Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

ExpressJet Flies West

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2020 | 01:00 PM
  #361  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flightlessbirds
That is a OO problem not a -200 problem in most cases. Witness how often a ZW -200 is weight restricted for an ACM.
It’s very rare at ZW that we can’t take a jumpseater. We make it work. We won’t leave someone behind if we can help it. Nothing is fudged either. The extra 100lbs of permanent ballast helps, along with no carry ons.
Reply
Old 09-08-2020 | 03:34 PM
  #362  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
Gotta play smart. I’ve never left someone behind, and never “fudged” anything. Might mean a different alternate and more ballast, but it can be done.
Different Alternate ?Now you’re getting dispatch involved . Wrong decision when you’re playing with numbers
Reply
Old 09-08-2020 | 04:57 PM
  #363  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by idlethrust
Different Alternate ?Now you’re getting dispatch involved . Wrong decision when you’re playing with numbers
I don’t “play” with numbers. If you need it you need it. If you don’t want dispatch to know what you’re doing you probably shouldn’t be doing it.
Reply
Old 09-08-2020 | 07:16 PM
  #364  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,580
Likes: 237
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by flightlessbirds
That is a OO problem not a -200 problem in most cases. Witness how often a ZW -200 is weight restricted for an ACM.
it’s a W&B program problem.
-OO allows carry on bags
-does not add extra ballast to the tailcone
-until recently allowed crew to store their bags throughout the cabin (including the closet in the cockpit) instead of over the back rows like AWAC (or so I’m told)
that last one changed last year but the other two still hurt the W&B situation. I’ve had to leave an LCA behind on a line check but OO just didn’t want to pay for that tail weight.
Reply
Old 09-08-2020 | 08:05 PM
  #365  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Claxstarr
This is why I said the other post was dumb.
The statements over simplified for anyone that started post 2013.

INC tried to make the XJT side more profitable.
The proposed way to do it was to have the XJT guys vote out their union which would allow a merge of the seniority lists by DOH.

The reasoning was because,
1) by the XJT contracts, the XJT pilots were too expensive for the aircraft that were being flown
2)you can’t merge a union and non-union seniority list

Let’s not forget that CC was not the CEO when the buy happened. He knew it wouldn’t work financially for either company, but when he took over it was his job make things happen.

Of course that was voted down bc there was no way XJT was going to vote out a union and take a $10/hr pay cut just to get a seniority list merge.

SO after all of that fell through and COVID happened,
UA bought XJT at their( still) high pay rates and let subohd drive them into the ground after promised contract negotiations.
That 10k per year that the senior CA’s made from 2013-2020 (70k over 7 years) will be lost in 7-8 months of not being employed now that UA shut XJT down.

It’s a huge bummer. I understand and empathize with both sides of that table.
Maybe hindsight was 20/20?
Would the XJT guys have been better off in 2020 being merged with OO which would have created a 7000 pilot “super regional”?
I don’t know, maybe, maybe not.

What we do know now is that any of these guys will be starting over at the bottom of the list at commutair, if they even open hiring up.

We also know that getting ****ed off at other pilots isn’t going to solve a damn thing.
The whole situation blows.
I wish everyone could just give it a rest.
Where did you read this fairy tale. There never was any talk of dumping alpa, much less a vote.
Reply
Old 09-08-2020 | 08:12 PM
  #366  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Fdelanore
like I said before , the only reason you guys survived this long is because of the “Utah Mafia” so perhaps be thankful you actually had a job, because if it wasn’t for the Utah Mafia, you’d been belly up 10 years ago.

Lets discuss your second point. One could argue that express jet pilots have a reputation of being extremely whiney and having this idea that everything should be given to them. They also seem to blame everyone else for their trouble. As this page has proven
Obviously not all xjet pilots are like this, but this page seems to bring out the worse of them.
more fairly tales. Continental wanted a new cpa after 5 years of a 10 year deal. Xjt said no.
Cal colluded with inc. to take-over xjt and pays inc $ 6 million for the effort. 3 years later with Inc's help, xjt is slowly losing money and our new ceo and bod finally give in and sell. The entire thing was a setup by cal and inc.
If inc didn't collude with cal to attempt the takeover, xjt would have remained profitable.
Reply
Old 09-08-2020 | 10:29 PM
  #367  
Turbosina's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,635
Likes: 583
From: Guppy Gear Slinger
Default

I recite the FO creed from memory as part of the originating check. Is that wrong?
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 05:18 AM
  #368  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Redheadtexas
more fairly tales. Continental wanted a new cpa after 5 years of a 10 year deal. Xjt said no.
Cal colluded with inc. to take-over xjt and pays inc $ 6 million for the effort. 3 years later with Inc's help, xjt is slowly losing money and our new ceo and bod finally give in and sell. The entire thing was a setup by cal and inc.
If inc didn't collude with cal to attempt the takeover, xjt would have remained profitable.
Thank you Red. These noobs who don't know history eventually learn what happened. If he/she would do a little more reading/searching they would find the numerous posts I've made, as wells as the posts of others on this topic. What happened to XJT was not the pilots fault, nor that of their excellent contract (for a regional). Blame lies squarely with the Skywest execs in charge at the time (Jerry Atkin, etc.). They created the money losing cpa that XJT got stuck with after their failed attempt to buy us in 2008 (at which point they went home with their 6 million dollar consolation prize from CAL). OK, now I'm tired of explaining this. New guys just don't care how we got here. Their culture won't let them see the truth.
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 05:23 AM
  #369  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Southern Fried
Thank you Red. These noobs who don't know history eventually learn what happened. If he/she would do a little more reading/searching they would find the numerous posts I've made, as wells as the posts of others on this topic. What happened to XJT was not the pilots fault, nor that of their excellent contract (for a regional). Blame lies squarely with the Skywest execs in charge at the time (Jerry Atkin, etc.). They created the money losing cpa that XJT got stuck with after their failed attempt to buy us in 2008 (at which point they went home with their 6 million dollar consolation prize from CAL). OK, now I'm tired of explaining this. New guys just don't care how we got here. Their culture won't let them see the truth.
No no no. That's not the real story! It's because the Xjt pilots wouldn't vote out ALPA and agree to paycuts to a contract signed all the way back in 2004. I mean people actually believe that and blame the Xjt pilots for what happened! Some people in this industry are so clueless and are our own worst enemies.
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 06:46 AM
  #370  
Claxstarr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Southern Fried
Thank you Red. These noobs who don't know history eventually learn what happened. If he/she would do a little more reading/searching they would find the numerous posts I've made, as wells as the posts of others on this topic. What happened to XJT was not the pilots fault, nor that of their excellent contract (for a regional). Blame lies squarely with the Skywest execs in charge at the time (Jerry Atkin, etc.). They created the money losing cpa that XJT got stuck with after their failed attempt to buy us in 2008 (at which point they went home with their 6 million dollar consolation prize from CAL). OK, now I'm tired of explaining this. New guys just don't care how we got here. Their culture won't let them see the truth.

This is (mostly) correct for what happened pre-buyout! My post was on post-buyout which is an important distinction.

It takes 15 seconds to google what happened between continental/XJT/OO in 2008.
That XJT contract was excellent.... for XJT.
Continental was unhappy with the XJT contract and was going to remove 51 XJT planes from operation.
Enter the 2008 SkyWest deal.
SkyWest would get the contract to fly continental routes IF, and only if, they bought XJT.
They bid $3.50/share when the valuation was $2.00/share at the time, which XJT turned down.
Eventually after XJT bleeds for long enough, SkyWest succeeded in buying XJT.

It’s basically the same story in 2010..
XJT costs are more expensive than their competitor (SkyWest) and then Continental in 2008/2010 wants to take flying away.
XJT costs are more expensive than their competitor (CommutAir) and then United 2020 takes all their flying away.

Also, how did OO force a money losing contract at
XJT in 2008?
I would imagine ALPA would have shut down a contract negotiated by the non-union devils at OO.....
Or maybe that was actually Continental’s fault?
/sarcasm.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
R57 relay
American
222
01-17-2014 02:17 PM
Boneman
ExpressJet
16
12-10-2009 09:04 PM
Past V1
Regional
64
04-28-2008 03:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices