![]() |
Upgrade Time By Base
This is the current upgrade time for the E-145 for each base on the last bid (19-04). The upgrades from the last bid (19-03) haven't gone to class and won't for the next 1-2 months. 19-04 has an effective date of April 2020.
Most junior Bid 19-04 upgrade : EWR: 2 yrs, 10 months CLE: 3 yrs, 6 months. ORD: 10 yrs, 2 months IAH: 12 yrs, 6 months TYS: No upgrades (extremely, extremely senior and tiny base) (6 Lines) Feel free to update this thread as upgrade time comes down. |
Originally Posted by FlyRight2876
(Post 2870431)
This is the current upgrade time for the E-145 for each base on the last bid (19-04). The upgrades from the last bid (19-03) haven't gone to class and won't for the next 1-2 months. 19-04 has an effective date of April 2020.
Most junior Bid 19-04 upgrade : EWR: 2 yrs, 10 months CLE: 3 yrs, 6 months. ORD: 10 yrs, 2 months IAH: 12 yrs, 6 months TYS: No upgrades (extremely, extremely senior and tiny base) (6 Lines) Feel free to update this thread as upgrade time comes down. Awesome the upgrade time has come down from 8 yrs to 2 yrs 10 months. That great news. |
Originally Posted by flynd94
(Post 2870451)
Awesome the upgrade time has come down from 8 yrs to 2 yrs 10 months. That great news.
|
These numbers are a little misleading though because you are only taking one bid into consideration. In 19-03, for example, the junior IAH CA award was 5 yr 2 mo. There just wasn't any spots in IAH to go around on this latest bid. I am sure future bids will have more slots in these senior bases and the junior ca hire dates will drop.
|
Originally Posted by flynd94
(Post 2870451)
Awesome the upgrade time has come down from 8 yrs to 2 yrs 10 months. That great news.
You are seriously a disappointment breeding machine. It’s not great news. One day it “will” be great news. A person will upgrade when they upgrade. Fantasizing about it will not pay the bills or earn you PIC time. Tell the truth and nothing but the truth. People of the future will thank you. |
Originally Posted by afterburn81
(Post 2870600)
You are seriously a disappointment breeding machine. It’s not great news. One day it “will” be great news.
A person will upgrade when they upgrade. Fantasizing about it will not pay the bills or earn you PIC time. Tell the truth and nothing but the truth. People of the future will thank you. I get what you’re saying.....but it wasn’t too long ago that EWR was at 8-9 years, and IAH was untouchable. So flynd94 is right, even if you wanna just focus on the negative. |
Originally Posted by PhantomHawk
(Post 2870602)
It’s like that at ALL airlines. Upgrade at UAL is about 4 years.......if you want SFO. Many people don’t, so they wait. Upgrade at IAH is about 7 years. Denver is insanely high. But nobody walks around talking about “average upgrade”. The garbage bases are junior, the desirable bases are senior. Always gonna be that way. If you want it bad enough......you’ll take it. I upgraded as soon as I could at XJT. I live in a hub, but I commuted to other bases for almost 3 years.
I get what you’re saying.....but it wasn’t too long ago that EWR was at 8-9 years, and IAH was untouchable. So flynd94 is right, even if you wanna just focus on the negative. That should be obvious when they say things like “it’s a lie to tell people the upgrade time is 2 years 10 months” when that’s exactly what the time is, right there in black and white! The way things are playing out with the Chicago base opening I see another system bid in the near future. Probably around October. The upgrade time will be under 2 years and there will REALLY be some panties in a wad. |
What are the junior hire dates for 175 CAs?
|
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2870777)
What are the junior hire dates for 175 CAs?
FO side has gone very junior, majority new hires. Basically the E175 FOs should expect to upgrade on the E145. That is unless the fleet sees MASSIVE changes in the next 2 years. |
Originally Posted by CubWrangler
(Post 2870790)
June 2000.
FO side has gone very junior, majority new hires. Basically the E175 FOs should expect to upgrade on the E145. That is unless the fleet sees MASSIVE changes in the next 2 years. |
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2870777)
What are the junior hire dates for 175 CAs?
|
Originally Posted by predhead
(Post 2870987)
19-04 Junior ER7 CA: 10/2006 hire
|
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2871062)
13-year upgrade on the 175? Ouch...
|
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2871089)
I’m here for the resume, not the glamor of being a 175 captain.
|
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2871062)
13-year upgrade on the 175? Ouch...
|
Originally Posted by PhantomHawk
(Post 2870602)
It’s like that at ALL airlines. Upgrade at UAL is about 4 years.......if you want SFO. Many people don’t, so they wait. Upgrade at IAH is about 7 years. Denver is insanely high. But nobody walks around talking about “average upgrade”. The garbage bases are junior, the desirable bases are senior. Always gonna be that way. If you want it bad enough......you’ll take it. I upgraded as soon as I could at XJT. I live in a hub, but I commuted to other bases for almost 3 years.
I get what you’re saying.....but it wasn’t too long ago that EWR was at 8-9 years, and IAH was untouchable. So flynd94 is right, even if you wanna just focus on the negative. If they upgrade a guy that was was 25% down the list, who the heck would be his FO? Another captain? The company would need to hire, train and RETAIN another 300 people overnight, to make it possible for an individual with 2.5 years seniority to become a captain right now. His FO isn’t even on property yet and they are announcing to the industry that his seniority could currently hold a captain position. So to clarify, I don’t know of any other airline that “forecasts” an award before they are actually even in a state where they could place the individual in the seat. This strategy is used to lure and recruit. When a company does nothing to retain or protect those on property, exposing their game is definitely reasonable. |
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2871089)
New hires should just plan on upgrading to the 145. Looks better to have 2 types when applying to the majors anyway. If things change within a couple of years and you end up with a 175 upgrade so be it, but to me that would be the less desirable option. I’m here for the resume, not the glamor of being a 175 captain.
|
IOW, management should be able to get pilots to work for a piece of paper.
|
Originally Posted by afterburn81
(Post 2871371)
I think you might have misinterpreted what I was saying. Upgrade is what upgrade is. Not what it is “going” to be. The company could not upgrade someone that was hired 2 and a half years ago, right now. Not because of a training back log. Not because of seniority. But because the numbers don’t work. Someone at 2.5 years with the company is at around 1050 out of 1392. Sure, there are a percentage of guys bypassing upgrade. Not many, but they’re there.
If they upgrade a guy that was was 25% down the list, who the heck would be his FO? Another captain? The company would need to hire, train and RETAIN another 300 people overnight, to make it possible for an individual with 2.5 years seniority to become a captain right now. His FO isn’t even on property yet and they are announcing to the industry that his seniority could currently hold a captain position. So to clarify, I don’t know of any other airline that “forecasts” an award before they are actually even in a state where they could place the individual in the seat. This strategy is used to lure and recruit. When a company does nothing to retain or protect those on property, exposing their game is definitely reasonable. |
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2871384)
Lol, wut????
When it’s sitting next to yours that says you bailed and made a lateral move guess who gets the job? |
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2871708)
You know, 2 type ratings, 1500 turbine PIC. Goes on a resume. You use it to apply for jobs.
When it’s sitting next to yours that says you bailed and made a lateral move guess who gets the job? |
Originally Posted by KCaviator
(Post 2871906)
Not quite sure what you’re referring to. I’ve only been at one regional. Your ~*^%~>TWO<~%^*~ type ratings is going to set you so far apart though!
|
Originally Posted by afterburn81
(Post 2870600)
You are seriously a disappointment breeding machine. It’s not great news. One day it “will” be great news.
A person will upgrade when they upgrade. Fantasizing about it will not pay the bills or earn you PIC time. Tell the truth and nothing but the truth. People of the future will thank you.
Originally Posted by PhantomHawk
(Post 2870602)
It’s like that at ALL airlines. Upgrade at UAL is about 4 years.......if you want SFO. Many people don’t, so they wait.
|
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2871089)
I’m here for the resume, not the glamor of being a 175 captain.
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2871708)
You know, 2 type ratings, 1500 turbine PIC. Goes on a resume. You use it to apply for jobs.
When it’s sitting next to yours that says you bailed and made a lateral move guess who gets the job? |
Originally Posted by ToddChavez
(Post 2871953)
Comparing XJT to UAL is delusion at its finest.
|
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2871915)
Wait, so you come on here and talk all that crap and you’ve never worked here? That’s kinda psycho
|
Originally Posted by ToddChavez
(Post 2871953)
No kidding! What a joke! Who would come to this airline with the better opportunities and better pay offered at literally every other regional airline?
Comparing XJT to UAL is delusion at its finest. Republic, SKW, TSA's most senior bases can be held as a CA much sooner... lol. |
Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
(Post 2872121)
United will reward XJT the next 39 new 175s because we are price competitive. Our ALPA union sold us out on the last contract so we can steal market share. More 175s will drop upgrade times to less than two years. That will drive new pilots to XJT. Whipsaw continues to work.
|
Bump. Subodh, AKA DoSomePilotStuff is selling more lies.
https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/e...ward-base.html Upgrade time is not based off base trades, but awards. Simple stuff. The guy can't help himself from lying though. |
Originally Posted by SureJetz
(Post 2879238)
Bump. Subodh, AKA DoSomePilotStuff is selling more lies.
https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/e...ward-base.html Upgrade time is not based off base trades, but awards. Simple stuff. The guy can't help himself from lying though. |
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2879258)
Again, there are nearly 100 CAs in IAH below the person you are referring to. For the purposes of total transparency is this not an important fact?
There's only 140 captains in IAH right now. Are you seriously trying to sell that a 4-14 hire is number 40 in base? A new low for you. |
Originally Posted by SureJetz
(Post 2879270)
You mean the one's listed on the bid pack at ULA? Those are pilots who have left silly. They list them as ULA until they're gone for 6 months and then remove them from the bid packet.
There's only 140 captains in IAH right now. Are you seriously trying to sell that a 4-14 hire is number 40 in base? A new low for you. |
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2879287)
Ok now you are educating me. Like I said I am a new hire. I’m just looking at the seniority list. There are over 300 CAs listed at IAH. So why do we list everyone who has left as a CA at IAH? Were they all CAs? Were they all based at IAH?
Watching the two of you argue is like CNN and Fox News. You’re both overly biased and pushing an agenda. |
Originally Posted by PhantomHawk
(Post 2879299)
It’s not just guys on EMP leave. It’s also MED leave, MGMT pilots, ALPA guys on trip loss, and Training Center guys. If you’re an instructor, you show as IAH-based even if you can’t hold it by seniority.
Watching the two of you argue is like CNN and Fox News. You’re both overly biased and pushing an agenda. So can we say that the Commuter Hotels and duty rigs have “bipartisan support?” LOL |
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2879300)
Thanks, so if a ORD CA leaves he is shown as an IAH CA? What about FOs?
So can we say that the Commuter Hotels and duty rigs have “bipartisan support?” LOL The only exception is the IAH FO list since it has new hires as well before they get their base assigned after training. |
Originally Posted by SureJetz
(Post 2879323)
It's broken down by base and seat position. ORD ULA/EMP leaves don't get put on the IAH list.
The only exception is the IAH FO list since it has new hires as well before they get their base assigned after training. How sure are you that all 100 were base transfers? Could it be they were awarded on a previous bid? |
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2879334)
So there are 283 145 IAH CAs on the list. If there are only 140 total IAH CAs, does that mean 140 of them have already left? And of the 100 on the list more Jr than a 2007 hire, all of them have left?
How sure are you that all 100 were base transfers? Could it be they were awarded on a previous bid? How is it that you're dolling out all this advice when you don't even know how the bid/seniority list and ULA works? |
Originally Posted by SureJetz
(Post 2879339)
We were talking about the 4/14 upgrade, now you're talking about a 2007 hire. Why do you keep changing the topic?
How is it that you're dolling out all this advice when you don't even know how the bid/seniority list and ULA works? |
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2879341)
There are 94 pilots on the list between the ‘07 hire you have been referring to and the 4/14 hire I have been referring to. I am asking you to explain that to me.
Dude. You gotta quit playing games. Everyone on this forum can see right through you. We were all new hires at one point. No one ever acted this way. What ever management crap you are tying to pull, it’s only making things worse. Awareness is catching up and the lies are getting harder to spread. If XJT is such a great place, what are you worried about? All those saying negative things are just complainers with nothing to back it up. Things will be juuuusst fine. So let it go. |
Originally Posted by DoSomePilotStuf
(Post 2879341)
There are 94 pilots on the list between the ‘07 hire you have been referring to and the 4/14 hire I have been referring to. I am asking you to explain that to me.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:00 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands