Search
Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Picking a plane for Envoy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-22-2017, 08:15 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by satpak77 View Post
Thread refresh....can anyone explain why the 145 is "better" ? Assume the applicant lives in Dallas and does not wish to move or commute. Applicant will be age 50 at time of hire.

why would one pay more than another, for a 1st year new hire ? Which one would be quicker to Captain ?

Thank you
There's more 145s than 175. That means better movement, better variety of schedules, better options, quicker upgrades. The 175 gravy train has stopped. I think the guys getting on now will be on reserve or at the bottom for a while. But I don't think you have any more options now anyways, they're hiring mostly into the 145 in LGA. There's the CRJ but that's in Ord and you're basically just keeping the seat warm until they get rid of the plane shortly.
Purpleanga is offline  
Old 04-22-2017, 11:36 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 239
Default

Originally Posted by satpak77 View Post
Thread refresh....can anyone explain why the 145 is "better" ? Assume the applicant lives in Dallas and does not wish to move or commute. Applicant will be age 50 at time of hire.

why would one pay more than another, for a 1st year new hire ? Which one would be quicker to Captain ?

Thank you
The pay scale is the same for FOs regardless of equipment. The company incentivized the 145 and CRJ with an additional $5k bonus due to the SJS happening with the 175...sort of like a consolation prize. Neither is technically "quicker" to captain since you can upgrade into an aircraft you are not currently flying. Impossible to predict what will be junior in 2.5-3 years. Predicting things in the airlines involves too many variables beyond one's control.

Another thing to consider is how well you learn new things. The 175 has a few more "bells and whistles" to manage...more depth to the FMS, autothrust, VNAV, etc. These things sound nice to have, but a pilot must learn to effectively manage them. Pilots have failed transition or new hire training in the 175 due to an inability to grasp the operation of the aircraft or programming of its functions within the allotted training time. Know thyself...and don't take on more than you can chew. The 145 is a bit more forgiving. Factor in your flight experience to this point to help with the decision-making.

One important pro about the 175 is having actual coffee pots.
Whiskey4 is offline  
Old 04-23-2017, 12:55 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by satpak77 View Post
Thread refresh....can anyone explain why the 145 is "better" ? Assume the applicant lives in Dallas and does not wish to move or commute. Applicant will be age 50 at time of hire.

why would one pay more than another, for a 1st year new hire ? Which one would be quicker to Captain ?

Thank you
1. More pay (bonus money only) for the 175 because so many have SJS (shiny jet Syndrome)

2. Both, captain upgrade is base on seniority only. When you can hold the upgrade no matter the jet you will be awarded it. Junior plane right now is the CrJ, then 145, then 175..

More movement right now on the 145.
wiz5422 is offline  
Old 04-24-2017, 10:36 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Position: B787 FO
Posts: 295
Default

Originally Posted by bigtime209 View Post
E175 Driver is the typical Riddle guy that everyone hates flying with.
At least he removed the "Proud former member of the ERAU flight team" from his signature.....I'm embarrassed for my Alma Mater getting a bad name because of guys like him.
TheRaven is offline  
Old 04-24-2017, 10:52 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by TheRaven View Post
At least he removed the "Proud former member of the ERAU flight team" from his signature.....I'm embarrassed for my Alma Mater getting a bad name because of guys like him.
He's not a Riddle guy, he's just trolling. I can't believe people are taking him seriously.
Purpleanga is offline  
Old 04-24-2017, 01:44 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
E175 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Position: E175
Posts: 686
Default

Originally Posted by Purpleanga View Post
He's not a Riddle guy, he's just trolling. I can't believe people are taking him seriously.
Sure Nancy.
E175 Driver is offline  
Old 04-24-2017, 02:38 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by E175 Driver View Post
Sure Nancy.
That's the best you can do? I know you can troll harder.
Purpleanga is offline  
Old 04-24-2017, 08:01 PM
  #28  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 20
Default

Originally Posted by Whiskey4 View Post
The pay scale is the same for FOs regardless of equipment. The company incentivized the 145 and CRJ with an additional $5k bonus due to the SJS happening with the 175...sort of like a consolation prize. Neither is technically "quicker" to captain since you can upgrade into an aircraft you are not currently flying. Impossible to predict what will be junior in 2.5-3 years. Predicting things in the airlines involves too many variables beyond one's control.

Another thing to consider is how well you learn new things. The 175 has a few more "bells and whistles" to manage...more depth to the FMS, autothrust, VNAV, etc. These things sound nice to have, but a pilot must learn to effectively manage them. Pilots have failed transition or new hire training in the 175 due to an inability to grasp the operation of the aircraft or programming of its functions within the allotted training time. Know thyself...and don't take on more than you can chew. The 145 is a bit more forgiving. Factor in your flight experience to this point to help with the decision-making.

One important pro about the 175 is having actual coffee pots.
That's definitely something to consider. I went straight from flight instructing in cessnas/a seminole to training in a 175 and to say it was a bit of jump would be a vast understatement. I made it through but it was a bit rough, especially in the beginning when you're trying to learn all the approach modes and all the autopilot functions. I think the 145 might have been an easier training program given my background.

The biggest thing to remember in training is these three words: Cooperate And Graduate. Don't be a hero and attempt to learn everything about the airplane because that's impossible to do in such a short timeframe. Just do what they tell you, pass the ride, and you can learn all you want and play with the FMS out on the line on a 4 hour trip to YYC.
DollaBillz is offline  
Old 04-25-2017, 08:19 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 618
Default

I was always under the impression that the 175 is easier to learn and has less memory item. besides the approach modes how is it more difficult?
stbloc is offline  
Old 04-26-2017, 01:43 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MD-11Loader's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Pawn
Posts: 1,138
Default

Originally Posted by stbloc View Post
I was always under the impression that the 175 is easier to learn and has less memory item. besides the approach modes how is it more difficult?
There are four memory items on the 145, and much less automation and sophistication than the 175. I went from flight instructing to the 145 and found it to be a fun plane to learn.
MD-11Loader is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lori Clark
Hangar Talk
1
11-02-2016 05:02 PM
ovrtake92
SkyWest
75
07-17-2012 08:40 PM
ryan1234
Hangar Talk
24
04-21-2009 04:46 AM
Squawk8800
Hangar Talk
10
03-06-2008 10:27 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
0
04-14-2007 09:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices