Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Considering jumping ship >

Considering jumping ship

Search

Notices

Considering jumping ship

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2021 | 02:03 PM
  #221  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Fr8Master
As someone who in a previous life worked very intimately with the FAA, I’m in a good position to say that this is not going to happen in the next two to three decades. This was before the political pressure faced by Boeing now that they proved their “computerized safety devices” actually make planes more likely to crash. And that is just talking about one country...now get every country those planes fly over to sign on to a single pilot type certificated wide body.
Agreed, the NAS is not ready for single pilot ops on a large scale. Add an emergency aircraft into the mix and it gets really interesting fast. It is not going to happen in my career.
Reply
Old 02-07-2021 | 05:51 PM
  #222  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BlueMoon
Which is kind of odd considering the Germanwings "crash" that happened a few years ago (the article does mentions it). I thought for sure that would setback and single pilot air carrier ops for a long time.
But weren't there two pilots on that?

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 02-07-2021 | 06:04 PM
  #223  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Default

Piddlepacks are the wave of the future.
Reply
Old 02-07-2021 | 06:38 PM
  #224  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by Zudd
But weren't there two pilots on that?

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
There was, up until the point one went to the bathroom (the captain) and was locked out of the flight deck by the remaining pilot (The FO).
Reply
Old 02-07-2021 | 06:54 PM
  #225  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BlueMoon
There was, up until the point one went to the bathroom (the captain) and was locked out of the flight deck by the remaining pilot (The FO).
I know. Just sayin

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 02-07-2021 | 08:03 PM
  #226  
Thrust Hold's Avatar
Line Holder
5M Airline Miles
5 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 717
Likes: 21
From: 767 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Zudd
I know. Just sayin

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
Which changed policies for foreign operators. US carriers were already safeguarding against such acts.
Reply
Old 02-07-2021 | 09:34 PM
  #227  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 771
Likes: 25
Default

It certainly appears to be an intractable problem to me. Gotta have someone on the airplane to control it for reasons of potential jamming/interference/etc. Person on plane must be able to override any external guidance for similar reasons. Can't have one person riding around who can crash the airplane unopposed (remember the old joke about the pilot and the dog...). Therefore two pilots until perhaps onboard AI, and I don't think that's exactly right over the horzion.

I am also no expert.
Reply
Old 02-07-2021 | 09:35 PM
  #228  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Thrust Hold
Which changed policies for foreign operators. US carriers were already safeguarding against such acts.
For passenger aircraft, just saying...
Reply
Old 02-08-2021 | 07:14 AM
  #229  
Overnitefr8's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 0
From: 767 CA
Default

Originally Posted by BrianH
For passenger aircraft, just saying...
Maybe that's why the lav is in the cockpit on the 767
Reply
Old 02-08-2021 | 07:29 AM
  #230  
Margaritaville's Avatar
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by Python1287
How does everyone feel about Amazon’s new purchase? Starting to own planes outright. Only a dozen, but every long journey begins with a first step. And they certainly have no issues with funding a long journey.

https://www.businessinsider.com/amaz...ng-767s-2021-1
Amazon is going to continue to use the 2000's legacy/regional airline model of a "portfolio of carriers" that they can whipsaw against each other. Amazon owning the planes only makes it that much more viable, because they can really pressure the competing carriers to cut costs, or they take the planes away and give them to someone else. They would be stupid to start an in house carrier, on their own certificate, and take on all that overhead.

Amazon would have to have a 500 aircraft fleet to carry all of their own stuff, plus have room to carry for others. AWS is successful because it doesn't take a huge investment in infrastructure like running an airline does. I wouldn't be surprised to see them spin AWS off at some point either. Like someone said above, Amazon has reached the top of their growth curve. Everyone who is going to use amazon already does. Amazon already has their money in Prime fees, and needs to move the boxes as cheaply as possible. They don't care about quality like FDX and UPS do, if there's a problem, they just refund your money. It's pennies on the sidewalk to them. FDX and UPS will always have the niche of carrying for everyone else who cares about quality. Let amazon be amazon they're no threat to UPS and FDX.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MGMTiswatchingU
Mesa Airlines
50
03-07-2018 05:53 PM
MrMeeseeks
Spirit
142
11-28-2017 06:16 AM
sixfootglass
Regional
44
01-08-2008 08:25 PM
ExperimentalAB
Regional
17
05-03-2007 10:04 AM
AV8ER
Regional
33
03-27-2007 01:10 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices