Search
Notices
View Poll Results: Should we ask to be released from the NMB
About time.
88
62.41%
We should wait to hear what the company offers.
15
10.64%
What a bunch of fools.
19
13.48%
It doesn't matter when we ask. We will never be released.
19
13.48%
Voters: 141. You may not vote on this poll

Are we at an impass

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2024, 03:12 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,030
Default

Originally Posted by Maddog64 View Post
Whether or not you believe that the rejected TA was worth 3.8 billion, that is the number that the NMB believes the tTA was worth. I believe they will just see us as greedy pilots, and we are going to get put in the penalty box while we continue to work for 2021 wages.

on a side note has everyone seen Bolck 2and 5 email today. How nice of them to use revenue numbers of 90 and 42.7 billion in stead of profit numbers. Any increase in our wages goes against profit not revenue.
  • FedEx Corporation revenue: $90 billion
  • FedEx Express portion: $42.7 billion
  • Cash on Hand: $6+ billion
  • Stock Repurchase approved: $5.0 billion in Dec 2021 with $1.6 billion left to use
  • $116,986,301 of revenue every day for flying operations
  • 18 days of flying would pay for our entire increase over 4 years (4.9% of a single year)
Our income for the express segment last year was 1.064 billion. That is 1/40 of the revenue. Using their fuzzy math they say 18 days of revenue pays for our increase. That works out to every bit of income that express makes for 720 days. Just shy of 2 years. Cutler and Turner want every bit of the first 2years profit we make.
I don't think the NMB sees us in any other light than a barganing entity. They've seen every negotiation where the company is claiming poverty and the pilots asking for as much gain as they can. I think its premature to ask for a release when we haven't seen what the company's offer is.
Stan446 is offline  
Old 03-06-2024, 03:33 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 174
Default

Originally Posted by Stan446 View Post
I don't think the NMB sees us in any other light than a barganing entity. They've seen every negotiation where the company is claiming poverty and the pilots asking for as much gain as they can. I think its premature to ask for a release when we haven't seen what the company's offer is.
Because all the other offers from the company were so great. Hell, the MEC even said we were far apart at last meeting. How many more offers should we allow? 2? 8? 23? When is the right time to ask for release? I think 2.5 years is WAY overdue. Especially for “focused” negotiations. PM not only screwed up the TA, he screwed up our desire for expediency.
Jamo is offline  
Old 03-06-2024, 04:29 PM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 94
Default

Originally Posted by Stan446 View Post
I don't think the NMB sees us in any other light than a barganing entity. They've seen every negotiation where the company is claiming poverty and the pilots asking for as much gain as they can. I think its premature to ask for a release when we haven't seen what the company's offer is.
The company has made it painfully clear that they will not offer one cent more than the value of the failed TA. I’m not sure why anyone would think they’d change their stance with the supposal.

This outcome was so predictable when the MEC reached the agreement concerning the May deadline and impending replacement of the NC. Why would management not want to drag this out and force that deadline? Replacing the NC instantly adds a conservative 6 month transition (this should have happened last summer without question) prior to resuming negotiations. If the NC and MEC fail to abide by that agreement and somehow keep the same NC beyond this self-imposed deadline then we have even more division within the pilot group. The company wins in either scenario and literally had zero reason whatsoever to want to actually want to reach a deal in an expedited fashion. This was a foolish plan from the start.

We are at an impasse.
YellowBanana is offline  
Old 03-06-2024, 04:30 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Anthrax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 616
Default

the company’s offer … would inevitably fall short of our collective goals. its time. finally. to fight for significant gains. i know this is a scary time for you, stan. breathe through it.
Anthrax is online now  
Old 03-06-2024, 05:23 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 333
Default

Originally Posted by Maddog64 View Post
Whether or not you believe that the rejected TA was worth 3.8 billion, that is the number that the NMB believes the tTA was worth. I believe they will just see us as greedy pilots, and we are going to get put in the penalty box while we continue to work for 2021 wages.

on a side note has everyone seen Bolck 2and 5 email today. How nice of them to use revenue numbers of 90 and 42.7 billion in stead of profit numbers. Any increase in our wages goes against profit not revenue.
  • FedEx Corporation revenue: $90 billion
  • FedEx Express portion: $42.7 billion
  • Cash on Hand: $6+ billion
  • Stock Repurchase approved: $5.0 billion in Dec 2021 with $1.6 billion left to use
  • $116,986,301 of revenue every day for flying operations
  • 18 days of flying would pay for our entire increase over 4 years (4.9% of a single year)
Our income for the express segment last year was 1.064 billion. That is 1/40 of the revenue. Using their fuzzy math they say 18 days of revenue pays for our increase. That works out to every bit of income that express makes for 720 days. Just shy of 2 years. Cutler and Turner want every bit of the first 2years profit we make.
These two clowns need to be recalled....................especially a rep who doesn't even fly-the-line nor respond to emails.
Dakota is offline  
Old 03-06-2024, 05:27 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2023
Posts: 113
Default

Block 2 would already be gone if it wasn't for 5 and 7
Maddog64 is online now  
Old 03-06-2024, 05:29 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2023
Posts: 113
Default

He doesn't represent his block a all
Maddog64 is online now  
Old 03-06-2024, 06:13 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 153
Default

No. We might be at an impasse though.
BlueAvi8tor is offline  
Old 03-06-2024, 08:05 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,093
Default

Originally Posted by Maddog64 View Post
He doesn't represent his block a all
nor does block 7, so that’s a moot point.

at least block 2 represents his council unlike block 7.
threeighteen is offline  
Old 03-07-2024, 07:52 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11 FO
Posts: 1,109
Default

Originally Posted by YellowBanana View Post
The company has made it painfully clear that they will not offer one cent more than the value of the failed TA. I’m not sure why anyone would think they’d change their stance with the supposal.

This outcome was so predictable when the MEC reached the agreement concerning the May deadline and impending replacement of the NC. Why would management not want to drag this out and force that deadline? Replacing the NC instantly adds a conservative 6 month transition (this should have happened last summer without question) prior to resuming negotiations. If the NC and MEC fail to abide by that agreement and somehow keep the same NC beyond this self-imposed deadline then we have even more division within the pilot group. The company wins in either scenario and literally had zero reason whatsoever to want to actually want to reach a deal in an expedited fashion. This was a foolish plan from the start.

We are at an impasse.
Why would it add 6 months? Cutler and crowd have said it would add at most 1 month transition. Now I think it'll be way more than 6 months. We just upped our ante and then before even waiting for a response, said we quit. The controlling entity - the NMB - is gonna have a fit with that. Dumbest move ever. The "even more" division within the pilot group just hit the peak but it will get worse before it gets better. Let's see how you feel in 4 months when we don't even have dates to negotiate and the NMB gives us the same treatment they recently gave SWA and ATI - no. One word answer - there is ZERO requirement anywhere that we must get released. It has to happen one day - but maybe that day is in 10 years from now and it's up to us to see if we can last that long or get something sooner. Dumbest move ever and you morons helped it happen.
Tuck is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices