Connecting Dots
#11
Quality response. Maybe I will.
My point is that I don’t think this pilot group realizes yet who JD truly is. I am surprised that the clowns at ALPO didn’t use that against us towards the end of their roadshows while they were trying to scare us in to voting yes on the crappy TA. It would have fit nicely on the slide under the threats of furlough.
Time to wake up boys and girls. This isn’t your daddy’s airline.
My point is that I don’t think this pilot group realizes yet who JD truly is. I am surprised that the clowns at ALPO didn’t use that against us towards the end of their roadshows while they were trying to scare us in to voting yes on the crappy TA. It would have fit nicely on the slide under the threats of furlough.
Time to wake up boys and girls. This isn’t your daddy’s airline.
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,029
It never was. And JD is CFO not CEO, he's not in the same position as he was at Atlas. But yes, every thing is gloom and doom while we go through the same negotiating process that airlines have done for decades. Meanwhile our staunch union pilots cobble up open time because of course flying all they can gives the union the help it needs.
#14
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 48
Someone on the Board needed a fourth on their golf team for the country club championship. JD must have a good game. After JD welches on a few side bets... he'll be gone. I could be wrong 😂
#15
Apples and oranges.
#16
This....the original starter gets its. Whatever is coming our way, that's the disturbing part to me. Yes, we deserve/need a respectable contract and that of course is going to take a lot of work and attention of our union.
Not being discussed, possibly being missed are the issues going on with the BOD, DE Shaw, Raj, DRIVE/Network 2.0, Dietrich, etc with company and other events on the ALPA National Stage, Age 67/Crew Complement etc.
I've been in this industry coming up on 30 years, and fascinated by it's entire history . As mentioned, there is nothing going on here that hasn't happened at another airline and pilot group.
We are distracted, and from my experience and knowledge, both in life and the profession, the things that you don't see coming are more impactful than those things you see right infront of you.
Not being discussed, possibly being missed are the issues going on with the BOD, DE Shaw, Raj, DRIVE/Network 2.0, Dietrich, etc with company and other events on the ALPA National Stage, Age 67/Crew Complement etc.
I've been in this industry coming up on 30 years, and fascinated by it's entire history . As mentioned, there is nothing going on here that hasn't happened at another airline and pilot group.
We are distracted, and from my experience and knowledge, both in life and the profession, the things that you don't see coming are more impactful than those things you see right infront of you.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 414
I didn't know fortune 50 companies chose their C suite like this. It seems their interview process is less stressful than the average 22 year old going to PSA. He is at FX for a reason sir.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 693
But I'm wondering if you or someone else can elaborate on the DE Shaw piece? I tried a quick Google and I'm not "connecting the dots" on these comments.
Respond here or via PM. Thanks.
#19
Activist investment firm with de facto control over the BOD at the moment. Look them up. They swoop in and make companies "more efficient" thus "unlocking value". Value for whom? Debatable.
#20
China Visa Applicant
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,919
There are 14 personnel on the BoD.
DE Shaw influenced two of those appointments and have an agreement which will allow them to name a third at some point.
It is perplexing to me how 3 members of a board of 14, which represent the interests of Shaw's 1% share of the company, could have "de facto control".
FedEx raises dividend, adds directors in agreement with D.E. Shaw
I think it is just as important to recognize that McKinsey and Company are also in Fred's House and seem to be advising Raj and the gang to slash/and/burn to increase the bottom line.
Certainly the combination of Shaw influencing Board decisions and McKinsey consulting on how to increase shareholder benefit, with the addition of Mr JD in the C Suite team, is going to equal some strange times ahead for organized and nonunionized labor at Purple.
DE Shaw influenced two of those appointments and have an agreement which will allow them to name a third at some point.
It is perplexing to me how 3 members of a board of 14, which represent the interests of Shaw's 1% share of the company, could have "de facto control".
FedEx raises dividend, adds directors in agreement with D.E. Shaw
I think it is just as important to recognize that McKinsey and Company are also in Fred's House and seem to be advising Raj and the gang to slash/and/burn to increase the bottom line.
Certainly the combination of Shaw influencing Board decisions and McKinsey consulting on how to increase shareholder benefit, with the addition of Mr JD in the C Suite team, is going to equal some strange times ahead for organized and nonunionized labor at Purple.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post