![]() |
Originally Posted by Meep
(Post 3101790)
Just showing the other side, but couldn’t United have already basically chosen C5 and the only option XJT has is to take concessions and try to match it?
Regardless crappy position for both airlines. |
Originally Posted by climb150
(Post 3101898)
This statement has so many holes in it I won't bother fully replying.
Check the C5 departures from IAD again. Then ask someone how United gave most of C5s flying to ZW for August because United scheduled C5 a ton of flying from EWR which NJ and NY governor pulled the pin last minute. I think it's you who don't know stuff. Good luck tomorrow. |
Originally Posted by itsmytime
(Post 3101916)
hate to burst your bubble, but c5 is done. If United was interested in c5, they would have asked for concessions from you also. Why not try to get whoever is left, as low as possible? Make it a cage match between both carriers, lowest bidder “wins.”
I'm sure that the size of the network EV has is appealing but there's no reason a mixture of OO/C5/ZW couldn't cover it. The same could be said of any of us really... |
|
Originally Posted by GA2Jets
(Post 3101925)
It seems pretty straightforward to me. UA says to Expressjet management: C5 can do for $5 what you do for $7. Do it for $5 or we will cut your contract.
I'm sure that the size of the network EV has is appealing but there's no reason a mixture of OO/C5/ZW couldn't cover it. The same could be said of any of us really... |
Originally Posted by GA2Jets
(Post 3101917)
What reason is there to think that any government official had anything to do with C5 flying at Newark?
If they say let United increase EWR flying they will. If they then say no we are worried about people bringing CoVID to EWR they will go back on what they say. |
Originally Posted by GA2Jets
(Post 3101917)
What reason is there to think that any government official had anything to do with C5 flying at Newark?
No one on here knows what will happen in the end, and the only thing that is factual at this point is C5 is the only carrier that has lost flying in their only base of operation going into August. Who knows what that means, but no doubt we will find out eventually, at first glance I wouldn’t say it’s good for C5 though. |
Originally Posted by climb150
(Post 3101930)
Because the Port Authority of NJ and NY has to do what the governors of NY and NJ tell them to do.
If they say let United increase EWR flying they will. If they then say no we are worried about people bringing CoVID to EWR they will go back on what they say. |
Originally Posted by itsmytime
(Post 3101929)
but the name of the game now is supposedly cost cutting, correct? Why not try to get c5 down to $4 or $3. United is bleeding cash, there is no way Kirby would pass over an opportunity to bend over a pilot group.
|
Originally Posted by WtsPltsGts
(Post 3101884)
you are literally the dumbest person to post on this forum and that’s saying a lot. ExpressJet was growing Pre-Covid and C5 took the old XR’s to open 175’s for XJT, when they left, XJT was given a DEN base and more block hours, C5 wasn’t. Even now the August schedule is increasing for XJT and C5 flying has now been reduced by 10 daily departures as ZW moves back into IAD which is the ONLY base C5 operates out of. There has been an addition to XJT flying, not a reduction. Lol you are dumber than sh**... anything can happen but you don’t know anything about this business.
|
Republic pulling out of IAH is telling
|
Originally Posted by itsmytime
(Post 3101916)
hate to burst your bubble, but c5 is done. If United was interested in c5, they would have asked for concessions from you also. Why not try to get whoever is left, as low as possible? Make it a cage match between both carriers, lowest bidder “wins.”
|
Originally Posted by McGpilot
(Post 3101959)
C5 lost flying in IAD due to the fact they were supposed to pick up 3,000 block hours in EWR before the NY/NJ goverment created mass travel bans. Which would of been enough to keep everyone in jobs come October 1st. When the EWR flying went away we didn't get our 500ish hours back from ZW. I wouldn't be so quick to speak of what you don't know.
|
Originally Posted by McGpilot
(Post 3101959)
C5 lost flying in IAD due to the fact they were supposed to pick up 3,000 block hours in EWR before the NY/NJ goverment created mass travel bans. Which would of been enough to keep everyone in jobs come October 1st. When the EWR flying went away we didn't get our 500ish hours back from ZW. I wouldn't be so quick to speak of what you don't know.
|
Originally Posted by WtsPltsGts
(Post 3101938)
absolutely ZERO, some C5 guy is over on their forum peddling conspiracy theories and pretending he is a “somebody” who knew “someone” who was “important”- lol it’s a joke.
They originally gave C5 8000 block in EWR for August and gave a couple hundred hours of our flying in IAD to AW that made sense given their typical route structure. Then at the last minute Cuomo and Murphy got together and over-reacted to the recent spike in cases in the south and declared "no turn up in EWR". The port authority of NY and NJ (note those states are in the name of the organization) pulled the plug and UAL was forced to delay reopening of EWR. At this point it was too late to change what they gave AW so C5 got what it had in July minus about 200 hours, so we now sit at 2500 hrs for August. This is consistent with a couple captains I know who barely had a line in July losing their lines for August. Care to make any more uninformed statements? |
Originally Posted by njd1
(Post 3102017)
I'm the guy who said that and that statement came directly from a union official (though I won't say who since I don't want to get him in any trouble). It is no conspiracy theory. This guy sees the data file UAL gives our company and works with other union members to build our schedules every month so he would know the truth. I've also flown with the guy and, like me, he is not someone who gets his jollies running around telling lies.
They originally gave C5 8000 block in EWR for August, gave AW some additional flying in IAD to pick up what made sense given their typical route structure. Then at the last minute Cuomo and Murphy got together and over-reacted to the recent spike in cases in the south and said "no turn up in EWR". The port authority of NY and NJ (note those states are in the name of the organization) pulled the plug and UAL was forced to delay reopening of EWR. At this point it was too late to change what they gave AW so C5 got what it had in July minus about 200 hours, so we now sit at 2500 hrs for August. This consistent with a couple captains I know who barely had a line in July losing their lines for August. Care to make any more uninformed statements? I get it. Everyone is hurting and it’s a lot more palatable to blame Cuomo than a force of nature or big picture economics. |
Originally Posted by njd1
(Post 3102017)
I'm the guy who said that and that statement came directly from a union official (though I won't say who since I don't want to get him in any trouble). It is no conspiracy theory. This guy sees the data file UAL gives our company and works with other union members to build our schedules every month so he would know the truth. I've also flown with the guy and, like me, he is not someone who gets his jollies running around telling lies.
They originally gave C5 8000 block in EWR for August and gave a couple hundred hours of our flying in IAD to AW that made sense given their typical route structure. Then at the last minute Cuomo and Murphy got together and over-reacted to the recent spike in cases in the south and declared "no turn up in EWR". The port authority of NY and NJ (note those states are in the name of the organization) pulled the plug and UAL was forced to delay reopening of EWR. At this point it was too late to change what they gave AW so C5 got what it had in July minus about 200 hours, so we now sit at 2500 hrs for August. This is consistent with a couple captains I know who barely had a line in July losing their lines for August. Care to make any more uninformed statements? |
Originally Posted by GA2Jets
(Post 3102020)
I just really want an answer to the question, how do you know you had 8000 hours? That's a huge increase and it's odd that it's not been brought up til yesterday.
Why do you guys care anyway? It's not exactly news that pre-covid C5 was taking over flying in EWR from you guys while you were moving out to ORD. It makes perfect sense to me that UAL was expecting C5 to do a bulk of the E145 lift out of EWR during the recovery. And for the record, 8000 block is less than 70% of the flying we were doing this time last year so it's not exactly a gift. Even with that many hours we'd have to furlough some people come October 1. |
Originally Posted by njd1
(Post 3102030)
I know because a guy I trust said he saw that in the original (now pulled) data file straight from UAL. Is it really that hard to believe?
Why do you guys care anyway? It's not exactly news that pre-covid C5 was taking over flying in EWR from you guys while you were moving out to ORD. It makes perfect sense to me that UAL was expecting C5 to do a bulk of the E145 lift out of EWR during the recovery. And for the record, 8000 block is less than 70% of the flying we were doing this time last year so it's not exactly a gift. Even with that many hours we'd have to furlough some people come October 1. |
Originally Posted by njd1
(Post 3102030)
I know because a guy I trust said he saw that in the original (now pulled) data file straight from UAL. Is it really that hard to believe?
Why do you guys care anyway? It's not exactly news that pre-covid C5 was taking over flying in EWR from you guys while you were moving out to ORD. It makes perfect sense to me that UAL was expecting C5 to do a bulk of the E145 lift out of EWR during the recovery. And for the record, 8000 block is less than 70% of the flying we were doing this time last year so it's not exactly a gift. Even with that many hours we'd have to furlough some people come October 1. |
It's official. ExpressJet is done
"ExpressJetters, As you may be aware, United made a strategic decision to retain only one ERJ145 United Express operator for 2021 and beyond. Unfortunately, we have just been told that United intends to go forward with CommutAir as its sole operator of the ERJ145 in 2021. SK " |
Pleasure flying with along side some great people and for green pastures on the other side of this.
|
Originally Posted by furloughfuntime
(Post 3102041)
It's official. ExpressJet is done
"ExpressJetters, As you may be aware, United made a strategic decision to retain only one ERJ145 United Express operator for 2021 and beyond. Unfortunately, we have just been told that United intends to go forward with CommutAir as its sole operator of the ERJ145 in 2021. SK " |
I've been gone from Xjet since last year and am looking at my own possible furlough. But I will say thank you to all the pilots and FAs who made coming to work not feel like work. A truly excellent training program, operation, and group of people.
|
Originally Posted by WtsPltsGts
(Post 3102036)
Everything you say is a absurd, not to mention you didn't get the Fake block hours you're talking about in the end so it's irrelevant. Secondly, the "travel ban" /quarantine requirement was implemented on June 24th for EWR. We have been given block hours far exceeding the IAD block hours in question only days in advance and you want to believe a fairytale that United couldn't give you the flying back in IAD with almost 5 weeks of lead time? haha this is getting more ridiculous by the minute.
Listen, I only responded to the thread because someone was calling me out for lying and I wanted to set the record straight over here. But like the other poster said, it's all water under the bridge at this point since we didn't get the hours. |
Well, I enjoyed my time at XJT while it lasted....
ExpressJetters, As you may be aware, United made a strategic decision to retain only one ERJ145 United Express operator for 2021 and beyond. Unfortunately, we have just been told that United intends to go forward with CommutAir as its sole operator of the ERJ145 in 2021. This is devastating news for all of us. ExpressJet’s capability and flexibility have always been unchallenged. Although we presented a solid business plan, with very attractive costs, to United, unfortunately, we did not make the cut. It is disappointing to all that ExpressJet’s many strengths – including our ability to maintain and fly hundreds of aircraft - were insufficient to secure the win in an era of industry uncertainty and caution. In the coming days, we will work with United to develop a workplan for the phased wind-down of our operations. The transition will take a number of months, and we’ll be sure to provide updates along the way. That workplan will include the timeline, information relating to specific work groups, and details regarding your pay and benefits. As soon as that information becomes available, we will share it with you. In the meanwhile, I ask that you continue to display your exemplary professionalism and perform at your regular high level. Please continue to hold your best-in-the-business head high and contribute as we go through this difficult transition. And most importantly, please stay healthy and safe. Best Regards, Subodh |
This was the place to be in the mid 2000’s. Sorry to any of y’all that are without a job soon. This too will pass eventually.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
I am so sorry for you guys!!!! 😢
|
Well like I’ve been saying all along, we’re toast. Bon voyage. It’s been fun! Had a good run.
|
Can anyone explain why APC has two different FO pay scales for CommutAir? The “ALL” scale shows $54 year 2 pay, but the “E145” scale shows $39 year 2 pay.
Hopefully we all get some sort of preferential interview. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
It’s so devastating to hear this. I hope the best for all you guys. I always thought your own-branded flying and livery back in 2007 was so *****in’.
|
Originally Posted by MooseAg03
(Post 3102064)
Can anyone explain why APC has two different FO pay scales for CommutAir? The “ALL” scale shows $54 year 2 pay, but the “E145” scale shows $39 year 2 pay.
Hopefully we all get some sort of preferential interview. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk There is an LOA that gave Dash Captain pay to second year FOs to encourage retention. It expires at the end of the month. The 39 will be the rate going forward. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by WtsPltsGts
(Post 3102026)
ohhh ya you’re the CLOWN... welcome.. here is a fact- NO ONE cares about who you know or who you say you talked to. Prove it or shut up because no one takes you seriously. I have half a dozen people I know who know people at United that have specifically stated that’s a delusional rumor filtering around C5.... Again, no one cares or believes who you think you know and what they think they know.
|
Wow. It’s over.
I am one of the new ones to XJT but I never regretted coming on over. Whereas other places I interviewed laughed at my B1900 time, XJT was great as many of the guys had B1900 experience back in the day. Nuts. Soft landings everyone. Good luck out there. |
I am sorry, I have no words. This sucks all around, and no one should feel good about it either way.
Shalom |
Originally Posted by climb150
(Post 3102068)
Well it turns out he wasn't making stuff up
|
Sorry to hear the news.
Many friends over in XJT over the years. Will be sad to see you go, Acey. |
Hope you all land on your feet. XJT has always been an admirable group of people.
|
Sorry to hear this. Great group at Acey. Tailwinds.
|
XJT 145 alum. 2012-2015
hate this. Acey was my first foray into the airline world. Had some truly great and unforgettable times. Here’s hoping you guys get sucked up quickly or can secure some preference. Thousands of pilots now on the street. Word is that us NK guys will be soon as well. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:39 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands