![]() |
Originally Posted by Rock;[url=tel:3674910
3674910[/url]]Take a look at how shareholders and customers reacted to the pending UPS strike. Unlike us, the teamsters aren’t under the RLA. They’ve struck before and they’ll probably strike in the future. Their threat to strike is very real. And they were days away just a week ago. I’ll attach a link to their 1 month stock price look back. Certainly shareholders didn’t seem to care about a pending strike. And if UPS was losing customers, it didn’t show up in our bid pack. Our lines have been shrinking for months.
I agree that it’s bad to **** on the limited leverage we have. But it’s possibly worse to think we have leverage we don’t have. Nothing worse than pulling out what you think is your winning card, and having the guy across the table chuckle, pull out his winning hand and take the pot. I’ve asked several times in the last week what leverage people think we have moving into a new round of negotiations. I’d really like to know. I haven’t heard an answer yet. UPS stock one month look back on Yahoo finance I think the only leverage we have is trying to win a humongous government contract (Postal Contract) with unresolved labor issues. You better believe UPS and Amazon would point out that their main competitor for the postal contract has a contentious labor dispute, an overwhelming strike vote authorization, and with stale pay rates, likely an inability to fill classes should hiring need to resume. we need that postal contract so I hope this gets resolved before the bids close otherwise it’s back to mainly night flying across most bidpacks. |
This TA went down for reasons other than money. In 2015 we were told section 24 would give us more control over training. More than 100 of us sat for years while our “bid” for training was denied for new hires. If there’s any room for wiggle, FedEx will take it. Section 1 literally has language to allow this company to wet lease while pilots are on furlough. Is it more expensive to wet lease? Maybe. But then tell me why the company wants that language in the contract. Fool me once. I’ve never seen a sell job include bullying, but that’s what we got. Pass this contract or you’ll be furloughed. Even many yes voters concluded that we won’t see a mass exodus off the top. I don’t ever want to see communications from my union like that again. I hope all pilots are aware that we are in for a he** of a fight to make any gains in this contract. It will be hard, but I’d rather go down fighting to protect what we have instead of voting in the contract that starts this pilot group to circle the drain. I hope that gives some insight into why this contract failed and why we need new leadership. It’s not about the money. Well, it’s not just about the money.
|
schloppy1 Thank you! The numerous emails from Christopher Norman during the voting process felt aggressive tone wise towards those that dared voice any criticisms about the TA. In his email after the thing burned to the ground he quotes: “putting us against each other won’t hurt the bottom line; it’ll simply destroy our Unity” Dear Chris— you guys destroyed the Unity when you forced the TA upon us and sold it like our lives depended upon its passage!
|
Originally Posted by Temocil27
(Post 3675248)
schloppy1 Thank you! The numerous emails from Christopher Norman during the voting process felt aggressive tone wise towards those that dared voice any criticisms about the TA. In his email after the thing burned to the ground he quotes: “putting us against each other won’t hurt the bottom line; it’ll simply destroy our Unity” Dear Chris— you guys destroyed the Unity when you forced the TA upon us and sold it like our lives depended upon its passage!
|
Originally Posted by CactusMan
(Post 3674885)
Who’s the condescending a$$h0le hiding behind internet anonymity now, Mr Rock?
The fact is our TA just failed because it was inadequate for the majority of our pilot group. There are MANY reasons to find it inadequate - industry/inflation-lagging pay, QOL concessions, scheduling concessions that result in a smaller MSL, retirement changes that greatly benefit the company but were sold as a win for the pilots, job protection (scope) concessions, laughable back-pay, etc. To equate all those inadequacies with chemtrail and flat-earth stupidity is to shine a light on your own ignorance. Leveraging a quick pension improvement on the backs of those who would have to pay the QOL bill for decades was a fundamentally flawed and selfish approach. |
Originally Posted by Rock
(Post 3675178)
In order to get more peanut butter, you need a knife to get it out of the jar (leverage). I’ve asked repeatedly for anyone to explain what our new leverage is going into a new round of negotiations. Something that will convince the company to give up more cash. You must think it exists. What is it?
Now we voted NO. The company and the union, at this point those words are pretty interchangeable, both don’t know what to do with themselves from the shock. “They” will recalibrate. We will get some reps who represent us. And the negotiations will continue with a big ass butter knife for that peanut butter jar. |
Originally Posted by Rock
(Post 3675189)
I didn’t make claims about no voters. I simply pointed out that you seem to have a low IQ. And I’m not interested in winding back the clock. That’s why I keep asking what new leverage we have going forward that will convince the company to cough up more money (don’t worry, I’m not asking you). The final vote on the TA was 57/43. Not sure where your data on “well over 6 in 10” comes from, but I’ve basically given up on trying to get people to stick to actual numbers.
|
Originally Posted by hemaybedid
(Post 3675282)
And the negotiations will continue with a big ass butter knife for that peanut butter jar.
|
Originally Posted by Grizzman
(Post 3675366)
You are one of us. Do you understand that. You are trying to make management's case and you are not management so smell the coffee and wake up!
|
Originally Posted by Fr8Master
(Post 3675215)
I think the only leverage we have is trying to win a humongous government contract (Postal Contract) with unresolved labor issues. You better believe UPS and Amazon would point out that their main competitor for the postal contract has a contentious labor dispute, an overwhelming strike vote authorization, and with stale pay rates, likely an inability to fill classes should hiring need to resume.
we need that postal contract so I hope this gets resolved before the bids close otherwise it’s back to mainly night flying across most bidpacks. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:46 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands