ExpressJet Flies West
#411
#412
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: lav dumper
Posts: 707
#413
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 360
Or may be the SKYW guys grow a pair and pay union dues like the balance of the industry
#414
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
ExpressJet Flies West
Not to mention the terrible CPAs eXJT signed when they were there own company haunted OO for a decade as after inc spent money to buy eXJT they had to float them money every quarter to stay alive to fulfill the CPA. The salt in the wound to inc was after the money losing contracts were up for renewal United balked at the price tag to make eXJT a viable carrier. United owned the planes and sent them to TSA and awarded C5 a second life as a jet operator.
Inc regrets buying eXJT more than eXJT hates inc because they failed at due diligence.
...if we are talking history
Inc regrets buying eXJT more than eXJT hates inc because they failed at due diligence.
...if we are talking history
That terrible CPA with CAL that XJT signed in 2008 was a direct consequence of Skywest undercutting the bid for that flying as part of the first attempt to buy XJT. That XJT CPA was literally the one Skywest negotiated with CAL. So there is only one place to put that blame...if we are talking REAL history.
OO didn't do there “due diligence”. And bid CPA rates as if OO was flying it. Only to realize that they couldn’t get XJT cost down to what OO thought they could.. the guy in charge was let go for the mistake, and they were never able to recover the loss... They started to shed the operation down to just the UA side. But still couldn't make it work..
Thats correct. Skywest wanted XJT pilots to take a 16% concession to bring them to parity to Skywest pilots’ pay. XJT MEC said they would only negotiate contract terms as part of a joint collective bargaining agreement. Of course Skywest had no desire in giving their pilots the ability to negotiate under the RLA.
I just can’t understand how express jet pilots still think that any line pilot at Skywest brought about their demise. Do you really think INC bought a company and didn’t try to make it profitable? Does that sound like a smart business decision? Just how gullible are you?
INC tried to make the XJT side more profitable.
The proposed way to do it was to have the XJT guys vote out their union which would allow a merge of the seniority lists by DOH.
The reasoning was because,
1) by the XJT contracts, the XJT pilots were too expensive for the aircraft that were being flown
2)you can’t merge a union and non-union seniority list
Let’s not forget that CC was not the CEO when the buy happened. He knew it wouldn’t work financially for either company, but when he took over it was his job make things happen.
Of course that was voted down bc there was no way XJT was going to vote out a union and take a $10/hr pay cut just to get a seniority list merge.
SO after all of that fell through and COVID happened,
UA bought XJT at their( still) high pay rates and let subohd drive them into the ground after promised contract negotiations.
That 10k per year that the senior CA’s made from 2013-2020 (70k over 7 years) will be lost in 7-8 months of not being employed now that UA shut XJT down.
It’s a huge bummer. I understand and empathize with both sides of that table.
Maybe hindsight was 20/20?
Would the XJT guys have been better off in 2020 being merged with OO which would have created a 7000 pilot “super regional”?
I don’t know, maybe, maybe not.
The proposed way to do it was to have the XJT guys vote out their union which would allow a merge of the seniority lists by DOH.
The reasoning was because,
1) by the XJT contracts, the XJT pilots were too expensive for the aircraft that were being flown
2)you can’t merge a union and non-union seniority list
Let’s not forget that CC was not the CEO when the buy happened. He knew it wouldn’t work financially for either company, but when he took over it was his job make things happen.
Of course that was voted down bc there was no way XJT was going to vote out a union and take a $10/hr pay cut just to get a seniority list merge.
SO after all of that fell through and COVID happened,
UA bought XJT at their( still) high pay rates and let subohd drive them into the ground after promised contract negotiations.
That 10k per year that the senior CA’s made from 2013-2020 (70k over 7 years) will be lost in 7-8 months of not being employed now that UA shut XJT down.
It’s a huge bummer. I understand and empathize with both sides of that table.
Maybe hindsight was 20/20?
Would the XJT guys have been better off in 2020 being merged with OO which would have created a 7000 pilot “super regional”?
I don’t know, maybe, maybe not.
This is (mostly) correct for what happened pre-buyout! My post was on post-buyout which is an important distinction.
It takes 15 seconds to google what happened between continental/XJT/OO in 2008.
That XJT contract was excellent.... for XJT.
Continental was unhappy with the XJT contract and was going to remove 51 XJT planes from operation.
Enter the 2008 SkyWest deal.
SkyWest would get the contract to fly continental routes IF, and only if, they bought XJT.
They bid $3.50/share when the valuation was $2.00/share at the time, which XJT turned down.
Eventually after XJT bleeds for long enough, SkyWest succeeded in buying XJT.
It’s basically the same story in 2010..
XJT costs are more expensive than their competitor (SkyWest) and then Continental in 2008/2010 wants to take flying away.
XJT costs are more expensive than their competitor (CommutAir) and then United 2020 takes all their flying away.
Also, how did OO force a money losing contract at
XJT in 2008?
I would imagine ALPA would have shut down a contract negotiated by the non-union devils at OO.....
Or maybe that was actually Continental’s fault?
/sarcasm.
It takes 15 seconds to google what happened between continental/XJT/OO in 2008.
That XJT contract was excellent.... for XJT.
Continental was unhappy with the XJT contract and was going to remove 51 XJT planes from operation.
Enter the 2008 SkyWest deal.
SkyWest would get the contract to fly continental routes IF, and only if, they bought XJT.
They bid $3.50/share when the valuation was $2.00/share at the time, which XJT turned down.
Eventually after XJT bleeds for long enough, SkyWest succeeded in buying XJT.
It’s basically the same story in 2010..
XJT costs are more expensive than their competitor (SkyWest) and then Continental in 2008/2010 wants to take flying away.
XJT costs are more expensive than their competitor (CommutAir) and then United 2020 takes all their flying away.
Also, how did OO force a money losing contract at
XJT in 2008?
I would imagine ALPA would have shut down a contract negotiated by the non-union devils at OO.....
Or maybe that was actually Continental’s fault?
/sarcasm.
This is when, before starting the next round in the negotiating/arbitration cycle, CAL threatened to pull 25% of the fleet from the CPA. This is where the 69 aircraft come from, (25% of 274 aircraft). CAL got CHQ to negotiate a CPA for those aircraft. But XJT had the first right of refusal on the 69 aircraft and the BOD authorized to keep them to start their own branded airline.
Branded started in April 2007 and ended in September 2008. Bad timing with oil ramped up the entire time, hitting at peak of almost $150/barrel on that last month of operation. The Branded flying included a charter division and then later flying for Delta Connection, with short stints with jetblue, frontier, and Midwest.
This is when skywest enters the picture, in early 2008. Again, CAL looking to change the negotiating environment, they now paid Skywest more than $6 million for due diligence into buying XJT and negotiating a new CPA. Once Skywest negotiated a new CPA and decided what they require from XJT in order to consummate the purchase, CAL tells XJT that if they don’t provide a CPA that had savings on the magnitude of the those negotiated by Skywest, they would immediately pull another 25% (51 aircraft this time) and give their one year notice of complete spool down of the remaining aircraft.
Just for more context, the original deal that Skywest made with CAL included a seperare CPA for Skywest to operate some of the EMB145s under their own certificate with their own pilots. They were currently working to certify the 145 under their ops specs. It also included a furlough of 700 pilots (twice as many as ultimately were furloughed), and a preferential interview to the furloughed pilots to fly the previously XJT operated 145s as a first year FO and obviously losing ALPA representation.
One of Skywest’s other demands was the removal of the pilots’ contract language requiring a complete three airline merger (ASA,XJT,SKW) and 16% concessions to bring down pilot costs into parity with Skywest. Contrary to popular belief, you can merge union and on-union airlines. Just look at DAL/NWA. Same thing that happened there would’ve happened here. In that case, all employee groups, except for the two pilot groups who were already union, voted out union representation. We pointed this out Skywest as well. Didn’t matter. The XJT MEC negotiated with Skywest but were unable to come to an agreement. It is true that one pass across the table from Skywest was to decertify but that was immediately turned down with a counter proposal that would have kept three separate airlines, with three separate contracts (work rules for Skywest), three separate seniority list and one merged list used solely for aircraft bidding. Obviously that never happened. The reason given was because Skywest pilots had recently (a couple years earlier) turned down a union vote and management didn’t want to go against that...conveniently, I may add.
Anyway, once the negotiations between the MEC and Skywest fell through, the entire deal fell through because Skywest wouldn’t budge on the contract concessions. The XJT BOD was then left with the decision of letting CAL wind down XJT or XJT signing the very same CPA that Skywest had negotiate in their due diligence. Of course that CPA had the 16% concessions built into it so it was immediately money losing.
So now instead of having a profitable CPA with CAL and a money losing operation in branded and charter, they now had two money losing operations with the need to place 69 aircraft somewhere. This is where the UAL CPA flying comes in. And later an imminent deal with USAir that Skywest ended up taking for themselves in the 2010 purchase of XJT.
So in the end, Skywest ends up buying XJT, which was operating under the same money losing CPA they negotiated. The unprofitability of XJT was directly attributable to Skywest’s actions.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...jt8k061108.htm
Just to add, OO did the deal with the understanding that it would be the SOLE Continental express carrier after the deal.
Little did we know, Continental and UA were already in talks and by the time the 2010 deal was done, Continental was a thing of the past.... and so was OO being the sole operator.
Also, is XJT is mad at anyone, it should be Mesa.
In 2016 Mesa came to IAH and undercut everyone.
That took XJT from 200 to 100 jets, 50% loss.
That also to OO from 100+ lines to 20 lines, an 80% loss,
That really started the XJT decline in my opinion.
Little did we know, Continental and UA were already in talks and by the time the 2010 deal was done, Continental was a thing of the past.... and so was OO being the sole operator.
Also, is XJT is mad at anyone, it should be Mesa.
In 2016 Mesa came to IAH and undercut everyone.
That took XJT from 200 to 100 jets, 50% loss.
That also to OO from 100+ lines to 20 lines, an 80% loss,
That really started the XJT decline in my opinion.
Last edited by FXLAX; 09-15-2020 at 01:22 PM.
#417
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 164
#419
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 547
Excellent Synopsis
I would add - Chataqua was using Express Jet's aircraft against them by bidding directly with CAL with those planes. Ream correctly saw through the scam and exercised the first right of refusal and kept the aircraft. Branded was intended to offset the cost of the planes. The only mistake in that decision was the horrendous paint job. The paint shop was in SHV so maybe the designer came from the Big Easy.
I would add - Chataqua was using Express Jet's aircraft against them by bidding directly with CAL with those planes. Ream correctly saw through the scam and exercised the first right of refusal and kept the aircraft. Branded was intended to offset the cost of the planes. The only mistake in that decision was the horrendous paint job. The paint shop was in SHV so maybe the designer came from the Big Easy.
#420
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 602
Excellent Synopsis
I would add - Chataqua was using Express Jet's aircraft against them by bidding directly with CAL with those planes. Ream correctly saw through the scam and exercised the first right of refusal and kept the aircraft. Branded was intended to offset the cost of the planes. The only mistake in that decision was the horrendous paint job. The paint shop was in SHV so maybe the designer came from the Big Easy.
I would add - Chataqua was using Express Jet's aircraft against them by bidding directly with CAL with those planes. Ream correctly saw through the scam and exercised the first right of refusal and kept the aircraft. Branded was intended to offset the cost of the planes. The only mistake in that decision was the horrendous paint job. The paint shop was in SHV so maybe the designer came from the Big Easy.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post