Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   ExpressJet (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/expressjet/)
-   -   Travel Bennies (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/expressjet/120069-travel-bennies.html)

Itsajob 02-27-2019 07:34 PM


Originally Posted by airlinepilot50 (Post 2765762)
You are on the bottom of the list on mainline flights. Even retirees have higher priority. On our own metal, we have higher priority than mainline unless they use vacation passes at the last minute to bump you off. UAL pilots are working hard to have priority on jumpseats for all express carriers.

The argument wasn’t over jumpseat, but the seats in the back. The issue is that passenger seats are sold by United Airlines and that a 30 year employee shouldn’t get bumped by a regional new hire. You can’t go to Mesa or Express Jet and buy a ticket from point A to B. That is through the parent company. Basically, those are United routes, the seats are sold by United Airlines, and often times the airplane itself is owned by United. The various regionals are simply subcontractors paid to cover certain routes. It would be a hard sell to demand priority on another companies jumpseat, but the seats in the back are United seats, and as such United employees should be listed SA1, and the subcontractors falling below that mark.

PhantomHawk 02-27-2019 08:17 PM

The best fix for the whole problem is for United to take over all this flying and do it on mainline aircraft. Then there is no argument over priority.

Itsajob 02-27-2019 09:11 PM


Originally Posted by PhantomHawk (Post 2771948)
The best fix for the whole problem is for United to take over all this flying and do it on mainline aircraft. Then there is no argument over priority.

We’d love to see that but unfortunately I don’t see it happening any time soon. The majors have given up scope too many times over a long period of time. It will most likely take just as long to chip away at taking it back. The current UAL MEC has told management that we won’t give up one seat, or one pound in scope relief in our current negotiations. Hopefully this will force more flying to mainline allowing current employees to advance and others to gain employment. For now we just sit back and watch the show.

airlinepilot50 03-01-2019 08:13 PM


Originally Posted by Itsajob (Post 2771934)
The argument wasn’t over jumpseat, but the seats in the back. The issue is that passenger seats are sold by United Airlines and that a 30 year employee shouldn’t get bumped by a regional new hire. You can’t go to Mesa or Express Jet and buy a ticket from point A to B. That is through the parent company. Basically, those are United routes, the seats are sold by United Airlines, and often times the airplane itself is owned by United. The various regionals are simply subcontractors paid to cover certain routes. It would be a hard sell to demand priority on another companies jumpseat, but the seats in the back are United seats, and as such United employees should be listed SA1, and the subcontractors falling below that mark.

Subcontractors deserve priority over mainline on the routes they cover. Use a vacation pass if you want to bump them off.

airlinepilot50 03-01-2019 08:16 PM


Originally Posted by Itsajob (Post 2771965)
We’d love to see that but unfortunately I don’t see it happening any time soon. The majors have given up scope too many times over a long period of time. It will most likely take just as long to chip away at taking it back. The current UAL MEC has told management that we won’t give up one seat, or one pound in scope relief in our current negotiations. Hopefully this will force more flying to mainline allowing current employees to advance and others to gain employment. For now we just sit back and watch the show.

SK will just continue to order CRJ550s, problem solved.

shayden 03-01-2019 08:47 PM


Originally Posted by PosRateGearUp (Post 2771074)
It actually puts them in a higher priority, as they would be SA0V and express would be SA0X.

Actually SA0X and SA0V are the same priority. There are multiple examples of two different pass travel statuses having equal priority through the United travel program hierarchy. The difference is that most mainline employees have a longer tenure than the express employee. For example an SA0X12 would still be ahead of an SA0V15.

bestdamnpilot 05-04-2019 03:55 AM

Do XJT employees/family get vacation passes to up their priority?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

RoyerYetlink 05-04-2019 05:35 AM


Originally Posted by bestdamnpilot (Post 2814017)
Do XJT employees/family get vacation passes to up their priority?

No, Smisek took those away around 2011.

PeakEGT 06-10-2019 04:47 AM

Jumpseating
 
Haven’t really got a clear answer on this. If someone with experience can chime in. My parents live in South America and NK or JBU are the only carriers that fly direct. Are we allowed per contract/company policy to list as we would to jumpseat to an international destination? Thank you

flynd94 06-10-2019 04:57 AM


Originally Posted by PeakEGT (Post 2834590)
Haven’t really got a clear answer on this. If someone with experience can chime in. My parents live in South America and NK or JBU are the only carriers that fly direct. Are we allowed per contract/company policy to list as we would to jumpseat to an international destination? Thank you

.

You can only occupy a seat in the back. So yes you can jump seat but not on the flight deck.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:28 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands