Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

ExpressJet Flies West

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2020 | 07:38 AM
  #371  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Claxstarr
This is (mostly) correct for what happened pre-buyout! My post was on post-buyout which is an important distinction.

It takes 15 seconds to google what happened between continental/XJT/OO in 2008.
That XJT contract was excellent.... for XJT.
Continental was unhappy with the XJT contract and was going to remove 51 XJT planes from operation.
Enter the 2008 SkyWest deal.
SkyWest would get the contract to fly continental routes IF, and only if, they bought XJT.
They bid $3.50/share when the valuation was $2.00/share at the time, which XJT turned down.
Eventually after XJT bleeds for long enough, SkyWest succeeded in buying XJT.

It’s basically the same story in 2010..
XJT costs are more expensive than their competitor (SkyWest) and then Continental in 2008/2010 wants to take flying away.
XJT costs are more expensive than their competitor (CommutAir) and then United 2020 takes all their flying away.

Also, how did OO force a money losing contract at
XJT in 2008?
I would imagine ALPA would have shut down a contract negotiated by the non-union devils at OO.....
Or maybe that was actually Continental’s fault?
/sarcasm.
I agree your post. What I don’t agree with is the spin Skywest Inc puts on it. And also the fact that people like Fdelenore eat it up like it’s gospel without doing further research. It’s hindsight now. But to blame the pilot group and tell them that the should appreciate the extra years is beyond ridiculous
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 07:45 AM
  #372  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
Default

Not to mention the terrible CPAs eXJT signed when they were there own company haunted OO for a decade as after inc spent money to buy eXJT they had to float them money every quarter to stay alive to fulfill the CPA. The salt in the wound to inc was after the money losing contracts were up for renewal United balked at the price tag to make eXJT a viable carrier. United owned the planes and sent them to TSA and awarded C5 a second life as a jet operator.
Inc regrets buying eXJT more than eXJT hates inc because they failed at due diligence.
...if we are talking history
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 07:53 AM
  #373  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,302
Likes: 2
Default

OO didn't do there “due diligence”. And bid CPA rates as if OO was flying it. Only to realize that they couldn’t get XJT cost down to what OO thought they could.. the guy in charge was let go for the mistake, and they were never able to recover the loss... They started to shed the operation down to just the UA side. But still couldn't make it work..
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 08:20 AM
  #374  
Claxstarr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Default ExpressJet Flies West

Just to add, OO did the deal with the understanding that it would be the SOLE Continental express carrier after the deal.
Little did we know, Continental and UA were already in talks and by the time the 2010 deal was done, Continental was a thing of the past.... and so was OO being the sole operator.

Also, is XJT is mad at anyone, it should be Mesa.
In 2016 Mesa came to IAH and undercut everyone.
That took XJT from 200 to 100 jets, 50% loss.
That also to OO from 100+ lines to 20 lines, an 80% loss,

That really started the XJT decline in my opinion.
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 04:53 PM
  #375  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flightlessbirds
That is a OO problem not a -200 problem in most cases. Witness how often a ZW -200 is weight restricted for an ACM.
I was about to say this, Only time I have seen it is out of COS on a summer day. I’m sure there are other times when runway conditions, DA or weather limit the actual Takeoff weight but not an actual weight and BALANCE issue. At Skywest they always seem to have a balance issue. It’s almost like they are too lazy to collect more bags to put in the back.
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 05:35 PM
  #376  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tonsterboy5
I was about to say this, Only time I have seen it is out of COS on a summer day. I’m sure there are other times when runway conditions, DA or weather limit the actual Takeoff weight but not an actual weight and BALANCE issue. At Skywest they always seem to have a balance issue. It’s almost like they are too lazy to collect more bags to put in the back.
Sir do you even roll the deuce?
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 05:40 PM
  #377  
RJSCUM's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Banana Stand
Default

Originally Posted by tonsterboy5
I was about to say this, Only time I have seen it is out of COS on a summer day. I’m sure there are other times when runway conditions, DA or weather limit the actual Takeoff weight but not an actual weight and BALANCE issue. At Skywest they always seem to have a balance issue. It’s almost like they are too lazy to collect more bags to put in the back.
It’s a 200, 90% of the carry on bags are automatically gate checked and loaded in the back and even then, most of the time it’s a weight issue where we need to take bags out of the cargo bin and bring them inside. I don’t know why the narrative on here is that OO -200s can never take a jumpseater. In the 6+ years I flew it I was only unable to take maybe 2 jumpseaters.
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 05:52 PM
  #378  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 103
From: Whale FO
Default

Originally Posted by tonsterboy5
I was about to say this, Only time I have seen it is out of COS on a summer day. I’m sure there are other times when runway conditions, DA or weather limit the actual Takeoff weight but not an actual weight and BALANCE issue. At Skywest they always seem to have a balance issue. It’s almost like they are too lazy to collect more bags to put in the back.
Whats the deal with COS? Its a 13500ft runway. Even though it is at 6200ft, surely you can't be runway limited there even on the hottest days?
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 06:10 PM
  #379  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dera
Whats the deal with COS? Its a 13500ft runway. Even though it is at 6200ft, surely you can't be runway limited there even on the hottest days?
Rising terrain if they’re departing to the south. I think the runway also has a not insignificant uphill slope going that direction as well. Winds often too strong to takeoff the other direction with a tailwind.
Reply
Old 09-09-2020 | 06:38 PM
  #380  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,580
Likes: 237
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by tonsterboy5
I was about to say this, Only time I have seen it is out of COS on a summer day. I’m sure there are other times when runway conditions, DA or weather limit the actual Takeoff weight but not an actual weight and BALANCE issue. At Skywest they always seem to have a balance issue. It’s almost like they are too lazy to collect more bags to put in the back.
it is a balance/MLW issue. With 50 pax and an alternate dispatch usually planned us to land around 46.7k. If I am remembering right A normal ballast number with 50pax and an ACM was 1800-2000lbs in the cargo compartment which usually translated to 600 lbs of ballast. Sometimes that just didn’t work with MLW.
Only had to say no a few times, although one time it was to an LCA doing a line check. Never left anyone behind if we didn’t have an alternate
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
R57 relay
American
222
01-17-2014 02:17 PM
Boneman
ExpressJet
16
12-10-2009 09:04 PM
Past V1
Regional
64
04-28-2008 03:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices