN could put out another hit piece about how Envoy was upgrading first officers against their will back in 2019, even going so far as to implementing a LoA that forced near-minimum time FOs who were trying to avoid the upgrade by simply not getting their hours.
https://www.flyingmag.com/story/news...oy-air-safety/
#102
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
I see someone has mentioned RTP pilots, does anyone have any input on direct entry captains or forcibly upgraded captains? I'd imagine CNN could put out another hit piece about how Envoy was upgrading first officers against their will back in 2019, even going so far as to implementing a LoA that forced near-minimum time FOs who were trying to avoid the upgrade by simply not getting their hours.
Not saying they're responsible for the letter, but the idea of forcibly upgrading people to the left seat made me question how safe they would be as PICs at the time.
Not saying they're responsible for the letter, but the idea of forcibly upgrading people to the left seat made me question how safe they would be as PICs at the time.
But I’m certainly not condoning a forced upgrade. Whether or not a lot will admit it, there’s a lot you just don’t get to see with someone else that has more experience if you move over to the left seat with minimum required experience. There is a BIG learning curve.
#104
Maybe they should tell the company to stop mid-day rest layovers when there are reserve pilots available. Or when you have a long sit in another base and want to burn a commuter hotel for a day room but they don’t let you because “there are adequate rest facilities in the crew room.”
#105
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
You can argue that forced upgrades put people in the left seat who don't want to do it and maybe aren't up to it.
But you can also argue that forced upgrades put the most experienced pilots (on average) in the left seat, rather than letting them bypass and pushing upgrade further down the list to less experienced (on average) pilots. AA mainline had a mandatory upgrade policy for a long time... you upgraded when a few people junior to you took it.
And fundamentally, airlines hire people to be CA's... they shouldn't be hiring anyone knowing he/she is a career FO. And you shouldn't take the job expecting to be a career FO either... odds are good you can do that if you want but junior-manning happens sometimes.
If you wanted to mostly ignore seniority, you could come up with an arbitrary junior-manning scheme which prioritized pilots based on their experience... TT, 121, turbojet, etc. So instead of upgrading a CFI at legal mins because his number came up, you could instead upgrade the guy with 10K and previous 121 TPIC, etc. But again, seniority.
#108
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 552
Likes: 1
Double-edged sword.
You can argue that forced upgrades put people in the left seat who don't want to do it and maybe aren't up to it.
But you can also argue that forced upgrades put the most experienced pilots (on average) in the left seat, rather than letting them bypass and pushing upgrade further down the list to less experienced (on average) pilots. AA mainline had a mandatory upgrade policy for a long time... you upgraded when a few people junior to you took it.
And fundamentally, airlines hire people to be CA's... they shouldn't be hiring anyone knowing he/she is a career FO. And you shouldn't take the job expecting to be a career FO either... odds are good you can do that if you want but junior-manning happens sometimes.
If you wanted to mostly ignore seniority, you could come up with an arbitrary junior-manning scheme which prioritized pilots based on their experience... TT, 121, turbojet, etc. So instead of upgrading a CFI at legal mins because his number came up, you could instead upgrade the guy with 10K and previous 121 TPIC, etc. But again, seniority.
You can argue that forced upgrades put people in the left seat who don't want to do it and maybe aren't up to it.
But you can also argue that forced upgrades put the most experienced pilots (on average) in the left seat, rather than letting them bypass and pushing upgrade further down the list to less experienced (on average) pilots. AA mainline had a mandatory upgrade policy for a long time... you upgraded when a few people junior to you took it.
And fundamentally, airlines hire people to be CA's... they shouldn't be hiring anyone knowing he/she is a career FO. And you shouldn't take the job expecting to be a career FO either... odds are good you can do that if you want but junior-manning happens sometimes.
If you wanted to mostly ignore seniority, you could come up with an arbitrary junior-manning scheme which prioritized pilots based on their experience... TT, 121, turbojet, etc. So instead of upgrading a CFI at legal mins because his number came up, you could instead upgrade the guy with 10K and previous 121 TPIC, etc. But again, seniority.
#110
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



