Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Carry Over Trip Conflict? >

Carry Over Trip Conflict?

Search
Notices

Carry Over Trip Conflict?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2018, 06:51 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Position: 757
Posts: 146
Default Carry Over Trip Conflict?

Will a one day carry over trip knock out a complete block of R days in the first few days of the subsequent bid month or just the R day in conflict?

Thanks
MelT is offline  
Old 06-07-2018, 07:28 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Position: B767 FO
Posts: 195
Default

Depends on aircraft and domicile I believe. Unless everyone is now under the 2015 rules.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NewOldGuy is offline  
Old 06-08-2018, 08:28 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,418
Default

New Secondary system is live system wide,
kronan is offline  
Old 06-10-2018, 07:38 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Position: 757
Posts: 146
Default

Does anybody know then if this portion of the contract has been implemented?

Section 25.F.6.a:

"In the event of a phase-in conflict with an R-day(s) in the new bid period:
If other than a vacation conflict, the block containing that R-day(s) in the new bid period shall be dropped and the pilot shall be eligible to make-up an R-day value(s), as provided in Section 25.E.4., L.1., and L.6."

That looks to me like a one day carry in trip would knock out an entire block of R days that started on the first day of the bid month.

Has anybody been able to verify with personal experience that this will occur?

Thanks
MelT is offline  
Old 06-10-2018, 07:58 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 711
Default

Originally Posted by MelT View Post
Does anybody know then if this portion of the contract has been implemented?

Section 25.F.6.a:

"In the event of a phase-in conflict with an R-day(s) in the new bid period:
If other than a vacation conflict, the block containing that R-day(s) in the new bid period shall be dropped and the pilot shall be eligible to make-up an R-day value(s), as provided in Section 25.E.4., L.1., and L.6."

That looks to me like a one day carry in trip would knock out an entire block of R days that started on the first day of the bid month.

Has anybody been able to verify with personal experience that this will occur?

Thanks
Not personal experience, but it should be implemented in all seats starting now.
Raptor is offline  
Old 06-10-2018, 07:58 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

That’s the way it’s supposed to work. The CBA language is pretty unambiguous, so I think it’s safe to say that’s what will happen. But, I have no personal experience.

One other issue I noticed with the new secondary system. If someone is interested in trying to reduce or increase their vacation hours on their secondary line, the vacation must start in the bid month being scheduled. Same with the option to adjust the vacation footprint. In other words, if you slid a June vacation into July and now want to use that provision, you cannot. Just a heads up.

Someone else can back me up, but I don’t see that specific restriction in the CBA or LOA (although I won’t call my search “exhaustive”). Must have been decided during the colllaborative meetings held over the last 2-1/2 years leading up to implementation. Or, that’s just the way the company decided to interpret that when they put out the latest FCIF. Either way, it would be nice to have that spelled out in something that lasts longer than an FCIF.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 06-11-2018, 04:40 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Position: 757
Posts: 146
Default

Thanks for the replies. I will let you know what happens after the bid closes.
MelT is offline  
Old 06-13-2018, 11:30 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Position: 757
Posts: 146
Default

Well I wish I could report some results but I wasn't able to hold the line in question so I don't know for sure what would have happened.

Anybody with direct experience who could share the details would be appreciated.

Thanks again.
MelT is offline  
Old 06-14-2018, 09:56 AM
  #9  
Asst. Traveling Secretary
 
mikecweb's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 31
Default

It knocked out the whole block with one day conflicted.
mikecweb is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tennesseeflyboy
FedEx
28
08-15-2015 05:52 PM
IrishSkies
Cargo
1
11-09-2013 06:59 AM
Gunter
Cargo
12
05-31-2008 09:30 AM
2cylinderdriver
Cargo
186
04-02-2008 12:32 PM
MacGuy2
Cargo
2
11-09-2007 01:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices