Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Envoy Airlines
Envoy FOs to possibly get $20k retention! >

Envoy FOs to possibly get $20k retention!

Search
Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Envoy FOs to possibly get $20k retention!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2015, 06:27 AM
  #41  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Justrun View Post
Do you get off on seeing an airline shutdown and thousands of people lose their jobs? It seems that way.
Not going to happen. AAG couldn't reallocate all Envoy's feed in that time frame (next year). The ground operation is branching out to service other carriers and normal turnover there is moderate to high. The flight department is destined for consolidation with another carrier. Envoy will continue steady contraction though before that happens, which doesn't bode well for F/O upgrades and even possibly some very junior captain downgrades (not to include those in NYC who choose downgrade for commuting purposes). The AA flow will go through another hiatus next year as the remainder of AA furloughees return who plan to, but how many is a wild card. There are perhaps 900 who must make that decision and if even 1/3 choose to return, that could take 7-8 months at a steady 40/month.

I think the remainder of the 824 will cross the fence before consolidation (all gone by early 2017), but once consolidation occurs and seniority is them determined, any new flow will mean previous legacy Envoy pilots who had ball-parked their flow to AA based on the "protected pilot" agreement will then have that recalculated to include all pilots at the merged carrier if it is a wholly-owned. If Envoy flight is shrunk to whatever point and then divested to a non wholly-owned regional, all bets are off on flow to AA. At the time of consolidation, Envoy will be a two fleet carrier with no more than 1000 total pilots and likely less. I could see 40 E-175's and 40 E-145's by early-mid 2017 divided between DFW and ORD.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 03-30-2015, 06:35 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Left
Posts: 1,809
Default

Originally Posted by RJ Pilot View Post
Another envoy thread hijacked by psa pilots. Wow! First they get envoy planes and now they are taking their own threads. What's next?

Good luck!
You truly are a D bag of the highest order.

YOU started the PSA conversation, and now post this just to stir the pot?

No one is taking your bait, you are worthless scum. I hope your GV(E145) job is going well.
pagey is offline  
Old 03-30-2015, 06:38 AM
  #43  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by tom11011 View Post
But you would agree though for right now the PSA strategy is apparently sound. I'm hearing classes of 30-40 every two weeks pushing through. PSA must be doing something right. My point is at some point in the future maybe the strategy changes (bonuses, higher pay, something else, etc..) but for right now they seem to be hitting the mark if these hiring numbers are accurate.
Temporary. AAG's regional network in TOTAL is contracting, so what one carrier might be achieving now isn't a good overall litmus for the grand scheme. What's occurring now is simply a morphing of the model. Some expand while others contract, but the overall networks present size can not be supported in the future. It will steadily shrink. At some point, the musical chairs approach by pilots will not produce the desired results (quicker upgrade) and the music will stop for the most part. Where a pilot is when that happens depends on the risks they took and the timing. The future newbies will steadily dwindle as well. At some point in the near future, a different approach will be necessary for all three legacies regarding their regional networks.

I think mainline 100-seaters (Group 1 @ AA) will be tapped to provide a good portion of former regional flying in the future by all three legacies. Both United and AAG are in fact, exploring that as we speak. AA has only 20 E-190's (Group 1) and despite those being mostly allocated for specific east coast shuttle duty, that is too small a fleet for a 1000 aircraft airline. The regionals won't disappear but return to a much smaller component as it used to be.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 03-30-2015, 06:45 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,940
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
Temporary. AAG's regional network in TOTAL is contracting, so what one carrier might be achieving now isn't a good overall litmus for the grand scheme. What's occurring now is simply a morphing of the model. Some expand while others contract, but the overall networks present size can not be supported in the future. It will steadily shrink. At some point, the musical chairs approach by pilots will not produce the desired results (quicker upgrade) and the music will stop for the most part. Where a pilot is when that happens depends on the risks they took and the timing. The future newbies will steadily dwindle as well. At some point in the near future, a different approach will be necessary for all three legacies regarding their regional networks.

I think mainline 100-seaters (Group 1 @ AA) will be tapped to provide a good portion of former regional flying in the future by all three legacies. Both United and AAG are in fact, exploring that as we speak. AA has only 20 E-190's (Group 1) and despite those being mostly allocated for specific east coast shuttle duty, that is too small a fleet for a 1000 aircraft airline. The regionals won't disappear but return to a much smaller component as it used to be.
I agree with your assessment.
tom11011 is offline  
Old 03-30-2015, 06:53 AM
  #45  
Does NOT get weekends off
 
snippercr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ERJ - 145
Posts: 1,631
Default

Originally Posted by pagey View Post
You truly are a D bag of the highest order.

YOU started the PSA conversation, and now post this just to stir the pot?

No one is taking your bait, you are worthless scum. I hope your GV(mom's basement playing FSX with a GV addon she paid for) job is going well.
Hey come on, for RJ Pilot standards, that was actually pretty clever. Not that I disagree with you. In fact I even fixed your post.
snippercr is offline  
Old 03-30-2015, 07:11 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,204
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
Not going to happen. AAG couldn't reallocate all Envoy's feed in that time frame (next year). The ground operation is branching out to service other carriers and normal turnover there is moderate to high. The flight department is destined for consolidation with another carrier. Envoy will continue steady contraction though before that happens, which doesn't bode well for F/O upgrades and even possibly some very junior captain downgrades (not to include those in NYC who choose downgrade for commuting purposes). The AA flow will go through another hiatus next year as the remainder of AA furloughees return who plan to, but how many is a wild card. There are perhaps 900 who must make that decision and if even 1/3 choose to return, that could take 7-8 months at a steady 40/month.

I think the remainder of the 824 will cross the fence before consolidation (all gone by early 2017), but once consolidation occurs and seniority is them determined, any new flow will mean previous legacy Envoy pilots who had ball-parked their flow to AA based on the "protected pilot" agreement will then have that recalculated to include all pilots at the merged carrier if it is a wholly-owned. If Envoy flight is shrunk to whatever point and then divested to a non wholly-owned regional, all bets are off on flow to AA. At the time of consolidation, Envoy will be a two fleet carrier with no more than 1000 total pilots and likely less. I could see 40 E-175's and 40 E-145's by early-mid 2017 divided between DFW and ORD.
The only problem is that the "protected pilots" agreement it says that is for anyone on Envoy seniority list before 10-11-2011. They can recalculate the hires after that date, not before.

Other than that I think you're right.
PilotJ3 is offline  
Old 03-30-2015, 07:20 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Fo...md80
Posts: 112
Default

I don't post much here, but keep abreast of what is going on at the regionals, envoy in particular . I spent 10.5 years at metro/ eagle prior to being hired at AA in 2000. I believe the group1 aircraft order at AA, and likely at DL and UAL is the most likely outcome of the shortage now happening at the regionals. Group 1 pay is less(obviously) than 2.. But is a living wage for FO, and the equivalent of mid level group 2 FO for CA. Will be the entry level seat at AA.
As a comparison... I made $21.60 after 6 months on a jetstream, 25 years ago.. Mesa starting pay..$22.00... Shameful... And THAT is the root cause of the shortage!!
Regards, and best of luck to us all
Marlin is offline  
Old 03-30-2015, 08:14 AM
  #48  
Does NOT get weekends off
 
snippercr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ERJ - 145
Posts: 1,631
Default

Originally Posted by Marlin View Post
I don't post much here, but keep abreast of what is going on at the regionals, envoy in particular . I spent 10.5 years at metro/ eagle prior to being hired at AA in 2000. I believe the group1 aircraft order at AA, and likely at DL and UAL is the most likely outcome of the shortage now happening at the regionals. Group 1 pay is less(obviously) than 2.. But is a living wage for FO, and the equivalent of mid level group 2 FO for CA. Will be the entry level seat at AA.
As a comparison... I made $21.60 after 6 months on a jetstream, 25 years ago.. Mesa starting pay..$22.00... Shameful... And THAT is the root cause of the shortage!!
Regards, and best of luck to us all
My understanding is that there is no order planned for group 1 aircraft and that Parker even said having the 20 190s is too small to justify the fleet.
snippercr is offline  
Old 03-30-2015, 08:32 AM
  #49  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by PilotJ3 View Post
The only problem is that the "protected pilots" agreement it says that is for anyone on Envoy seniority list before 10-11-2011. They can recalculate the hires after that date, not before.

Other than that I think you're right.
You're assuming that this or any other contractual provisions in your current CBA will survive the consolidation. Don't bet on that. This among other things (like 18-year pay scales) are among the very reasons AAG is putting Envoy in the position it is now in and why it is positioning it for consolidation. They plan to eliminate the remaining uncompetitive aspects of Envoy. It would be counter productive to the acquiring entity to transfer Envoy pilots to a new entity that would acquire its assets and set up and "us and them" situation among the pilots whereby former Envoy have special rights not granted others (or grandfathered to unnecessary higher pay scales).

You can expect that if you choose to transfer at the time of acquisition of remaining Envoy assets, you'll have to accept employment under the acquirers pilots CBA and that includes their pay scales (18-year won't exist), the flow structure then in place or one negotiated to benefit all pilots based on seniority without favor and seniority to be arbitrated. You of course will have the option to decline those requirements and seek employment elsewhere. AAG isn't going to consolidate the dinosaur Envoy (AAG's belief of their competitive pilot labor costs and benefits relative to the industry) and retain all their albatrossian aspects or create a caste system within the consolidated carrier. Your MEC will agree to whatever terms are offered as the other option would be far worse for the pilots.

They will have no choice.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 03-30-2015, 08:34 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 219
Default

Originally Posted by snippercr View Post
My understanding is that there is no order planned for group 1 aircraft and that Parker even said having the 20 190s is too small to justify the fleet.
No current order.

Parker stated that the 190's will either grow or go away.
jdflyer1999 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satpak77
Envoy Airlines
82
03-25-2020 05:55 AM
Crawl
Envoy Airlines
553
10-09-2014 10:36 AM
DFWEMB
Envoy Airlines
48
02-03-2014 09:52 AM
DLax85
Cargo
35
04-23-2008 09:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices