Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
What Am I Missing Here? >

What Am I Missing Here?

Search

Notices

What Am I Missing Here?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2023 | 08:52 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 32
From: 4A2FU
Default

Originally Posted by Iwa Washi
New contract language is not added unless someone wants to try something different.

Under the current CBA, a pilot ON RESERVE can not be assigned a trip that extends more than two hours into their day off - Base Hotel Standby or not. I'll take my own personal, first-hand experience on that over someone else's opinion. When the company tried that on me, I stood up for myself, defended the contract, and they backed down quicker than ALPA could answer the DART. With this new addition, the company will feel emboldened to press-to-test that again.

Now, I am telling you all that having the word "assigned" and "base hotel standby" combined with the current, stand alone operational extension language, all together in a single, additional paragraph in this TA is a really freaking bad idea.

But hell, don't take my word for it. Go ahead and vote 'yes" and find out for yourself.
You’re spot on. This is a huge give that nobody is even talking about. Heck, you might not even get the extension pay for the extension with the way this is worded.
Reply
Old 07-07-2023 | 08:57 PM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 23
From: Crewmember
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen
You’re spot on. This is a huge give that nobody is even talking about. Heck, you might not even get the extension pay for the extension with the way this is worded.
I agree. It sounds like the company could argue you will get paid straight pay for the extra days into your time off.

At the very least, this should be clarified and made crystal clear, before we lose the grievance over it.

Another reason to vote no.
Reply
Old 07-07-2023 | 09:02 PM
  #13  
DLax85's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 0
From: Gear Monkey
Default

Originally Posted by Iwa Washi
New contract language is not added unless someone wants to try something different.

Under the current CBA, a pilot ON RESERVE can not be assigned a trip that extends more than two hours into their day off - Base Hotel Standby or not. I'll take my own personal, first-hand experience on that over someone else's opinion. When the company tried that on me, I stood up for myself, defended the contract, and they backed down quicker than ALPA could answer the DART. With this new addition, the company will feel emboldened to press-to-test that again.

Now, I am telling you all that having the words "assigned" and "base hotel standby" combined with the current, stand alone operational extension language, all together in a single, additional paragraph in this TA is a really freaking bad idea.

But hell, don't take my word for it. Go ahead and vote 'yes" and find out for yourself.
The “Yes” voters are confident they won’t be:
Assigned Hotel Stby
Awarded new R16 Lines
Bidding LCA Lines
Selling Back Vacation then Not working
Building a retirement under the MBCB Plan

…Or remotely worried any reduction in total pilots needed will affect them

They are concerned about $$, not QOL, and are confident their current relative seniority can protect them from the concessions

They will be unaffected by any of the givebacks

They are retiring within 3-5 years and are using the TVM argument to mask a much, much bigger concern of their cohort.

NO voters understand the company wants a deal because they saw a 99% strike vote, and an opportunity to gain tactical advantage on UPS going into peak.

All leverage that will still exist after a NO vote.

ReGroup. ReSurvey. ReFocus. ReNegotiate.

DAL, SWA, and UAL have all done it successfully. It can be done here as well.

The company looks past the NC and MEC - straight at the pilots - what will they see this time?

How will that picture affect the future?

Vote wisely!

In Transparency, Integrity and Unity (for Everyome),
DLax

Last edited by DLax85; 07-07-2023 at 09:15 PM.
Reply
Old 07-08-2023 | 03:24 AM
  #14  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Fedex
Default

[QUOTE=Stan446;3661179][QUOTE=

If you are coming to this forum for a clear answer other than, " the company is going to screw you", you are in the wrong place. No one here is going to tell you anything accurate or positive. [/QUOTE]

Stan446, why do you keep posting here daily ad nauseam then? Do you have nothing else to do????????
Reply
Old 07-08-2023 | 04:17 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Fetal in the hub
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
Untrue, which was the point of this change. Not saying this is going to sway anyone, but in the interest of accuracy it's probably worth mentioning. It really bothers me when people start making stuff into a problem when it's not. Under the current CBA, say a pilot had base hotel standby from Monday to Friday. He gets launched Wednesday on a trip that goes to Monday. Yes - that is completely possible/legal and happened multiple times to pilots during Covid when the entire HKG bid pack was published as base hotel standby. He is not viewed as "launched" on a trip by the current CBA calculations until the assigned trip shows on Wed. The standby duty on Mon and Tues has no bearing on the situation. There is no overage for the extra days Sat to Mon. Those are paid at straight time. There is no standard overage (150%/200%) until a SECOND trip extension after the first extension that ends Monday. This change in the TA honors the first trip extension with the same limits as any other domestic or international trip and ensures overage is paid for the first extension.
25M.1.c "If a reserve assignment operationally extends more than 2 hours into a pilot’s day off, he shall accrue reserve overage (as described in Section 4.BB.8.b.), and shall have the ability to drop a subsequent R-day, if any, in the current bid period without pay. CRS shall make reasonable efforts to accommodate a pilot’s request as to the subsequent R-day to be dropped. Such R-day shall be at the beginning or end of a block of R-days remaining on his line, unless the pilot agrees otherwise."

4.BB.8.b "b. If a reserve trip extends more than 2 hours into time scheduled free from duty at base on a non R-day, overage CH shall be computed as trip rig for the period from scheduled trip termination until actual trip termination. Overage CH shall be applied as follows:
  • i. CH accrued on an R-day shall be applied toward leveling and credited toward RLG at 100%.
  • ii. CH accrued on time scheduled free from duty on a non R-day shall be applied toward leveling only at 100% and shall be compensated in addition to BLG/RLG at 150% of the pilot’s normal pay rate."
That's what the contract says. It does not square with what you stated at all. If I'm missing something in the language let's all discuss it.
Reply
Old 07-08-2023 | 04:34 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Fetal in the hub
Default

Originally Posted by Iwa Washi
New contract language is not added unless someone wants to try something different.

Under the current CBA, a pilot ON RESERVE can not be assigned a trip that extends more than two hours into their day off - Base Hotel Standby or not. I'll take my own personal, first-hand experience on that over someone else's opinion. When the company tried that on me, I stood up for myself, defended the contract, and they backed down quicker than ALPA could answer the DART. With this new addition, the company will feel emboldened to press-to-test that again.

Now, I am telling you all that having the words "assigned" and "base hotel standby" combined with the current, stand alone operational extension language, all together in a single, additional paragraph in this TA is a really freaking bad idea.

But hell, don't take my word for it. Go ahead and vote 'yes" and find out for yourself.
Ok on further review looks like we're talking about different things Adlerdriver is talking about having a HTSBY pairing off the bat that is extended. This conversation is about R-24 being assigned HTSBY and then being extended into days of or being initially assigned a HTSBY that goes into days off. The former they CAN do but the must pay you for the overage. The latter they cannot do (without your consent). If you don't know they can't that's like consenting.
Reply
Old 07-08-2023 | 05:33 AM
  #17  
jzuniga's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: 777 bound!
Default

“They are concerned about $$, not QOL, and are confident their current relative seniority can protect them from the concessions”

There is no such thing as seniority anymore. You can walk out the door and be revised into something that is nothing at all what you were awarded with minimal repercussions to the company. We should be getting paid 200%, or at the very least 175% for the WHOLE trip if you are revised. The company uses the revision process as a scheduling tool and this should have been fixed with this TA! I know cause this has happened to me, and others multiple times.

JZ
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eraops
Regional
11
01-18-2016 07:59 AM
iceman49
Safety
1
08-16-2015 10:37 AM
Iron Maiden
Career Questions
1
02-04-2015 04:20 PM
ShyGuy
Safety
310
01-28-2015 02:36 PM
rachaelroth
Safety
95
04-07-2014 09:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices