![]() |
Great question! I had to leave before the end of the meeting...did they table that?
|
Originally Posted by Rum Runner
(Post 3739064)
So what is the last slide in the survey? Came up for about an hour today in the online MEC meeting.
|
Originally Posted by FedUpWilson318
(Post 3739915)
Haven't seen the slide, but from context it's survey results regarding pilot groups confidence in current NC. Based on who want's it released I'd guess it reflects low-confidence.
|
Originally Posted by Freighthumper
(Post 3740158)
They said it was the best they could get and I'll take their word. Time to replace.
|
Originally Posted by FedUpWilson318
(Post 3740177)
Agreed...although the "establishment" delayed recalls long enough to make it a bad idea currently. The MEC should have replaced NC IMMEDIATELY after TA1.0 got shot down, but the stall tactics in LEC and MEC recalls led to us finally getting to a place where we could replace the NC far too close to the current negotiating opportunities.
|
Originally Posted by FedUpWilson318
(Post 3740177)
Agreed...although the "establishment" delayed recalls long enough to make it a bad idea currently. The MEC should have replaced NC IMMEDIATELY after TA1.0 got shot down, but the stall tactics in LEC and MEC recalls led to us finally getting to a place where we could replace the NC far too close to the current negotiating opportunities.
If the company really wants a quick deal ASAP, they will want one even more once the new NC is on line and dialed in. Now... if the only reason why they want a quick deal now is because we haven't done a line-change on the NC, that should be a huge motivator to replace the NC wouldn't you think? |
Originally Posted by plzdontfireme
(Post 3742759)
It's not a bad idea currently. A 1-2 month delay vs another failed TA or even AIP... which would you rather have?
If the company really wants a quick deal ASAP, they will want one even more once the new NC is on line and dialed in. Now... if the only reason why they want a quick deal now is because we haven't done a line-change on the NC, that should be a huge motivator to replace the NC wouldn't you think? And it won't be a 1-2 month delay. The new reps have ridiculous ideas, including further pension increases, that will drag out negotiations longer than anyone can imagine. |
Originally Posted by Bill80
(Post 3742806)
The NC is supposed to WORKS FOR THE MEC.
And it won't be a 1-2 month delay. The new reps have ridiculous ideas, including further pension increases, that will drag out negotiations longer than anyone can imagine. |
Originally Posted by Jamo
(Post 3742864)
Fixed it for you. Your second statement is speculation.
go re-read his apology email. Even he acknowledges the one-sided sales pitch and communication failures. Paired with his unacknowledged condescension and threats to the crew force, his failures extend far beyond a lack of MEC control. |
Originally Posted by CactusMan
(Post 3742890)
Correct. If PM’s only failure was a result of poor MEC guidance he’d have more supporters.
go re-read his apology email. Even he acknowledges the one-sided sales pitch and communication failures. Paired with his unacknowledged condescension and threats to the crew force, his failures extend far beyond a lack of MEC control. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:18 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands