![]() |
Originally Posted by Rock
(Post 3764455)
Their own trucks. They're in the process of developing an entirely new sorting and distribution process. A key focus is eliminating air shipments and maximizing the use of their previously underutilized truck fleets.
https://about.usps.com/what/strategi...ear-report.pdf |
Originally Posted by Thrust Hold
(Post 3764762)
I don't think that some folks realize how many airplanes we have already parked and are parking in the not too distant future. We're down to 96 - 757's from a COVID height of 119. We're parking all of the MD-11's (the remaining 37) and have parked a handful of A300's. Just in this past 7 days we've sent 2 - MD's and 2 - 757's to VCV. Keep an eye on FRIS Lite. Planes are being flown to the desert every week.
Flexing the network is definitely necessary and I’d be more concerned if they didn’t do this when demand was soft. Failing to make strategic changes like that has killed a lot of businesses over the years. |
UPS Day sort
|
Originally Posted by Theshowson
(Post 3765334)
“The LCH facility handles ground shipments while the larger WorldPort facility at Louisville Airport will maintain its day sort.” Details matter. |
Originally Posted by YellowBanana
(Post 3765426)
“The LCH facility handles ground shipments while the larger WorldPort facility at Louisville Airport will maintain its day sort.”
Details matter. |
Originally Posted by Rock
(Post 3764455)
Their own trucks. They're in the process of developing an entirely new sorting and distribution process. A key focus is eliminating air shipments and maximizing the use of their previously underutilized truck fleets.
https://about.usps.com/what/strategi...ear-report.pdf https://federalnewsnetwork.com/agenc...in-the-future/ |
Pension Liabilities
Postal Retirement Funds in Perspective: Historical Evolution and Ongoing Challenges Office of Inspector General OIG (uspsoig.gov)
11.7% of their annual expenses are retirement-related costs. $10B. That number is supposed to balloon to $18B by FY2032 when The Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund is depleted. |
Originally Posted by opt0712
(Post 3766705)
2 Billion (with a B) loss JUST last quarter. Looks like things are going well two years into his "plan."
https://federalnewsnetwork.com/agenc...in-the-future/ “USPS saw a $240 million, or 2.7%, increase in package revenue this quarter, and delivered 98 million more packages —a 5.1% increase — compared to the same quarter last year. USPS delivered a higher volume of packages while cutting 8 million work hours — one of the agency’s largest quarterly reductions in work hours in the last decade, according to Chief Financial Officer Joe Corbett. “There’s still a lot of work we need to complete to become a long-term, self-sustaining entity,” Corbett said.” Our (FedEx Express) volume was down 18% for the last reported quarter and revenue was down 6% year over year. So the USPS is doing better than we are in that regard. Then there is this… “USPS cut transportation costs by about $489 million this quarter, shifting the focus away from air shipping contractors for delivery of mail and packages, moving instead to its ground transportation network of trucks. During this peak season, we took necessary operating risks to deliver an increased volume while incurring less costs,” DeJoy said, including minimizing peak season staffing.“ So how do you think that impacts the prospects of our retaining the Postal contract that has been worth about $1.5B annually to FedEx and, more importantly for us, required a lot of flying? |
Originally Posted by Rock
(Post 3766727)
You should read the article you linked instead of just the headline. It’s really not good news for FedEx. First, that $2B loss is actually significantly better than what was projected before the Postal Reform Act became law in 2022. But here’s the part of the article that impacts us.
“USPS saw a $240 million, or 2.7%, increase in package revenue this quarter, and delivered 98 million more packages —a 5.1% increase — compared to the same quarter last year. USPS delivered a higher volume of packages while cutting 8 million work hours — one of the agency’s largest quarterly reductions in work hours in the last decade, according to Chief Financial Officer Joe Corbett. “There’s still a lot of work we need to complete to become a long-term, self-sustaining entity,” Corbett said.” Our (FedEx Express) volume was down 18% for the last reported quarter and revenue was down 6% year over year. So the USPS is doing better than we are in that regard. Then there is this… “USPS cut transportation costs by about $489 million this quarter, shifting the focus away from air shipping contractors for delivery of mail and packages, moving instead to its ground transportation network of trucks. During this peak season, we took necessary operating risks to deliver an increased volume while incurring less costs,” DeJoy said, including minimizing peak season staffing.“ So how do you think that impacts the prospects of our retaining the Postal contract that has been worth about $1.5B annually to FedEx and, more importantly for us, required a lot of flying? The postal contract will be retained by FedEx. However, I agree the volumes will be less. Than the previous contracts. Not really worried at all since FedEx saw this coming two years ago. I'm more worried for DeJoy and and his journey to profitability. |
Originally Posted by opt0712
(Post 3766730)
I read the article my dude, and the USPS has never been profitable. Call it their version of DRIVE, but their expenses due to pension funding isn't going away no matter how much they retain in house.
The postal contract will be retained by FedEx. However, I agree the volumes will be less. Than the previous contracts. Not really worried at all since FedEx saw this coming two years ago. I'm more worried for DeJoy and and his journey to profitability. But while I appreciate your optimism regarding FedEx retaining the Postal Contract, I'm curious what you base it on? Gut feeling? New rumors? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:15 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands