A350s
06-27-2021, 04:25 PM
#31
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Originally Posted by threeighteen
One 767 does not replace an MD-11.
Almost 60 MD-11s need to be replaced at some point and using two 767s to replace one MD-11 would consume even more gate space than a 777XF. The gate space issue will need to be solved by changing the whole operation somehow, some way.
Almost 60 MD-11s need to be replaced at some point and using two 767s to replace one MD-11 would consume even more gate space than a 777XF. The gate space issue will need to be solved by changing the whole operation somehow, some way.
06-28-2021, 06:14 AM
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: Two Wheeler FrontSeat
Posts: 1,162
Originally Posted by threeighteen
One 767 does not replace an MD-11.
Almost 60 MD-11s need to be replaced at some point and using two 767s to replace one MD-11 would consume even more gate space than a 777XF. The gate space issue will need to be solved by changing the whole operation somehow, some way.
Almost 60 MD-11s need to be replaced at some point and using two 767s to replace one MD-11 would consume even more gate space than a 777XF. The gate space issue will need to be solved by changing the whole operation somehow, some way.
The gate space issue can be solve by opening more hubs/bases or utilizing what we already have. I think once IND is complete they can start to shift more freight that way. Plus to rule out Greensboro, Miami or even Newark if they really need to
06-28-2021, 09:15 AM
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,090
Originally Posted by StarClipper
The gate space issue can be solve by opening more hubs/bases or utilizing what we already have. I think once IND is complete they can start to shift more freight that way. Plus to rule out Greensboro, Miami or even Newark if they really need to
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
