Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
term sheet a kick in pants >

term sheet a kick in pants

Search
Notices

term sheet a kick in pants

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2024, 08:04 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Default

Originally Posted by DLax85 View Post
Why did our previous MEC leadership call for a strike authorization?

Why did UPS Teamsters do the same last summer?

Does the NMB control our customers when they decide how to ship?

VR,
DLax

p.s. I’m unsure what you think I’ve promised. I’m sure I don’t work for the company. I believe our leverage comes once a year - maybe twice this year. I understand profit = revenue - cost. Their goal is to maximize profit and they focus on both variables.
The strike authorization was a statement of unity. Nothing more. It was a good statement. But its usefulness ended the minute we rejected TA 1.0. 99% unity dissolved into a food fight of warring factions that have split the union into multiple pieces.

Because you remain clueless on the RLA (and shame on you for that) you don't know that the teamsters are not covered by the RLA. We are. That changes the battlefield completely. Please educate yourself. Seriously. You've got a lot of energy. It would be so much more effective for all concerned if you'd add some real world knowledge to it.

Customers aren't stupid. Less stupid than some of us apparently. They understand how the RLA negates unions like ours from striking. That's why when unions associated with passenger carriers threaten to strike, it hardly makes a ripple in their revenue. Watch what happens with American flight attendants. Haven't heard about that? Ask yourself why. And do a little research into how their efforts to strike are going. They're flight attendants. Do you really think we'd have more luck being released to strike at a cargo airline that (at least until September) carries US Mail and has military contracts? Please. Educate yourself.

If you really cared about your job, you'd research the steps required in the NMB process before we could strike. Once you did that, you'd realize why it's simply an empty threat. And everyone but apparently some of our pilots understand that. In the meantime, the company thanks us every single day for voting to extend our 2015 CBA. Right when they needed help countering lost revenue, we stepped up to the plate and agreed to a multi-year freeze on pay and benefits. We could not have done them a bigger favor. And the longer they can delay a new TA, the happier they are. Fortunately for them, we're doing the hard work of dismantling our union for them. All they have to do is sit back and watch the chaos. Brilliant.
Rock is offline  
Old 02-06-2024, 08:09 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Anthrax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 616
Default

Originally Posted by Tuck View Post
Are you really comparing an association under the NLRB to one under the RLA? Seriously...this it the kind of thinking that will kill us
some would argue that your line of thinking has killed what used to be a coveted job in aviation, gotta give the company something for a cost of living pay hike, and we have no leverage, and whah whah, you weak lil squirt maybe go take a moment in your safe space, and when you are ready to come out don’t forget to ask the company for permission.
Anthrax is offline  
Old 02-06-2024, 08:15 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2023
Posts: 170
Default

Originally Posted by Rock View Post
The strike authorization was a statement of unity. Nothing more. It was a good statement. But its usefulness ended the minute we rejected TA 1.0. 99% unity dissolved into a food fight of warring factions that have split the union into multiple pieces..
It's usefulness ended the minute the TA was made public. The NC and MEC ****ed away our unity and stepped out of the way while management drove a wedge straight through the pilot group.
plzdontfireme is offline  
Old 02-06-2024, 08:24 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Default

Originally Posted by plzdontfireme View Post
It's usefulness ended the minute the TA was made public. The NC and MEC ****ed away our unity and stepped out of the way while management drove a wedge straight through the pilot group.
It was symbolic. And you're right. It's now basically useless. But management isn't driving wedges into our union. That's all on us. They don't have to lift a finger. And they are much obliged for our efforts.
Rock is offline  
Old 02-06-2024, 08:49 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2023
Posts: 170
Default

Originally Posted by Rock View Post
It was symbolic. And you're right. It's now basically useless. But management isn't driving wedges into our union. That's all on us. They don't have to lift a finger. And they are much obliged for our efforts.
Management is absolutely driving wedges.

Reference: the management run and management supported "Silent Majority" group, vocal pilots that oppose them being put on NOQ to get them to shut-up, etc
plzdontfireme is offline  
Old 02-06-2024, 08:59 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Default

Originally Posted by plzdontfireme View Post
Management is absolutely driving wedges.

Reference: the management run and management supported "Silent Majority" group, vocal pilots that oppose them being put on NOQ to get them to shut-up, etc
You have evidence managment is running the "Silent Majority" group? I'd love to see it. Let's make that public.
Rock is offline  
Old 02-07-2024, 03:30 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2023
Posts: 113
Default

Block 5 rep was put on NOQ because he broke company social media policy when he posted is rant after being told not to. He didn't follow ALPA policy and it got him in trouble.
Maddog64 is offline  
Old 02-07-2024, 03:40 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Posts: 184
Default

Originally Posted by Rock View Post
The strike authorization was a statement of unity. Nothing more. It was a good statement. But its usefulness ended the minute we rejected TA 1.0. 99% unity dissolved into a food fight of warring factions that have split the union into multiple pieces.

Because you remain clueless on the RLA (and shame on you for that) you don't know that the teamsters are not covered by the RLA. We are. That changes the battlefield completely. Please educate yourself. Seriously. You've got a lot of energy. It would be so much more effective for all concerned if you'd add some real world knowledge to it.

Customers aren't stupid. Less stupid than some of us apparently. They understand how the RLA negates unions like ours from striking. That's why when unions associated with passenger carriers threaten to strike, it hardly makes a ripple in their revenue. Watch what happens with American flight attendants. Haven't heard about that? Ask yourself why. And do a little research into how their efforts to strike are going. They're flight attendants. Do you really think we'd have more luck being released to strike at a cargo airline that (at least until September) carries US Mail and has military contracts? Please. Educate yourself.

If you really cared about your job, you'd research the steps required in the NMB process before we could strike. Once you did that, you'd realize why it's simply an empty threat. And everyone but apparently some of our pilots understand that. In the meantime, the company thanks us every single day for voting to extend our 2015 CBA. Right when they needed help countering lost revenue, we stepped up to the plate and agreed to a multi-year freeze on pay and benefits. We could not have done them a bigger favor. And the longer they can delay a new TA, the happier they are. Fortunately for them, we're doing the hard work of dismantling our union for them. All they have to do is sit back and watch the chaos. Brilliant.
How have the union changes slowed down negotiations? We are meeting with the NMB weekly, with the same NC minus a retiree.
Westerner is offline  
Old 02-07-2024, 03:43 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 500
Default

Originally Posted by Rock View Post
You have evidence managment is running the "Silent Majority" group? I'd love to see it. Let's make that public.
It already was.
kwri10s is offline  
Old 02-07-2024, 03:59 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2023
Posts: 113
Default

Originally Posted by Westerner View Post
How have the union changes slowed down negotiations? We are meeting with the NMB weekly, with the same NC minus a retiree.
Blocks 2 and 5 wanted to remove the NC and cancel the January sessions, that's how it would have slowed things down. My guess is it would have canned more than just January. Not sure how long it would take to get a new negotiation team and train them but probably at least a couple of months.
Maddog64 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
seattlepilot
Frontier
243
08-10-2018 11:51 AM
winglet
Mesa Airlines
1487
03-01-2011 07:23 PM
CANAM
Mesa Airlines
39
10-26-2010 06:27 AM
contrails
Money Talk
7
07-17-2008 04:24 AM
Sasquatch
Cargo
10
11-09-2006 03:28 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices