Search
Notices
View Poll Results: Should we ask to be released from the NMB
About time.
88
62.41%
We should wait to hear what the company offers.
15
10.64%
What a bunch of fools.
19
13.48%
It doesn't matter when we ask. We will never be released.
19
13.48%
Voters: 141. You may not vote on this poll

Are we at an impass

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2024, 12:34 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2023
Posts: 113
Default Are we at an impass

How does everyone feel that 8 Block Reps have asked the ALPA to tell the NMB that we want to be released to self help without even hearing the companies response to our latest offer. What a bunch of fools.

Council 22 Members,
On Monday, a Special MEC Meeting was held via teleconference. Under the agenda umbrella of “Negotiation Decisions, Strategies, and Actions Moving Forward,” an assembly line of unannounced resolutions was pushed forward by MEC Status Reps Cutler, Workman, Comer, Turner, Watson, Gomez, Holmes and Beckwith.
After the meeting started, they proceeded to ambush the rest of the MEC with lengthy and complex resolutions. For the sake of political expediency, these agenda items were forced through leveraging Robert's Rules to silence and stifle debate. This process culminated in a resolution demanding that the ALPA President file a request with the National Mediation Board for a proffer of binding arbitration.
Currently, we are awaiting the Company's response to our full and complete supposal as approved by the MEC. Unfortunately, BEFORE the Company even had the chance to provide a response, the above reps voted to reject and demand a release. This short-sighted course of action will ensure that we never know what the Company was actually going to provide.
Additionally, they delayed the Negotiating Committee from providing a debrief of last week’s negotiation session and information that the Mediator wished to share with the MEC. This included, but was not limited to, new and critical information about the upcoming meetings. They actually said “no” to learning new information that would have helped shape our decision-making on their agenda items. Instead, they chose a path that was predestined and will guarantee that we don’t resume negotiations anytime soon.
Pizza Pat
Maddog64 is offline  
Old 03-06-2024, 12:37 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Crewmember
Posts: 1,377
Default

Is there anything to prevent the company from presenting their response?

How did you feel about the NC coming back to the MEC to lower the ask?
Nightflyer is offline  
Old 03-06-2024, 12:46 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2023
Posts: 113
Default

For 23 years all I have heard from this pilot group is "We want Delta plus a nickel." Since we were offered Delta plus 30% and said no, I feel the NC asking to reduce our ask from Delta plus 75% to something more resonable was fine.
Maddog64 is offline  
Old 03-06-2024, 12:52 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,030
Default

How long have we been back with the mediator, 4 months? Kinda soon to think we are at an impass if the company has a response to our proposal but we won't look at it.
Stan446 is offline  
Old 03-06-2024, 01:08 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 3,032
Default

Originally Posted by Stan446 View Post
How long have we been back with the mediator, 4 months? Kinda soon to think we are at an impass if the company has a response to our proposal but we won't look at it.
While I’m all for getting released to self help, I highly doubt that they will grant it after such a short amount of time back at the table. Hopefully I’m wrong.
BlueMoon is offline  
Old 03-06-2024, 01:34 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,091
Default

Originally Posted by Maddog64 View Post
For 23 years all I have heard from this pilot group is "We want Delta plus a nickel." Since we were offered Delta plus 30% and said no, I feel the NC asking to reduce our ask from Delta plus 75% to something more resonable was fine.
delta plus 30%? Yeah you and I definitely did not get the same TA mailed to us. I must have received the company opener.
threeighteen is offline  
Old 03-06-2024, 02:16 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: B767
Posts: 425
Default

Originally Posted by Maddog64 View Post
For 23 years all I have heard from this pilot group is "We want Delta plus a nickel." Since we were offered Delta plus 30% and said no, I feel the NC asking to reduce our ask from Delta plus 75% to something more resonable was fine.
How do you assert that TA1 had Delta plus 30%?
Temocil27 is offline  
Old 03-06-2024, 02:20 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,091
Default

Originally Posted by Temocil27 View Post
How do you assert that TA1 had Delta plus 30%?
He’s likely using the fuzzy ALPA math that used the pension increase to bump the valuation of TA1 up but then also said “we didn’t subtract taking away the pension plan for new hires from the value of the TA because it’s too difficult”

How is it easy to assign a value to an increase in pension that they didn’t even know how many pilots would take but at the same time have it be too difficult to assign a value to the same pension that they know exactly zero pilots would be getting? If anything, calculating the second number should be easier, not more difficult.

Last edited by threeighteen; 03-06-2024 at 02:54 PM.
threeighteen is offline  
Old 03-06-2024, 02:22 PM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 94
Default

Originally Posted by Maddog64 View Post
For 23 years all I have heard from this pilot group is "We want Delta plus a nickel." Since we were offered Delta plus 30% and said no, I feel the NC asking to reduce our ask from Delta plus 75% to something more resonable was fine.
Delta plus 30%?!? Are you delusional? 🤣🤣 We weren’t anywhere close to that at all. It’s well past time to send a big ole Effffff YOU straight to Rajesh’s and Johnny boy’s desks. Maybe even a polite CC to Mr. Smith since he’s still the chairman. When do the pickets and the rolling billboards up and down shady grove start? Surely we can find 20-30 volunteers to stand outside their offices until they are absolutely repulsed by the image of a FedEx pilot in uniform. We are done playing nice.
YellowBanana is offline  
Old 03-06-2024, 03:04 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2023
Posts: 113
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen View Post
He’s likely using the fuzzy ALPA math that used the pension increase to bump the valuation of TA1 up but then also said “we didn’t subtract taking away the pension plan for new hires from the value of the TA because it’s too difficult”

How is it easy to assign a value to an increase in pension that they didn’t even know how many pilots would take but at the same time have it be too difficult to assign a value to the same pension that they know exactly zero pilots would be getting? If anything, calculating the second number should be easier, not more difficult.
Whether or not you believe that the rejected TA was worth 3.8 billion, that is the number that the NMB believes the tTA was worth. I believe they will just see us as greedy pilots, and we are going to get put in the penalty box while we continue to work for 2021 wages.

on a side note has everyone seen Bolck 2and 5 email today. How nice of them to use revenue numbers of 90 and 42.7 billion in stead of profit numbers. Any increase in our wages goes against profit not revenue.
  • FedEx Corporation revenue: $90 billion
  • FedEx Express portion: $42.7 billion
  • Cash on Hand: $6+ billion
  • Stock Repurchase approved: $5.0 billion in Dec 2021 with $1.6 billion left to use
  • $116,986,301 of revenue every day for flying operations
  • 18 days of flying would pay for our entire increase over 4 years (4.9% of a single year)
Our income for the express segment last year was 1.064 billion. That is 1/40 of the revenue. Using their fuzzy math they say 18 days of revenue pays for our increase. That works out to every bit of income that express makes for 720 days. Just shy of 2 years. Cutler and Turner want every bit of the first 2years profit we make.
Maddog64 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices