TA???? Rumors???
#341
He did.
My fingers are crossed for the video.
.
#342
Signing bonus is a no vote from me. The only way, the absolute only way to get a contract in a timely manner is to get full retro pay. Otherwise, the longer the company drags their feet, the more money they save and they know it. I know some on this board don't want that because it rewards people who flew extra, but so be it. Negotiating for a signing bonus is stupid, and will hurt us when we try to get the next contract.
Full retro or vote no!
What we should not expect is an adjustment to our pay checks in years past that would reflect retroactive pay rate increases. That would involve recomputing our taxes, and more importantly, The Company's taxes for past years. The Company won't do that.
Our MEC will have a say in how the money is divided and dispersed. Thanks to past cases where ALPA pilots sued their own union, ALPA policy will require that dollar values be computed and an appeal process will be followed to address anyone who disagrees with their computed share. Expect a large proportion of the individual dollar value early on in the process. The amount may be split over multiple tax years if that is determined to be advantageous to pilots. A small percentage of the total will be held back to cover the possibility that errors were made or appeals were granted, and then the final small portion will be dispersed.
Our concern should be how much, and how is it divided and distributed. The MEC will make that determination. We should all let our Local Council Reps know our opinions as to how the money is divided.
So, pay no attention to what it's called. Focus on how much it is. Self-inflicted gunshot wounds in the foot are not helpful.
.
#343
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 32
From: 4A2FU
The name is not as important as how it's computed. The dollars should equal or exceed the value of the money we did NOT receive in compensation and benefits (such as Defined Contribution rates and contributions) due to the delay in raising our pay rates. If that criteria is met, I don't care what it's called.
What we should not expect is an adjustment to our pay checks in years past that would reflect retroactive pay rate increases. That would involve recomputing our taxes, and more importantly, The Company's taxes for past years. The Company won't do that.
Our MEC will have a say in how the money is divided and dispersed. Thanks to past cases where ALPA pilots sued their own union, ALPA policy will require that dollar values be computed and an appeal process will be followed to address anyone who disagrees with their computed share. Expect a large proportion of the individual dollar value early on in the process. The amount may be split over multiple tax years if that is determined to be advantageous to pilots. A small percentage of the total will be held back to cover the possibility that errors were made or appeals were granted, and then the final small portion will be dispersed.
Our concern should be how much, and how is it divided and distributed. The MEC will make that determination. We should all let our Local Council Reps know our opinions as to how the money is divided.
So, pay no attention to what it's called. Focus on how much it is. Self-inflicted gunshot wounds in the foot are not helpful.
.
What we should not expect is an adjustment to our pay checks in years past that would reflect retroactive pay rate increases. That would involve recomputing our taxes, and more importantly, The Company's taxes for past years. The Company won't do that.
Our MEC will have a say in how the money is divided and dispersed. Thanks to past cases where ALPA pilots sued their own union, ALPA policy will require that dollar values be computed and an appeal process will be followed to address anyone who disagrees with their computed share. Expect a large proportion of the individual dollar value early on in the process. The amount may be split over multiple tax years if that is determined to be advantageous to pilots. A small percentage of the total will be held back to cover the possibility that errors were made or appeals were granted, and then the final small portion will be dispersed.
Our concern should be how much, and how is it divided and distributed. The MEC will make that determination. We should all let our Local Council Reps know our opinions as to how the money is divided.
So, pay no attention to what it's called. Focus on how much it is. Self-inflicted gunshot wounds in the foot are not helpful.
.
#344
Banned
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
SLOW CLAP…..YESSSSSS
Historically it has been calculated on bid guarantee. I would assume the same going forward.
#346
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Right for a long time
Would rather be paid and made whole for all of those extensions. An 84 hour involuntary can easily turn into 120+ when there are no deadheads to get you home or you have crew rest changes after the last landing overseas. We are letting the company off too cheap if we don't recoup all of that.
#347
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
Would rather be paid and made whole for all of those extensions. An 84 hour involuntary can easily turn into 120+ when there are no deadheads to get you home or you have crew rest changes after the last landing overseas. We are letting the company off too cheap if we don't recoup all of that.
#348
I hate to bring bad news but the company will never agree to retro pay. That would require them (and you) to make changes to prior years tax filings etc etc.
The union has addressed this before in previous Contract Q&As.
The union has addressed this before in previous Contract Q&As.
#350
At FedEx it has never been "calculated on bid guarantee" and "more factors." Historically we have received one of six fractions of the total sum allotted by The Company. Only one factor has determined the individual pilot's fraction.
(Talk to your pilot buddy and he/she can fill you in.)
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



