Every Bid an Excess Bid
09-08-2015, 04:04 PM
#81
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Boxes,
My comment on the 2006 payout was simple. Bonuses (supposedly back pay) did not match pay rates. As a SO my pay rate was about 70% of the FO rate but my bonus was about half. Hard to pretend that is fair in any way. This time my bonus is about 70% of a captains. That is fair. The difference is in 2006 we were bottom heavy with new hires. My comment was simply to point out the fairest way to pay the bonus would be to give everyone 130 hours. That way it is faithful to seniority.
My comment on the 2006 payout was simple. Bonuses (supposedly back pay) did not match pay rates. As a SO my pay rate was about 70% of the FO rate but my bonus was about half. Hard to pretend that is fair in any way. This time my bonus is about 70% of a captains. That is fair. The difference is in 2006 we were bottom heavy with new hires. My comment was simply to point out the fairest way to pay the bonus would be to give everyone 130 hours. That way it is faithful to seniority.
09-08-2015, 07:25 PM
#82
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 46
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Boxes,
My comment on the 2006 payout was simple. Bonuses (supposedly back pay) did not match pay rates. As a SO my pay rate was about 70% of the FO rate but my bonus was about half. Hard to pretend that is fair in any way. This time my bonus is about 70% of a captains. That is fair. The difference is in 2006 we were bottom heavy with new hires. My comment was simply to point out the fairest way to pay the bonus would be to give everyone 130 hours. That way it is faithful to seniority.
My comment on the 2006 payout was simple. Bonuses (supposedly back pay) did not match pay rates. As a SO my pay rate was about 70% of the FO rate but my bonus was about half. Hard to pretend that is fair in any way. This time my bonus is about 70% of a captains. That is fair. The difference is in 2006 we were bottom heavy with new hires. My comment was simply to point out the fairest way to pay the bonus would be to give everyone 130 hours. That way it is faithful to seniority.
09-08-2015, 07:55 PM
#83
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,191
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Boxes,
My comment on the 2006 payout was simple. Bonuses (supposedly back pay) did not match pay rates. As a SO my pay rate was about 70% of the FO rate but my bonus was about half. Hard to pretend that is fair in any way. This time my bonus is about 70% of a captains. That is fair. The difference is in 2006 we were bottom heavy with new hires. My comment was simply to point out the fairest way to pay the bonus would be to give everyone 130 hours. That way it is faithful to seniority.
My comment on the 2006 payout was simple. Bonuses (supposedly back pay) did not match pay rates. As a SO my pay rate was about 70% of the FO rate but my bonus was about half. Hard to pretend that is fair in any way. This time my bonus is about 70% of a captains. That is fair. The difference is in 2006 we were bottom heavy with new hires. My comment was simply to point out the fairest way to pay the bonus would be to give everyone 130 hours. That way it is faithful to seniority.
09-08-2015, 07:59 PM
#84
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,191
Originally Posted by Busboy
I think you should be able to hold your seat, if the senior guy had the ability to bid it on the same bid you got it. Unless, he is excessed(assigned) out of his seat.
You snooze, you lose.
You snooze, you lose.
09-09-2015, 03:50 AM
#85
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 554
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Boxes,
My comment on the 2006 payout was simple. Bonuses (supposedly back pay) did not match pay rates. As a SO my pay rate was about 70% of the FO rate but my bonus was about half. Hard to pretend that is fair in any way. This time my bonus is about 70% of a captains. That is fair. The difference is in 2006 we were bottom heavy with new hires. My comment was simply to point out the fairest way to pay the bonus would be to give everyone 130 hours. That way it is faithful to seniority.
My comment on the 2006 payout was simple. Bonuses (supposedly back pay) did not match pay rates. As a SO my pay rate was about 70% of the FO rate but my bonus was about half. Hard to pretend that is fair in any way. This time my bonus is about 70% of a captains. That is fair. The difference is in 2006 we were bottom heavy with new hires. My comment was simply to point out the fairest way to pay the bonus would be to give everyone 130 hours. That way it is faithful to seniority.
09-09-2015, 04:10 AM
#86
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Originally Posted by DLax85
This time, why is the NB SO bonus the same as the NB FO bonus?
Or it could be that they said hey for the 3 guys still getting SO pay lets throw them a bone.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
