Search

Notices

TA???? Rumors???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2022 | 01:00 PM
  #371  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by HvypurplePylot
100% that's why all these little squabbles to divide us all up is just one big management play to keep us divided. Just like the different fleet lanyards.
Sounds like the current US political landscape
Reply
Old 10-02-2022 | 03:59 AM
  #372  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Fetal in the hub
Default

Originally Posted by Nightflyer
I am tired of hearing people complain about this. The union came out and said not to give people a hard time about it, but there you go again.

We ARE NOT in self help. You are ADVOCATING for an ILLEGAL WORK ACTION that can bite us, big time.

While I am not a fan of draft at this particular time, beating on people who make that personal choice only serves to divide us.

STOP IT!
An individuals opinion about the actions of their fellow pilots is not advocating a job action. Your position presumes that somehow that opinion has changed since negotiations began.

Many of us were critical of the Blue man group long before this round of negotiations began. those decisions are selfish at anytime and counter productive to the health of the current and future work force. But this group is full of if it works for me that's all that matters. That puts the individual ahead of the group. There is no cohesion down that path.

Management need do nothing.
Reply
Old 10-02-2022 | 08:29 PM
  #373  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Shaman
An individuals opinion about the actions of their fellow pilots is not advocating a job action. Your position presumes that somehow that opinion has changed since negotiations began.

Many of us were critical of the Blue man group long before this round of negotiations began. those decisions are selfish at anytime and counter productive to the health of the current and future work force. But this group is full of if it works for me that's all that matters. That puts the individual ahead of the group. There is no cohesion down that path.

Management need do nothing.

I never thought I would say this but I am now in favor of a credit cap per month like other airlines have. It would fix this problem.
Reply
Old 10-03-2022 | 08:57 AM
  #374  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 237
Likes: 23
Default

Originally Posted by Noworkallplay
I never thought I would say this but I am now in favor of a credit cap per month like other airlines have. It would fix this problem.
It would also “fix” our ability to work more in one month and be able to take a good part of the next month off. What would you limit it to? There are so many unintended consequences of something like this. If you think that limiting CH just so every 5-6 years, no one can fly extra during negotiations, your nuts.
Reply
Old 10-03-2022 | 10:11 AM
  #375  
TonyC's Avatar
Organizational Learning 
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,948
Likes: 0
From: Directly behind the combiner
Default

Originally Posted by Freighthumper

It would also “fix” our ability to work more in one month and be able to take a good part of the next month off. What would you limit it to? There are so many unintended consequences of something like this. If you think that limiting CH just so every 5-6 years, no one can fly extra during negotiations, your nuts.

The goalposts for this particular round of negotiations have been set, so this discussion doesn't really fit in a thread about TA rumors. But since you've mentioned it.

A CAP system wouldn't work without a corresponding BANK system to allow for exactly what you're talking about. Under such a system hours worked above the cap would be banked and could be used to complement fewer hours worked in subsequent months.

While I don't think a Cap & Bank system would be widely accepted among FedEx pilots during "normal" times, I've always thought a Cap & Bank system would go a long ways toward the "Share the pain" goal of what was once our Section 4.a.2.b. (now § 4.a.2.c.). I wouldn't mind also seeing it triggered at the amendable date of a CBA. In both cases, it would motivate The Company to act in our interest to remove §4.a.2.c. or negotiate a CBA in an expeditious fashion.


But it would be a huge paradigm change, and unlikely to ever gain popular support. Back to our regularly scheduled negotiations.






.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Crawl
CommuteAir
5416
03-21-2020 06:45 AM
skylover
Aviation Law
482
11-14-2013 08:20 PM
Homa
Major
35
07-21-2010 12:53 PM
RockBottom
Major
2
08-20-2006 08:30 AM
LOW FUEL
Regional
1
07-06-2006 05:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices