Search
Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

ExpressJet Flies West

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2020, 07:35 PM
  #411  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,949
Default

Originally Posted by climb150 View Post
They are refusing to give the code because apparently 'flight ops' need to authorize it and they aren't talking.
I wonder if a well placed letter from an outside attorney he would hire would get things unstuck. I know, lot of better ideas.
TransWorld is offline  
Old 09-15-2020, 02:51 AM
  #412  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: lav dumper
Posts: 707
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld View Post
I wonder if a well placed letter from an outside attorney he would hire would get things unstuck. I know, lot of better ideas.
The only place for the surface is in the garbage can.
DirkDiggler is offline  
Old 09-15-2020, 10:09 AM
  #413  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 360
Default

Originally Posted by Claxstarr View Post


Maybe hindsight was 20/20?
Would the XJT guys have been better off in 2020 being merged with OO which would have created a 7000 pilot “super regional”?
I don’t know, maybe, maybe not
Or may be the SKYW guys grow a pair and pay union dues like the balance of the industry
Jefferson is offline  
Old 09-15-2020, 01:10 PM
  #414  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
Default ExpressJet Flies West

Originally Posted by captive apple View Post
Not to mention the terrible CPAs eXJT signed when they were there own company haunted OO for a decade as after inc spent money to buy eXJT they had to float them money every quarter to stay alive to fulfill the CPA. The salt in the wound to inc was after the money losing contracts were up for renewal United balked at the price tag to make eXJT a viable carrier. United owned the planes and sent them to TSA and awarded C5 a second life as a jet operator.

Inc regrets buying eXJT more than eXJT hates inc because they failed at due diligence.

...if we are talking history

That terrible CPA with CAL that XJT signed in 2008 was a direct consequence of Skywest undercutting the bid for that flying as part of the first attempt to buy XJT. That XJT CPA was literally the one Skywest negotiated with CAL. So there is only one place to put that blame...if we are talking REAL history.

Originally Posted by amcnd View Post
OO didn't do there “due diligence”. And bid CPA rates as if OO was flying it. Only to realize that they couldn’t get XJT cost down to what OO thought they could.. the guy in charge was let go for the mistake, and they were never able to recover the loss... They started to shed the operation down to just the UA side. But still couldn't make it work..

Thats correct. Skywest wanted XJT pilots to take a 16% concession to bring them to parity to Skywest pilots’ pay. XJT MEC said they would only negotiate contract terms as part of a joint collective bargaining agreement. Of course Skywest had no desire in giving their pilots the ability to negotiate under the RLA.

Originally Posted by Fdelanore View Post
right...here I am....defending my fellow pilots and a company that has been very good to me and done it’s best to not furlough a single pilot standing up to the a group that’s constantly bashing them. Yep I’m the bad guy...
Just so that it’s clear, your company was being very good to you at a time that it wasn’t being very good to it’s thousands of other employees that didn’t fit under the right Inc name. So I hope you can understand the animosity.

Originally Posted by Fdelanore View Post
I just can’t understand how express jet pilots still think that any line pilot at Skywest brought about their demise. Do you really think INC bought a company and didn’t try to make it profitable? Does that sound like a smart business decision? Just how gullible are you?
No Skywest pilot brought about this demise. But let’s be honest, if Skywest would’ve merged the three airlines, this whole thing would look different. And Skywest pilots being non-union, having voted down union on three separate occasions, was the only reason keeping that from happening. As for smart business decisions, it didn’t work out exactly like they envisioned it but it certainly worked out pretty good in the long run. Or maybe it did work out exactly like they envisioned it?


Originally Posted by Fdelanore View Post
like I said before , the only reason you guys survived this long is because of the “Utah Mafia” so perhaps be thankful you actually had a job, because if it wasn’t for the Utah Mafia, you’d been belly up 10 years ago.
Again, the reason why XJT was in dire straits in 2010 was because of Skywest underbid in 2008. So you can’t take credit for fixing something (temporarily) for something you broke to begin with.



Originally Posted by Claxstarr View Post
INC tried to make the XJT side more profitable.
The proposed way to do it was to have the XJT guys vote out their union which would allow a merge of the seniority lists by DOH.

The reasoning was because,
1) by the XJT contracts, the XJT pilots were too expensive for the aircraft that were being flown
2)you can’t merge a union and non-union seniority list

Let’s not forget that CC was not the CEO when the buy happened. He knew it wouldn’t work financially for either company, but when he took over it was his job make things happen.

Of course that was voted down bc there was no way XJT was going to vote out a union and take a $10/hr pay cut just to get a seniority list merge.

SO after all of that fell through and COVID happened,
UA bought XJT at their( still) high pay rates and let subohd drive them into the ground after promised contract negotiations.
That 10k per year that the senior CA’s made from 2013-2020 (70k over 7 years) will be lost in 7-8 months of not being employed now that UA shut XJT down.

It’s a huge bummer. I understand and empathize with both sides of that table.
Maybe hindsight was 20/20?
Would the XJT guys have been better off in 2020 being merged with OO which would have created a 7000 pilot “super regional”?
I don’t know, maybe, maybe not.
Originally Posted by Claxstarr View Post
This is (mostly) correct for what happened pre-buyout! My post was on post-buyout which is an important distinction.

It takes 15 seconds to google what happened between continental/XJT/OO in 2008.
That XJT contract was excellent.... for XJT.
Continental was unhappy with the XJT contract and was going to remove 51 XJT planes from operation.
Enter the 2008 SkyWest deal.
SkyWest would get the contract to fly continental routes IF, and only if, they bought XJT.
They bid $3.50/share when the valuation was $2.00/share at the time, which XJT turned down.
Eventually after XJT bleeds for long enough, SkyWest succeeded in buying XJT.

It’s basically the same story in 2010..
XJT costs are more expensive than their competitor (SkyWest) and then Continental in 2008/2010 wants to take flying away.
XJT costs are more expensive than their competitor (CommutAir) and then United 2020 takes all their flying away.

Also, how did OO force a money losing contract at
XJT in 2008?
I would imagine ALPA would have shut down a contract negotiated by the non-union devils at OO.....
Or maybe that was actually Continental’s fault?
/sarcasm.
History review: CAL bought four regionals in the 90s and merged them into COEX. They were a wholly owned subsidiary of CAL with an actual flow through. Later, they decided to IPO XJT in order to raise almost half a billion at $16/share. So CAL themselves wrote the CPA that would exist for the new independent company that would become XJT. In order to inflate the initial IPO share price, they wrote a CPA that was favorable. But along with that favorable rate came many restrictions on the CPA (most favored nation, hub restrictions, asset, infrastructure, and manpower restrictions, options restrictions, sublease rate escalations, aircraft reductions and termination clauses, etc). But the one that ended up irking CAL the most is the yearly renegotiations with arbitration. That’s because, of course XJT wasn’t going to just give away favorable terms now as an independent company with fiduciary to their stockholders. Each year, CAL would ask for big concessions. So each year, it would go to an arbitrator to decide. In 2006, after CAL losing round after round of arbitrations, they wanted to change the negotiating landscape.

This is when, before starting the next round in the negotiating/arbitration cycle, CAL threatened to pull 25% of the fleet from the CPA. This is where the 69 aircraft come from, (25% of 274 aircraft). CAL got CHQ to negotiate a CPA for those aircraft. But XJT had the first right of refusal on the 69 aircraft and the BOD authorized to keep them to start their own branded airline.

Branded started in April 2007 and ended in September 2008. Bad timing with oil ramped up the entire time, hitting at peak of almost $150/barrel on that last month of operation. The Branded flying included a charter division and then later flying for Delta Connection, with short stints with jetblue, frontier, and Midwest.

This is when skywest enters the picture, in early 2008. Again, CAL looking to change the negotiating environment, they now paid Skywest more than $6 million for due diligence into buying XJT and negotiating a new CPA. Once Skywest negotiated a new CPA and decided what they require from XJT in order to consummate the purchase, CAL tells XJT that if they don’t provide a CPA that had savings on the magnitude of the those negotiated by Skywest, they would immediately pull another 25% (51 aircraft this time) and give their one year notice of complete spool down of the remaining aircraft.

Just for more context, the original deal that Skywest made with CAL included a seperare CPA for Skywest to operate some of the EMB145s under their own certificate with their own pilots. They were currently working to certify the 145 under their ops specs. It also included a furlough of 700 pilots (twice as many as ultimately were furloughed), and a preferential interview to the furloughed pilots to fly the previously XJT operated 145s as a first year FO and obviously losing ALPA representation.

One of Skywest’s other demands was the removal of the pilots’ contract language requiring a complete three airline merger (ASA,XJT,SKW) and 16% concessions to bring down pilot costs into parity with Skywest. Contrary to popular belief, you can merge union and on-union airlines. Just look at DAL/NWA. Same thing that happened there would’ve happened here. In that case, all employee groups, except for the two pilot groups who were already union, voted out union representation. We pointed this out Skywest as well. Didn’t matter. The XJT MEC negotiated with Skywest but were unable to come to an agreement. It is true that one pass across the table from Skywest was to decertify but that was immediately turned down with a counter proposal that would have kept three separate airlines, with three separate contracts (work rules for Skywest), three separate seniority list and one merged list used solely for aircraft bidding. Obviously that never happened. The reason given was because Skywest pilots had recently (a couple years earlier) turned down a union vote and management didn’t want to go against that...conveniently, I may add.

Anyway, once the negotiations between the MEC and Skywest fell through, the entire deal fell through because Skywest wouldn’t budge on the contract concessions. The XJT BOD was then left with the decision of letting CAL wind down XJT or XJT signing the very same CPA that Skywest had negotiate in their due diligence. Of course that CPA had the 16% concessions built into it so it was immediately money losing.

So now instead of having a profitable CPA with CAL and a money losing operation in branded and charter, they now had two money losing operations with the need to place 69 aircraft somewhere. This is where the UAL CPA flying comes in. And later an imminent deal with USAir that Skywest ended up taking for themselves in the 2010 purchase of XJT.

So in the end, Skywest ends up buying XJT, which was operating under the same money losing CPA they negotiated. The unprofitability of XJT was directly attributable to Skywest’s actions.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...jt8k061108.htm

Originally Posted by Claxstarr View Post
Just to add, OO did the deal with the understanding that it would be the SOLE Continental express carrier after the deal.
Little did we know, Continental and UA were already in talks and by the time the 2010 deal was done, Continental was a thing of the past.... and so was OO being the sole operator.

Also, is XJT is mad at anyone, it should be Mesa.
In 2016 Mesa came to IAH and undercut everyone.
That took XJT from 200 to 100 jets, 50% loss.
That also to OO from 100+ lines to 20 lines, an 80% loss,

That really started the XJT decline in my opinion.
That reminds me of the USAir flying Skywest took from XJT as part of the 2010 purchase. That’s a little known fact of the deal. XJT had a CPA negotiated when Skywest purchased XJT. And of course, Skywest took that flying. But the real decline of XJT started in 2008 with the Skywest underbid of the CAL CPA that XJT got stuck with. So no, if there is any anger, it should be directed at Skywest management.

Last edited by FXLAX; 09-15-2020 at 01:22 PM.
FXLAX is offline  
Old 09-15-2020, 05:58 PM
  #415  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 76
Default

FXLAX - you have WAY TOOOO much time on your hands, find a hobby....
flyfast2u is offline  
Old 09-15-2020, 06:15 PM
  #416  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 602
Default

Excellent history lesson, FXLAX. Relived some memories reading through that.
AboveMins is offline  
Old 09-15-2020, 07:14 PM
  #417  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 164
Default

Originally Posted by flyfast2u View Post
FXLAX - you have WAY TOOOO much time on your hands, find a hobby....
Those of us who love to fly love aviation. Both in the flying as well as the many other aspects of aviation. We get told to find a hobby a lot by our less committed peers so we are used to it.
FAR121 is offline  
Old 09-15-2020, 08:41 PM
  #418  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2020
Posts: 115
Default

Originally Posted by BigZ View Post
MQ pilots received an official word that you guys can jumpseat on us (seat in the back) till 13 October. Hopefully that'll make someone's flight home easier.
That's awesome. Thanks
Redheadtexas is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 05:08 AM
  #419  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 547
Default

Excellent Synopsis
I would add - Chataqua was using Express Jet's aircraft against them by bidding directly with CAL with those planes. Ream correctly saw through the scam and exercised the first right of refusal and kept the aircraft. Branded was intended to offset the cost of the planes. The only mistake in that decision was the horrendous paint job. The paint shop was in SHV so maybe the designer came from the Big Easy.
Spoiler is offline  
Old 09-16-2020, 05:12 AM
  #420  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by Spoiler View Post
Excellent Synopsis
I would add - Chataqua was using Express Jet's aircraft against them by bidding directly with CAL with those planes. Ream correctly saw through the scam and exercised the first right of refusal and kept the aircraft. Branded was intended to offset the cost of the planes. The only mistake in that decision was the horrendous paint job. The paint shop was in SHV so maybe the designer came from the Big Easy.
I remember Chitty Kitty using some clapped out CRJs, not our own ERJs against us.
AboveMins is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
R57 relay
American
222
01-17-2014 02:17 PM
Boneman
ExpressJet
16
12-10-2009 09:04 PM
Past V1
Regional
64
04-28-2008 03:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices