Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Retired Regionals > ExpressJet
Eagle Flying vs. Skywest / Expressjet >

Eagle Flying vs. Skywest / Expressjet

Search
Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

Eagle Flying vs. Skywest / Expressjet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2012, 07:21 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Posts: 205
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81 View Post


  • Skywest and Expressjet are kind of what could be considered the premium of regional carriers. Sure they are just regional carriers but they have been around a while, have made a ton of money, never went BK, hardly ever lose money and have a wicked heavy pilot group with respect to seniority. I can't imagine SKW or XJT are doing the flying any cheaper. If anything you would think it would be more expensive. Why not some cheapo (Gojetz style) carrier?
  • ERJ vs CRJ - Does anyone no for sure if one is more expensive to operate than the other? It would seem as if the CRJ is. I only say that because of the operational speeds and altitude differences. I know that ERJ can get up to the mid 30's easily fully loaded. That CRJ doesn't usually make it up there especially fully loaded. This has to impact efficiency.

Thoughts?
Well, on the legacy Expressjet side we hired something like 700-800 new pilots over the last two years, so we have about 1/4 of our group on first or second year FO pay, so despite having some really senior guys we have a lot of new people as well.

As far as the ERJ vs the CRJ I have no idea, but we are also the only company with the 145XRs, and they are better than 1/3 of the total fleet. They've got to be more efficient than just about any other 50 seater out there, at least in my opinion. They burn more gas in the climb but they climb to altitude WAY faster (was holding 3000 ft/min for a while with a full plane yesterday now that temps are coming down some), plus operating over longer ranges at higher altitudes means a higher percentage of time in the more efficient realm of flight. Plus, you can operate out of hot and high airports that I don't think you can get a CRJ-200 into.

That being said, I'm speculating and I really have no idea which plane (145 vs -200 in general) is more efficient in total from a combination of fuel+maintenance costs.

Now, on the legacy ASA side they definitely have a LOT of really senior people and not a lot of hiring over the past few years.
drrhythm2 is offline  
Old 09-17-2012, 10:53 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PerpetualFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Posts: 495
Default

American Eagle warns of 146 layoffs in Miami - South Florida Business Journal

Sooooo 77 furloughs at Eagle?
PerpetualFlyer is offline  
Old 09-17-2012, 11:13 AM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by PerpetualFlyer View Post
I believe the pilots and F/A's will simply transfer from NA to MQ and will not be layed off.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 09-17-2012, 05:30 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 346
Default

Recall letters have already gone out. Most guys don't meet ATP mins. I have heard that those with apps on file have been getting called for interviews but most do not have the mins either.
FlyingPirate is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
bgmann
Regional
31
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
bgmann
Regional
158
10-09-2009 05:59 PM
dd89
Flight Schools and Training
34
08-23-2009 11:08 AM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
35
01-25-2007 04:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices