Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Considering jumping ship >

Considering jumping ship

Search
Notices

Considering jumping ship

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2021, 05:51 PM
  #221  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 70
Default

Originally Posted by BlueMoon View Post
Which is kind of odd considering the Germanwings "crash" that happened a few years ago (the article does mentions it). I thought for sure that would setback and single pilot air carrier ops for a long time.
But weren't there two pilots on that?

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
Zudd is offline  
Old 02-07-2021, 06:04 PM
  #222  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 110
Default

Piddlepacks are the wave of the future.
PolicyWonk is offline  
Old 02-07-2021, 06:38 PM
  #223  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 3,032
Default

Originally Posted by Zudd View Post
But weren't there two pilots on that?

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
There was, up until the point one went to the bathroom (the captain) and was locked out of the flight deck by the remaining pilot (The FO).
BlueMoon is offline  
Old 02-07-2021, 06:54 PM
  #224  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 70
Default

Originally Posted by BlueMoon View Post
There was, up until the point one went to the bathroom (the captain) and was locked out of the flight deck by the remaining pilot (The FO).
I know. Just sayin

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
Zudd is offline  
Old 02-07-2021, 08:03 PM
  #225  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Thrust Hold's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Position: 757 CA
Posts: 594
Default

Originally Posted by Zudd View Post
I know. Just sayin

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
Which changed policies for foreign operators. US carriers were already safeguarding against such acts.
Thrust Hold is online now  
Old 02-07-2021, 09:34 PM
  #226  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 687
Default

It certainly appears to be an intractable problem to me. Gotta have someone on the airplane to control it for reasons of potential jamming/interference/etc. Person on plane must be able to override any external guidance for similar reasons. Can't have one person riding around who can crash the airplane unopposed (remember the old joke about the pilot and the dog...). Therefore two pilots until perhaps onboard AI, and I don't think that's exactly right over the horzion.

I am also no expert.
CardboardCutout is offline  
Old 02-07-2021, 09:35 PM
  #227  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2021
Posts: 446
Default

Originally Posted by Thrust Hold View Post
Which changed policies for foreign operators. US carriers were already safeguarding against such acts.
For passenger aircraft, just saying...
BrianH is offline  
Old 02-08-2021, 07:14 AM
  #228  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Overnitefr8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 767 CA
Posts: 1,876
Default

Originally Posted by BrianH View Post
For passenger aircraft, just saying...
Maybe that's why the lav is in the cockpit on the 767
Overnitefr8 is offline  
Old 02-08-2021, 07:29 AM
  #229  
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Margaritaville's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,853
Default

Originally Posted by Python1287 View Post
How does everyone feel about Amazon’s new purchase? Starting to own planes outright. Only a dozen, but every long journey begins with a first step. And they certainly have no issues with funding a long journey.

https://www.businessinsider.com/amaz...ng-767s-2021-1
Amazon is going to continue to use the 2000's legacy/regional airline model of a "portfolio of carriers" that they can whipsaw against each other. Amazon owning the planes only makes it that much more viable, because they can really pressure the competing carriers to cut costs, or they take the planes away and give them to someone else. They would be stupid to start an in house carrier, on their own certificate, and take on all that overhead.

Amazon would have to have a 500 aircraft fleet to carry all of their own stuff, plus have room to carry for others. AWS is successful because it doesn't take a huge investment in infrastructure like running an airline does. I wouldn't be surprised to see them spin AWS off at some point either. Like someone said above, Amazon has reached the top of their growth curve. Everyone who is going to use amazon already does. Amazon already has their money in Prime fees, and needs to move the boxes as cheaply as possible. They don't care about quality like FDX and UPS do, if there's a problem, they just refund your money. It's pennies on the sidewalk to them. FDX and UPS will always have the niche of carrying for everyone else who cares about quality. Let amazon be amazon they're no threat to UPS and FDX.
Margaritaville is offline  
Old 02-08-2021, 07:51 AM
  #230  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 3,032
Default

Originally Posted by Thrust Hold View Post
Which changed policies for foreign operators. US carriers were already safeguarding against such acts.
They actually changed to rule back to the original rule and now leave it up to the individual airline.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39749803


.The European Aviation Safety Agency, which was behind the original rule change, relaxed the requirements last year to allow individual airlines to evaluate their own safety needs.

BDL said that its airlines had "independently" reviewed the rules and decided that the two-person rule had no safety benefits - and could actually be more dangerous.
BlueMoon is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MGMTiswatchingU
Mesa Airlines
50
03-07-2018 05:53 PM
MrMeeseeks
Spirit
142
11-28-2017 06:16 AM
sixfootglass
Regional
44
01-08-2008 08:25 PM
ExperimentalAB
Regional
17
05-03-2007 10:04 AM
AV8ER
Regional
33
03-27-2007 01:10 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices