Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   FedEx (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/)
-   -   System Bid has been posted (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/142422-system-bid-has-been-posted.html)

Sluggo_63 05-05-2023 10:57 AM


Originally Posted by threeighteen (Post 3632984)
bump and flush honors seniority, current system does not.

there are currently people who are junior to me on my airplane in my base getting seats that I cannot hold because they bid 757 CA and now are getting kicked out of 757 CA even though they’ve never gone to training as a 757 captain and never will.

that does not honor seniority. If you think it does, you don’t understand what seniority is. And yes, if you get kicked out of your seat, you shouldn’t be able to hold something that your seniority doesn’t allow.

Ok. Suit yourself. But remember this conversation when the TA comes out and everyone is saying "vote on what's right for the crew force, not for you as an individual pilot."

threeighteen 05-05-2023 11:27 AM


Originally Posted by Sluggo_63 (Post 3632986)
Ok. Suit yourself. But remember this conversation when the TA comes out and everyone is saying "vote on what's right for the crew force, not for you as an individual pilot."

that lacks relevance

threeighteen 05-06-2023 12:35 AM


Originally Posted by oncewasgood (Post 3633137)
Tell me where they touched you Johnny. Tell me where it hurts.

You want every seat and domicile reran every vacancy bid to recapture what someone choose not to bid on a previous posting. Not possible and doesn’t occur ANYWHERE. No vacancy nothing to bid on. That simple. Pilot in a domicile that closes bids what he can hold in said vacancy bid. Simple. Get it?

Yes I do.

Here's how other airlines do displacement bids:

Starting at the top, you get keep your seat unless you can no longer keep your base/equipment/seat. If you can't keep your base/equipment/seat, then you get to bid for ANY seat that your systemwide seniority can still hold. If you end up bumping someone out of that seat, then they get to bid for whatever base/equipment/seat they can hold, and if they bump someone, then the same thing happens. It's the only fair way to do it that honors seniority.

Your argument supports these two F'd up things that are currently happening here:

"because a certain seat that a senior pilot could have held wasn't their first choice, they should be stuck with whatever has vacancies while pilots junior to them get to hold what was the senior pilot's second choice on the last bid"

"because someone hired 3 years ago waited to hold a certain base/equipment seat (lets say 777FO) instead of bidding 757 captain, a pilot junior to them that bid 757 captain should get 777 FO before them"

Because we basically gave up displacement bids with the 2015 and everything is now a system bid both of those things are happening under the current system and that is beyond screwed up. What if the senior pilot never even got to train on the seat they wanted due to the screwed up nature of our bidding/training? Now they are getting pushed out out of that and can only go to seats that have vacancies... while the junior pilot gets to keep a seat that their seniority honestly can't hold and your only argument for them keeping it is "well that should have been the senior pilot's first choice...." if you can't see how F'd up that is you need help.

It would be one thing to allow a junior pilot to keep a seat that a senior pilot passed up for QOL on a normal system bid, but on a bid where base/equipment/seat are being eliminated and pilots are getting kicked out of their number one choice, it's not the same; and once again, if you can't see that, you need help.

Flying Boxes 05-06-2023 12:49 AM


Originally Posted by threeighteen (Post 3633157)
Yes I do.

Here's how other airlines do displacement bids:

Starting at the top, you get keep your seat unless you can no longer keep your base/equipment/seat. If you can't keep your base/equipment/seat, then you get to bid for ANY seat that your systemwide seniority can still hold. If you end up bumping someone out of that seat, then they get to bid for whatever base/equipment/seat they can hold, and if they bump someone, then the same thing happens. It's the only fair way to do it that honors seniority.

Your argument supports these two F'd up things that are currently happening here:

"because a certain seat that a senior pilot could have held wasn't their first choice, they should be stuck with whatever has vacancies while pilots junior to them get to hold what was the senior pilot's second choice on the last bid"

"because someone hired 3 years ago waited to hold a certain base/equipment seat (lets say 777FO) instead of bidding 757 captain, a pilot junior to them that bid 757 captain should get 777 FO before them"

Because we basically gave up displacement bids with the 2015 and everything is now a system bid both of those things are happening under the current system and that is beyond screwed up. What if the senior pilot never even got to train on the seat they wanted due to the screwed up nature of our bidding/training? Now they are getting pushed out out of that and can only go to seats that have vacancies... while the junior pilot gets to keep a seat that their seniority honestly can't hold and your only argument for them keeping it is "well that should have been the senior pilot's first choice...." if you can't see how F'd up that is you need help.

It would be one thing to allow a junior pilot to keep a seat that a senior pilot passed up for QOL on a normal system bid, but on a bid where base/equipment/seat are being eliminated and pilots are getting kicked out of their number one choice, it's not the same; and once again, if you can't see that, you need help.

I think you just described how section 24 works! I your hypothetical scenario the senior pilot got what he bid in previous bid based on seniority. In subsequent bid, since he is not being bumped out of his seat/base he can only go to seats with vacancies.

if he is bumped (or stands in) then he can go whatever ever his seniority can hold.

threeighteen 05-06-2023 01:11 AM


Originally Posted by Flying Boxes (Post 3633158)
I think you just described how section 24 works! I your hypothetical scenario the senior pilot got what he bid in previous bid based on seniority. In subsequent bid, since he is not being bumped out of his seat/base he can only go to seats with vacancies.

if he is bumped (or stands in) then he can go whatever ever his seniority can hold.

No, here's the problem, if a pilot is bumped, under the new section 24 rules, that pilot can only go to seats with vacancies... The company gets to manipulate the vacancies/staffing level however they want.

So what if, theoretically, the only seats with vacancies were 757 FO? An MD11 CA could be forced to 757 FO under the current language, while pilots junior to that pilot would get to keep their 777 and 767 CA slots.

That's the problem with the new section 24 language. We gave up so much to the company just so a handful of dudes could feel like they are picking the month they train in, except they can only pick the month when the company feels like offering training to them, so it's purely the illusion of choice. It would be better to go back to when we had passover pay, bumping rights, and could trade training slots.

Flying Boxes 05-06-2023 01:28 AM


Originally Posted by threeighteen (Post 3633159)
No, here's the problem, if a pilot is bumped, under the new section 24 rules, that pilot can only go to seats with vacancies... The company gets to manipulate the vacancies/staffing level however they want.

So what if, theoretically, the only seats with vacancies were 757 FO? An MD11 CA could be forced to 757 FO under the current language, while pilots junior to that pilot would get to keep their 777 and 767 CA slots.

That's the problem with the new section 24 language. We gave up so much just so a handful of dudes could feel like they are picking the month they train in, except they can only pick the month when the company feels like offering training to them, so that's really more of the illusion of choice. It would be better to go back to when we had passover pay, bumping rights, and could trade training slots.

MD-11CL & MD-11 CA did go to B777 CM & B777CA. Because they LAX is closing and every LAX captain is senior to most junior B777 captain in MEM & ANC. Seniority is honored even though the # of B777CM is being reduced .the junior captains now can bump anyone off any seat there seniority can hold!

if a senior pilot that is not in seat being reduced, his/her only option is a vacancy IF their seniority can hold it.

threeighteen 05-06-2023 01:37 AM


Originally Posted by Flying Boxes (Post 3633161)
MD-11CL & MD-11 CA did go to B777 CM & B777CA. Because they LAX is closing and every LAX captain is senior to most junior B777 captain in MEM & ANC. Seniority is honored even though the # of B777CM is being reduced .the junior captains now can bump anyone off any seat there seniority can hold!

if a senior pilot that is not in seat being reduced, his/her only option is a vacancy IF their seniority can hold it.

Yes in those specific examples it honored seniority. However it doesn't in all examples anymore. It used to under the old sec 24, now it doesn't.

Flying Boxes 05-06-2023 01:48 AM


Originally Posted by threeighteen (Post 3633163)
Yes in those specific examples it honored seniority. However it doesn't in all examples anymore. It used to under the old sec 24, now it doesn't.

Clearly show how it didn’t! Give an example please.

threeighteen 05-06-2023 02:00 AM


Originally Posted by Flying Boxes (Post 3633170)
Clearly show how it didn’t! Give an example please.

Several JUNIOR pilots who were awarded 757 captain but never trained got 777 FO seats while dudes that fly the same airplane as they do, and are several hundred names higher on the seniority list are not getting 777FO seats. That's not honoring seniority.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:40 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands