View Poll Results: Yes or No
Yes
28
31.11%
No
62
68.89%
Voters: 90. You may not vote on this poll
Yes or No only please.
11-19-2024 | 03:12 PM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,065
Likes: 40
From: 767 Captain
Of course they are. Why wouldn't they? It's an easy cost cutting measure to legally reduce everyone's pay in the name of saving junior jobs. Except there's no requirement for them to prove it's actually saving anyone's job. Just a vague threat linked to SAM which they've obviously shown that they can manipulate as required. The other option would be for them to go out and seek new business. Nahhhhh!!!! Why do that when they can keep the SAM down, play reindeer games and cry poor during year 3 of contract negotiations.
11-25-2024 | 08:46 AM
#22
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 494
Likes: 87
I tell you what those other airlines didn't have, which is their NC working for management.
"They'd never do that!"
11-25-2024 | 09:13 AM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,174
Likes: 1
The NC recently discussed 4A2b items with management. One of them being leaves of absences. But they denied offering leaves of absences despite it being a no cost item to releive any supposed overmanning issue. If they trully were overmanned (looking at furlouging), then why wouldn't they offer a leave of absence package?
11-25-2024 | 09:26 AM
#25
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
The NC recently discussed 4A2b items with management. One of them being leaves of absences. But they denied offering leaves of absences despite it being a no cost item to releive any supposed overmanning issue. If they trully were overmanned (looking at furlouging), then why wouldn't they offer a leave of absence package?
11-27-2024 | 07:42 AM
#26
China Visa Applicant
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,964
Likes: 16
From: Midfield downwind
