![]() |
Actual DAL Hiring numbers.. UAL is about the same, they told me 8K average for civilian right now, PIC is lower than DAL.. Super quick upgrades won't likely get you even looked at for a Legacy without the TT averages of around 7K anyway.
Attachment 2408 |
Originally Posted by FlameNSky
(Post 1968987)
Yes, that would be true if we had hired an evenly distributed number of pilots each and every month, which is not the case, at any airline, ever. We have very few pilots hired between late 2008 and 2010 and then again from early 2012 to now. A pilot hired today could easily be upgrading or flow just a few month after a pilot hired years ago due to these gaps.
But since you asked, here are some ruff numbers: We just had a vacancy putting our most junior CA at 10/2007 -- 8 years Next year they have conservatively announced they will upgrade 220 CAs. That will make the most junior CA 12 month from now a July 2010 new hire. And that is assuming no other attrition or growth. Considering these two factors, I would guess that in 12 months from now, we will have a October 2010 new hire. In ones years, time the upgrade will drop from 8 years to 6 years. When you look at AA retirements, they are going to be retiring 600 - 800 a year for the foreseeable future. That means in addition to the 300 - 400 FTs next year, there will be another 300 - 400 in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 etc etc. Even if envoy shrinks, there will be somewhere around 250-300 upgrade in 2017. That would make the most junior CA two years from now a July to October 2011 new hire. Still steady at 6 years due to the large hiring during late 2010 to late 2011. But this is where the magic happens. There was not much hiring after 2011. As AA continues to hire and guys flow over to AA, there will be another 250 (conservative estimate) flowing to AA in 2018. That is another 250 upgrades. The most junior CA an early 2014 new hire. 4 year upgrade. There are only 100 pilots junior to a May 2014 on our seniority list today. That means that a pilot hired today would upgrade in early 2019. And these are conservative numbers. We still have Captains/FOs getting hired by United, Delta, JetBlue, Spirit, Virgin America. That is where Ric Wilson's 2.5 year upgrade projections come from. While I agree his projects are on the low side, I do think that a new hire today can expect to upgrade between 2.5 to 3.5 years from today and flow to AA in a 6 to 7 year time frame. These numbers also don't take into consideration that all of Parker's Lowest Bidder Contract Regionals are not able to staff their ASAs and flying is returning to envoy. A 50% increase in block flying done today is coming in the next few month. More Flying + Senior Flowing CAs + Normal experienced CA/FO attrition = a good time to get in on the front side of the wave at envoy. Fleet projections have only been going up as RAH and Mesa have been unable to staff their flying or run on time. Those fleet projections will only be going up as these companies find it harder to staff their flying. Or someone could go to RAH while they figure out their CBA, bankruptcy and what will happen when they cannot staff their obligations to the mainlines. Or someone could go to PSA who have a large number of low time CAs that will be flying there for years before they are competitive for the Majors. Not to mention their low time FO that still don't qualify for upgrade, then when they do upgrade, they will take years to get the experience to be competitive for mainline jobs. Currently competitive hiring experience at United is 7,000 TT/4,000 PIC. How long will a 2,000 hour PSA new hire take to get that kind of experience at 700 hours a year? Mesa isn't much better. On top of all that, a new hire today doesn't have to wait around for the flow. They can still apply at United, Delta or whoever and take other opportunities as they come along. I would guess though, as it becomes harder and harder to staff their regional flying, AA will other greater incentives such as increase flow to attract new hires to it's regionals. A lot is going to be happening in the industry during the next decade. Many assumptions and variables. To me, it seems safe to file a route well clear of the weather and look for direct to your destination if you can rather than risking your career to picking through the buildups. You will probably make it through eventually either way but life really sucks when you are stuck in a sucker hole. |
Originally Posted by boiler07
(Post 1969059)
Ah, nothing like a virgin's first post.
Oh, and nice screen name. Couldn't come up with something more original? |
Originally Posted by RyanP
(Post 1969061)
Good post. Agreed.
It's amazing how people can't see past "current" upgrade and flow times, because they are COMPLETELY irrelevant to what a new hire will experience. When I was hired projections were 3-4 years, went to 10+ With age 65, still had flowbacks, and losing Aircraft plus other problems, then it went back down to as low as 6. We had years without hardly any hiring now since later in 08, which will shorten a newhires timeframe significantly when those big gaps are jumped again, new hires aren't going through the lost decade either and have NEVER seen movement off the top/middle as high as 300-400+ A YEAR!! Upgrade was 10 years right before my upgrade.. But there was such a gap in hiring over the years (similar to what a new hire will experience) that my upgrade time jumped all the way down to around 6.5yrs just due to hiring gaps and getting here on the FRONT end of an 800 pilot hiring wave, even with the bankruptcy and losing tons of aircraft. The guys on the back end of that hiring wave are the ones suffering more back at around 8yrs again.. That is what happens when you get hired behing 600-700 people in a year period. That is a TON of people to upgrade ahead of you, especially when things start to slow, and what these other upgrade mill carriers will be dealing with shortly. The suckers going there still now just don't realize it yet. There is NO way for a new hire to have an 8 year upgrade here (barring another major disaster) if we continue to lose 400+ pilots a year due to flow and outside attrition. (Which we are doing. Easily) Even with more shrinkage.. And as the 175's start coming in the shrinkage is coming to a stop. We have only 2030 pilots, almost a couple hundred of them are inactive, working in training center, management, mil leave or on sick leave. Junior CA award today is #1206 out of 2030 pilots. Upgrades stay around 60% on the seniority list. Do the simple math. 2030 - 400+/yr attrition ahead of you leaving. How many years until you hit the 60% mark to upgrade? Even estimating if we shrink more and junior CA goes from current #1206 down to #900 or so in a couple years.. I bet attrition next year is closer to 500 anyway with the amount of hiring everywhere. We have Higher attrition than any other regional on the planet right now. 300ish flowing, handful of retirements, and 180 or so junior CA and FO's to other LCC and Majors is EASILY doable next year, then the always reliable junior FO upgrade chasers that will leave on top of that. That is 25% of our pilots gone in just 1 yr. If you can't get the pilots to COME to Envoy, then keep the ones you've got. Of course, for that to be successful it means a stagnation scenario of little or no flows and upgrades only as a result of outside attrition and of course, THAT means Envoy cannot shrink in all that process. The best phrase to describe Envoy right now is, "the check is in the mail". :cool: |
Originally Posted by Cujo664
(Post 1969057)
The flow is only going to work until no new hires come in on the bottom. 28 bodies in August is exception rather than a rule. Some of those were more lateral jumpers from Republic. They ain't gonna flow the company outta business.
However, that may change if this new hire-current-regional-pilots campaign of Envoy's takes off. |
I'm not going to quote it, but very well said Flame. You hit the nail on the head.
|
Originally Posted by FlameNSky
(Post 1968920)
Only an idiot would ask this question. A smart pilot would ask what will be envoy's upgrade time in one, two, or three years from now. You know, in 1999 - 2001 many pilots were hired when Am Eagle had upgrade times of two years, many of those new hires spent almost a decade in the right seat. What was PSA's upgrade time before they doubled in size? More importantly, now that they are full of low time Captains unable to compete for mainline jobs and FOs who don't even have enough flight time to upgrade, what will their upgrade time be as the entire airline stagnates?
Many a pilot have been disappointed going to places like RAH or PSA that have current low upgrade times only to realize they have missed the wave. In addition to the announcement that a third of our captains will be leaving for AA next year (in addition to normal attrition), they are returning 12,000 block hours back to envoy in the coming months. That represents an almost 50% growth (return) in flying, combined with 30% - 40% of captains leaving, that adds up to a lot of opportunity for new hires today. A smart pilot flies ahead of the aircraft. |
Originally Posted by FirstClass
(Post 1969293)
lol, I can't wait to see the look on your face when the flow starts having "operational problems". Whatever, enjoy it while you got it, I would. But remember, you have to figure out a way to get the suckers to keep showing for new hire school to make all your flow dreams come true.
They've only got billions to play with. |
Originally Posted by FirstClass
(Post 1969293)
lol, I can't wait to see the look on your face when the flow starts having "operational problems". Whatever, enjoy it while you got it, I would. But remember, you have to figure out a way to get the suckers to keep showing for new hire school to make all your flow dreams come true.
You see, it doesn't matter what you or I think about the flow program or management's trustworthiness. My confidence stems from that fact that Doug Parker, a person who has the ability to MAKE it work, sees it as a solution to his regional staffing problem. Ultimately, I believe that he sees it as a cheaper solution to that problem and his best way to attract pilots to the 50 - 80 seat market. He has the resources and determination to make that happen. Parker ultimately controls who AA hires. He has plainly stated that he will make envoy the quickest route to AA for a student pilot. Consider this scenario: A newly minted ATP pilot with 1800 has to choose between going to envoy or Mesa. He could go to Mesa and maybe upgrade in two years assuming that Mesa doesn't end up in the same situation RAH is in today causing that pilot to have to start over again somewhere else. At year three at Mesa, he will have been a Captain for one year. He will likely have about 3900 hrs Total Time and 700 Hours PIC (assuming an avg time of 700 hrs a year). Had he gone to envoy, he would have the same Total Time but not have the PIC as it probably took him longer to upgrade at envoy (this is still a strong assumption though. Do you think current RAH will see an upgrade any time soon?) Fast Forward three more years into the future. Now the Mesa route would have him in at 6,000 hrs total time and 4,200 hrs PIC. He is finally "competitive" for the major airlines. The envoy route version of this pilot, again has the same total time and 3,500 hrs of PIC in addition to be within one year from flowing to AA. Going with envoy over Mesa (assuming mesa kept the "quick upgrade") only meant having 700 hours less PIC. At that point though, do you really think United or Delta would choose one over the other over just 700 hours of PIC? But what if Delta or United never call? Or you get the interview but don't get a job offer? I know many guys such as myself that have 7,000 - 10,000 hr TT, 2000 - 5000 PIC with no checkride failures or violations that have not gotten a call for an interview. At envoy, it wouldn't matter, you still have that guaranteed slot at AA. Some chasing a quick upgrade think it may fast track their career but they fail to realize that they are still competing with higher time Captains with more experience. Some do get hired at the majors with lower times, but those individuals are the exception, not the rule. Also, at airlines like PSA who have had quick upgrades now have low time Captains that will take years to get the experience needed to get hired, opening up the upgrade opportunity. All pilots are dependent on their company's ability to attract new pilots and their Captains being able to pursue Mainline jobs in order to facilitate their upgrades. Any airline could end up the way RAH is now, unable to hire enough pilots to staff their air service agreements. RAH is the first, but there will be more. And when that happens, stagnation will happen. Only envoy can guarantee that Captains will flow off the top in addition to normal attrition. More importantly though, at envoy, AAG controls our costs and revenue. Places like RAH, Mesa, SkyWest will have to pay their pilots more money out of their 2 - 3% profit margins, limiting what they will be able to offer. That is why the RAH deal offered had big hourly raises but at the expense of other compensation areas. envoy is not limited by a set revenue stream from AAG. Parker could decide overnight that he will need to increase pay in order to make his Flowthrough Regional Staffing Solution work. As the regional pilot staffing crisis deepens, who do you think Parker will spend he money saving, his wholly owned assests or an outside contractor? He has actually already answered this question. In recent months, Mesa and RAH have been unable to fulfill their ASAs and now 12,000 block hours are being returned to envoy. Do you see him trying to bail out or help RAH now with their current situation? No, he has been advertising the flow and return of flying to envoy. The trend has already started and will only increase in the future. Now, another solution that they major airlines have been doing in order to deal with the shortage of pilots is to bring more flying back to mainline. Parker has been very open about the fact that he is delaying the retiring of the S80 fleet in order to help pick up the slack from RAH. As Parker expands the mainline flying, it will again help envoy pilots as they will flow more pilots to mainline to staff those aircraft. Parker knows that the moment that he stops the flows, the envoy newhires will stop and their will be a mass exodus of this pilots. Any benefit that he gets from withholding flowthroughs would be very temporary and counterproductive to his Regional Staffing Solution. For the reason, I don't believe that Parker will ever withhold flowthroughs. In the last 3 years, envoy flowthroughs have made up 68% of AA's newhires. United and Delta hired more pilots in the last month than AA has hired off the street in the last year. Parker has clearly put into practice his stated objective to make his wholly owned airlines, specifically envoy the fastest way to get hired at American. One can say, just wait, just wait all day long, but the fact is, for the last 4 years that AA has been hiring, the flow HAS worked. |
Originally Posted by FirstClass
(Post 1969293)
lol, I can't wait to see the look on your face when the flow starts having "operational problems". Whatever, enjoy it while you got it, I would. But remember, you have to figure out a way to get the suckers to keep showing for new hire school to make all your flow dreams come true.
If I'm an Envoy pilot in that scenario, and let's say I've got 4 years invested in the company (and 4,000+ hours in my logbook), I know I could move on to jetBlue, Spirit, Frontier, or basically a multitude of other "good" flying jobs (corporate, air ambulance, cargo, etc.). The only thing keeping me at Envoy, at that point, is the expectation to be at AA soon. Do you think AA is going to stare down the few regional pilots they have and say, "we know we promised you'd flow, but now we're having operational difficulties, so you'll have to wait. But please stick around making $70K/year because we're nice guys and we'll start it up again soon." Do you think they'd want their regional network to crumble? Because that's how you'd get your regional network to crumble. Guys would start leaving so fast, the operation, which is already struggling without new hires, would be in disarray. The point I'm getting at is that regional feed is becoming extremely valuable. Keeping your regional pilot workforce happy is becoming extremely valuable. So many of the doom and gloomers are stuck in the paradigm of the lost decade. Management was able to use and abuse pilots, and shifted flying constantly. Those days are over. There are far more jobs than there are pilots. They are going to start treating us like the valuable commodity that we are. It's already started, and the retirements are still just a fraction of what they will be. In the Envoy (and Piedmont, and PSA) situation, I think rather than slamming the brakes on the flow, if the wholly owned carriers are unable to hire, mainline will bring the regional aircraft onto their certificates. If they want to keep their RJ's flying, and they want to keep RJ pilots showing up to fill classes, they will give you a mainline job to do it. I think this scenario is probably at least 5 years away, but that's how I predict the regional pilot shortage will be solved. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:48 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands